Postmodern Criticism of Knowledge and Its Paradox: Exploring Relations between Knowledge and Thinking

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

Abstract

In the paper, we explore the relations between knowledge and thinking in the context of postmodern criticism, hoping that the discussion can contribute to the reform in foreign language teaching. The role of knowledge has long been overlooked in foreign language teaching, and knowledge has been mistaken for information. As a result, imparting knowledge is reduced to sharing fragments of information. We argue that knowledge provides cognitive frameworks and basic procedures for thinking, without which thinking suffers in depth and translingual intertextual ties cannot be established. It is because foreign language teaching does not pay sufficient attention to the systematicity of knowledge in its practice that students have problems in critical thinking. We believe postmodern criticism of knowledge can help us understand better the roles of knowledge in thinking, and on the other hand, the paradox in postmodernism can shed light on how to handle the relations in teaching.

Cite this article

Qü Weiguo, CHEN Liufang . Postmodern Criticism of Knowledge and Its Paradox: Exploring Relations between Knowledge and Thinking[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017 , 17(03) : 15 -19 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.03.003

References

Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics [M]. New York: Routledge.
Berger, P.L. & T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality [M]. New York: Penguin.
Bertens, H. 1995. The Idea of the Postmodern: A History. [M]. London: Routledge.
Butler, C. 2002. Post-modernism: A Very Short Introduction [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Canagarajah, S. 2010. A rhetoric of shuttling between languages [A]. In. B. Horner, M. Lu & P.K. Matsuda (eds.). Cross-language Relations in Composition [C]. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP. 158-82.
Carr, D. (ed.). 2014. Education Knowledge and Truth: Beyond the Postmodern Impasse [M]. London: Routledge.
Eagleton, T. 1996. The Illusions of Postmodernism [M]. Oxford: Blackwell.
Foucault, M. 1984.Truth and power [A]. In P. Rainbow (ed.). The Foucault Reader [C]. London: Penguin. 51-75.
Jamesson, F. 1991. Postmodernism or The Cultural Logic of Late Captialism [M]. Durham: Duke University Press.
Lyotard, J. 1979. Postmodern Conditions (Tr. By G. Bennington & B. Massumi) [M]. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ong, W. 1992. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word [M]. New York: Routledge.
Said, E. 1979. Orientalism [M]. London: Vintage.
Smart, B. 1992. Modern Conditions, Postmodern Controversies [M]. London: Routledge.
White, H. 1978. The historical text as a literary artifact [A]. In H. White (ed.). Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism [C]. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 81-100.
曲卫国. 2015. 缺乏的到底是思辨能力还是系统知识?——也谈外语专业学生的思辨问题[J].中国外语(1): 60-66.
曲卫国. 2016. 国家标准能让英语学科走出困境吗?——谈谈英语专业改革与英语学科建设的关系[J]. 外国语(3): 11-13
曲卫国、陈流芳. 2016. 试论跨文化交际语境下的话语效率——谈谈中国文化的跨文化传播问题[A]. 中国修辞学(胡范铸、曹石珠主编)[C]. 上海:学林出版社. 21-27.
Outlines

/