Articles

Literary Studies in the Context of Visual Culture: Virginia Woolf as an Example

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

Abstract

With the “cultural turn” of the literary study, the relationship of the visual culture and literature, especially the literary study in the background of visual culture, arouses the study interest of the literary circle. However, critics usually focus on the theoretical exploration and conceptual analysis instead of giving some case studies. For the sake of this, this paper purports to explore Virginia Woolf's aesthetic ideas in visual arts such as movie, painting, and stage performance, and accordingly to discuss the integration, adaptation, and influence of Virginia Woolf's literary works in the three aspects mentioned above.

Cite this article

MOU Fanghua . Literary Studies in the Context of Visual Culture: Virginia Woolf as an Example[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2016 , 16(03) : 69 -75 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2016.03.013

References

Baldwin, E. 1999. Introducing Cultural Studies [M]. London: Prentice Hall Europe.
Bellamy, S. 2012. Woolf and arts: Homage, afterlife, and the originating text [A]. In B. Randall & J. Goldman (eds.). Virginia Woolf in Context [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 267-272.
Beacham,R.C.B. (ed.). 1993. Adolphe Appia: Texts on Theatre [C]. London: Routledge. 116.
Dikovitskaya, M. 2012. Major Theoretical Frameworks in Visual Culture [A]. In I. Heywood & B. Sandywell (eds.). The Handbook of Visual Culture [C]. London & New York: Berg.74.
Fry, R. 1981.Vision and Design (J. B. Bullen ed.) [M]. London: Oxford University Press.
Gillespie, D. F. 1988. The Sisters' Arts: The Writing and Painting of Virginia Woolf and Vanessa Bell [M]. New York: Syracuse University Press.
Goldman, J. 2001. The Feminist Aesthetics of Virginia Woolf [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gounaridou, K. (ed.). 2010. Text and Presentation, 2009 [C]. London & North Carolina: MacFarland Publisher.160.
Howells, H. & J. Negreiros. 2012. Visual Culture (2nd ed.) [M]. Cambridge: Polity.
Humm, M. 2003. Modernist Women and Visual Cultures [M]. New Brunswick & New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Humm, M. 2012. Cinema and photography [A].In B.Randal & J.Goldman(eds.).Viginia Woolf in Context [C].Cambridge University Press.291.
LaSalle, M. 2002. Chronicle movie critic [J/OL]. San Francisco Chronicle review. [2014-08-16]. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/12/27/DD114138.DTL.
Marcus, J. 1994. A tale of two cultures [J]. Women's Review of Books (1): 11-13.
Miller, J. H. 2004. On Literature [M]. London and New York: Routledge.
Mitchell,W.J.T.2002.Showing seeing:A critical of visual culture [A].In N.Mirzeff (ed.).The Visual Culture Reader (2nd ed.) [C].London & New York:Routledge.86-100.
Sichickel, R.2002. Holiday movie preview: The hours [J/OL].Time Review. [2014-08-16]. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1003931,00.html.
Silver, B. R. 1999. Virginia Woolf Icon [M]. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Simpson,K. S. 2012. Woolf's Bloomsbury [A]. In B. Randall & J. Goldman (eds.). Virginia Woolf in Context [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 170.
Whitworth,M. H. W. 2005. Virginia Woolf [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woolf, V. 1934. Water Sickert. A Conversation [M]. London: The Hogarth Press.
Woolf, V. 1947. The Moment and Other Essays [M]. London: The Hogarth Press.
Woolf, V. 2000. Between the Acts [M]. London: Penguin.
Wright, E. H. 2012. Woolf and theatre [A]. In B. Randall & J. Goldman (eds.). Virginia Woolf in Context [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 303.
Zwerdling, A. 1986. Virginia Woolf and The Real World [M]. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
张冲. 2009.改编学与改编研究:语境·理论·应用 [J].外国文学评论(3): 207-218.
张永清. 2010.文学研究如何应对视觉文化的挑战 [J].江海学刊(1):199-204.
赵勇. 2009. 视觉文化时代的文学状况——2008年文化研究学术前沿报告[J].贵州社会科学(3):36.
Outlines

/