Text-based Grammatical Completion:Its Validity Analysis and Intended Washback

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

Abstract

The National Matriculation English Test (NMET) employs a new item format: Text-based Grammatical Completion task. This paper reports a validation study on this new item format by means of a multi-dimensional discourse analysis with the intention to predict its potential washback effect on future EFL education in primary and middle schools in China. The case analysis of the 2014-item reveals multiple intentions of the test writers, and different kinds of competencies have been found to be elicited by the new item type, by which a new understanding of “grammar” is conveyed. The findings demonstrate that the implementation of the new test format will trigger a positive and facilitating washback effect on future primary and secondary EFL education in China. This research is significant not only in conducting a case analysis, but also in introducing a new method of text-based test method validation.

Cite this article

CHANG Xinping, ZHU Changquan . Text-based Grammatical Completion:Its Validity Analysis and Intended Washback[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017 , 17(05) : 16 -20 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.05.003

References

Bachman, L.F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L.F. & A.S. Palmer. 1996. Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Test [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, A. 2007. IELTS Washback in Context:Preparation for Academic Writing in Higher Education [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Green, A. 2013. Washback in language assessment [J]. International Journal of English Studies 13(2):39-51.
Halliday, M.A.K. & R.Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English [M]. London: Longman.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. 1985. Language, Context and Text [M]. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. & M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th edn.) [M]. London: Routledge.
Messick, S. 1989. Validity [A]. In R. Linn (ed.). Educational Measurement [C]. New York: ACE/Macmillan. 13-103.
Qi, L. 2005. Stakeholders' conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test [J]. Language Testing 22(2): 142-173.
Schiffrin, D. 1994. Approaches to Discourse [M]. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Stubbs, M. 1983. Discourse Analysis [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wall, D. & J.C. Alderson. 1993. Examining washback: The Sri Lankan impact study [J]. Language Testing 10: 41-69.
桂诗春. 1982. EPT——一种标准性、客观性的英语水平测试[J]. 外语教学与研究(4):66-72.
黄国文. 1988. 语篇分析概要[M]. 长沙:湖南教育出版社.
教育部. 2003. 普通高中英语课程标准(实验)》[M]. 北京:人民教育出版社.
教育部考试中心. 2014. 2014年普通高等学校招生全国统一考试大纲的说明(理科·课程标准实验版)[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社.
李筱菊. 1997. 语言测试科学与艺术[M]. 长沙:湖南教育出版社.
刘美君. 2016. 英文文法有道理[M]. 台北:联经出版事业股份有限公司.
刘晓华、辜向东. 2013. 国内外反拨效应实证研究二十年回顾[J]. 外语测试与教学(1):4-17.
亓鲁霞. 2012. 语言测试反拨效应的近期研究与未来展望[J].现代外语(2):202-220.
徐烈炯. 2002. 功能主义与形式主义[J].外国语(2):8-14.
张德禄. 2000. 论语篇连贯.外语教学与研究(2):103-109.
Outlines

/