In modern Chinese, the grammaticalization of “Ranhou”(然后) is characterized by three main features: temporal relation > spatial relation, objectivity> subjectivity, generalization of the functions. This is a reverse process against the cognitive processes of “space> time” and “subjectivity> objectivity” in cognitive linguistics. The former studies have not given a proper illustration to this phenomenon. Based on the theory of philosophy of mind, this essay shows that the starting point of Ranhou's grammaticalization process is the intentional content focus of “relationship”. Affected by mental-physical supervenience, it is a result of the emergence of different new “relationships” between different levels under the domain of “relationship”. The grammaticalization process of Ranhou experiences three stages: (1) objective order to subjective order stage: with the mental property of “the sequence” relationship, it emerges from time relation to space relation, and then the magnitude relation; (2) the extension stage of subjective sequence: based on the first stage, the emergence of a logic relationship and objectively disordered events (parallel, comparison relations, etc. ) happens in this stage; (3) discourse marker and discourse assistance element stage: a period from objective events relation to discourse relation.
LI Wenjing
. The Causes for the Grammaticalizaiton of “Ranhou”: A Perspective of Philosophy of Mind[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017
, 17(01)
: 61
-66
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.01.011
Davidson, D. 1980. Mental events[A]. Reprinted in D. Davidson. Essays on Actions and Events [C]. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 207-227.
Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hunnemeyer.1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Famework[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hopper, P.J. & E.C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meillet A.1912. L'évolution des forms grammaticales. [J]. Scientia(Rivista di Scienza 6: 384-400. (Reprinted in Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 130-148. Paris: Champion, 1958.)
Searle,J. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
蔡曙山.2006.再论哲学的语言转向及其意义——兼论从分析哲学到语言哲学的发展[J].学术界(4):20-39.
蔡曙山.2010.人类心智探秘的哲学之路——试论从语言哲学到心智哲学的发展[J].晋阳学刊(3):3-11.
何洪峰.孙岚.2010.“然后”的语法化及其认知机制[J].云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版)(5): 15-21.
李嘉璇.2014.“然后”一词的连续统研究[J].发展(8): 100-101.
李汶璟.2008.语法化动因的认知语用阐释[J].重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)(1): 136-138.
沈家煊.1998.实词虚化的机制——《演化而来的语法》评介[J].当代语言学(3): 41-46.
王伟.2004.试论现代汉语口语中“然后”一词的语法化[J].北京第二外国语学院学报(4): 69-76.
王伟、周卫红.2005.“然后”一词在现代汉语口语中使用范围的扩大及其机制[J].汉语学习(4): 31-39.
徐盛桓.2010.感受质与感受意[J].现代外语(4): 331-338.
徐盛桓.2011.语言研究的心智哲学视角——“心智哲学与语言研究”之五[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版)(4): 1-12.
徐盛桓.2013. 意向性的认识论意义——从语言运用的视角看[J].外语教学与研究(2):174-184.
徐盛桓、何爱晶. 2014. 转喻隐喻机理新论——心智哲学视域下修辞研究之一[J].外语教学(1):1-6.
颜泽贤、范冬萍、张华夏.2006.系统科学导论——复杂性探索[M].北京:人民出版社.