It has been observed that language use accuracy of the English learners in China is determined by their familiarities with the form of life which the native speakers lead. The English learners' inaccurate performances are indicative of the learning controversy between the empiricist's approaches and the rationalist's approaches. Based on this observation, the present study attempts to provide a philosophical insight into the depth of language learning from the perspective of the latter Wittgenstein's philosophy of language. It is believed that the English learners vary in linguistic performance and deviate from the linguistic norms rightly because they are at the different levels of both language awareness and concept enrichment. In tune with Wittgenstein's idea that learning a language brings about the understanding of it, and in response to Augustine's question whether or not we agree that words are signs, the present study puts forward an idea that English learning is both a process of elevation from sign recognition to concept enrichment and a process of the learners' development from intuitive and incidental language awareness to planned and integrated language awareness.
TANG Qi min, DU Shihong
. Reflections on the Language Awareness and Concept Enrichment of English Learners in China[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2016
, 16(06)
: 66
-71
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2016.06.011
Augustine. 1997. The teacher [A]. In M. Adler, and R.M.Hutchins (eds.). The Great Ideas Today [C]. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica. 261-297.
Blair, D. 2006. Wittgenstein, Language and Information[ M]. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bloom, P. 2000. How Children Learn the Meanings of Words[ M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Carter, R. 1995. How aware should language aware teachers and learners be? [A]. In R. Berry, V. Berry & D. Nunan (eds.). Language Awareness in Language Education [C]. Hong Kong: Department of Curriculum Studies at the University of Hong Kong. 1-16.
Diller, K. C. 2004. The Language Teaching Controversy (3rd edn.) [M]. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers.
Fodor, J.A. 1995. Concepts: A Potboiler[J]. Philosophical Issues 6: 1-24.
Fodor, J. A. 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frege, G. 1952. On concept and object [A]. In P. Geach & M. Black (eds.). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 42-55.
Hawkins, E. 1984. Awareness of Language [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackendoff, R. 1999. What is a concept, that a person may grasp it? [A]. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (eds.). Concepts: Core Readings [C]. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 305-333.
James, C. 1996. A cross-linguistic approach to language awareness [J]. Language Awareness 5(3): 138-148.
Milton, J. & G. Donzelli. 2013. The lexicon [A]. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 441-460.
Moyal-Sharrock, D. 2016. Wittgenstein: No linguistic idealist [A]. In S. Grève & J. Mácha (eds.). Wittgenstein and the Creativity of Language [C]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 117-138.
Purves, B. 2002. China on the Lam: On Foot across the People's Republic [M]. Hong Kong: Asia 2000 Limited.
White, L.J.B.Maylath & A. Adams.2000. Language Awareness: A History and Implementations [M]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. 1974. Philosophical Grammar [M]. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Wittgenstein, L. 1999. Philosophical Investigations [M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing House.
杜世洪.2010. 关于假装的语言分析和概念考察:对中国后语言哲学的一个思考[J].外语学刊(2):7-13.
冷慧、林桐. 2016. 外语教育中新人文精神培养的路径[J]. 当代外语研究(2):17-20.
维特根斯坦. 2003.哲学语法(程志民译) [M]. 石家庄:河北教育出版社.
维特根斯坦. 2004. 哲学研究(李步楼译)[M]. 北京:商务印书馆.
姚剑鹏. 2016. 二语习得视域下会话自我修补研究 [J]. 当代外语研究(3):33-37.
