In foreign language (FL) teaching, the “reading for discussion” model aims to provide the learners with social contexts where they are exposed to and learn to use FL to transmit meaning in oral interaction with others. In this model the learners are wainly trained with three language skills, i.e. reading, writing, and speaking. By gaining practices in reading, writing, and speaking, students are given opportunities to make significant improvements in their levels of foreign language proficiency. In addition, the “reading for discussion”model helps improve students' language learning motivation and offers the added benefit of processing the foreign language more deeply and internalizing their knowledge through implicit learning.
WU Shiyu, HUANG Shaoqiang
. College English Instruction, Why Hold onto the “Reading for Discussion” Model?[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2018
, 18(02)
: 9
-14
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2018.02.002
Amelia, L. & R. Berthele. 2015. Age and Foreign Language Learning in School [M]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Anderson, N.J. 1999. Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies [M]. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Belcher, D.D. & A.R. Hirvela (eds.). 2003. Linking Literacies: Perspectives on L2 Reading-Writing Connections [C]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Brinton, D.M., Snow, M.A. & M.B. Wesche. 1989. Content-based Second Language Instruction [M]. New York: Newbury House.
Brookfield, S.D. & S. Preskill. 1999. Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davis, B.G. 1993. Tools for Teaching [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
de Graaf, R. & A. Housen. 2009. Investigating effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction [A]. In M.H. Long & C. Doughty (eds.). Blackwell Handbook of Language Teaching [C]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 726-753.
DeKeyser, R.M. 2014. Age effects in second language learning [A]. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. London & New York: Routledge. 442-460.
Dörnyei, Z. 2009. The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elley, W.B. & F. Mangubhai. 1983. The impact of reading on second language learning [J]. Reading Research Quarterly 19: 53-67.
Fears, J.R. 2008. Famous Greeks [M]. Virginia: The Teaching Company.
Gass, S. & A. Mackey. 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [M]. London & New York: Routledge.
Grabe, W. & F. Stoller. 1997. Reading and vocabulary development in a second language: A case study [A]. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (eds.). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 98-123.
Hutchins, R.M. 1936. The Higher Learning in America [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S.D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications [M]. London: Longman.
Krashen, S. & S.Y. Lee. 2004. Competence in foreign language writing: Progress and lacunae [J]. Literacy Across Cultures 12(2):10-14.
Lantolf, J.P. 2006. Sociocultural theory and second language development: State-of-the-art [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(1):67-109.
Nation, P. 2006. How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? [J] Canadian Modern Language Review 63:59-82.
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. 2006. Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An Eye-tracking study [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38:97-130.
Pigada, M. & N. Schmitt. 2006. Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study [J]. Reading in a Foreign Language 18:1-28.
Robinson, P. 2003. The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning [J]. Second Language Studies 21:45-105.
Stotsky, S. 1983. Research on reading/writing relationships: A synthesis and suggested directions [J]. Language Arts 5:627-642.
Tarone, E. 2015. Second language acquisition in applied linguistics: 1925-2015 and beyond [J]. Applied Linguistics 4:444-453.
Vygotsky, L.S. 1986. Thought and Language [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Webb, S. 2005. Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effect of reading and writing on word knowledge [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27:33-52.
West, R., Stanovich, K. & H. Mitchell. 1993. Reading in the real world and its correlates [J]. Reading Research Quarterly 28:35-48.
Wu, S. 2016. The Use of L1 Cognitive Resources in L2 Reading by Chinese EFL Learners [M]. London & New York: Routledge.
Zhang, L.J. 2000. Metacognition in L2 reading literacy acquisition: The case of ten Chinese students learning to read EFL [A]. In A. Brown (ed.). English in Southeast Asia: Developing Multiliteracies [C]. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. 83-96.
甘阳. 2007. 大学人文教育的理念、目标与模式[A]. 中国大学的人文教育(载甘阳、陈来、苏力)[C]. 北京:三联书店. 3-40.
李曼丽、汪永铨. 1999. 关于“通识教育”概念内涵的讨论[J]. 清华大学教育研究(1):99-104.
马拯. 2017. 任务教学法研究30年:回顾与启示[J]. 西安外国语大学学报(1):67-71.
秦秀白. 2012. 警惕课堂教学娱乐化[J]. 当代外语研究(7):1-3.
孙有中. 2011. 突出思辨能力培养,将英语专业教学改革引向深入[J]. 中国外语(3):49-58.
吴诗玉. 2013. 探讨大学英语教学“命运”的多种可能[J]. 中国大学教学(11):37-43.
吴诗玉、马拯. 2012. 中国学习者外语故事理解中心理表征建构过程及管理[J]. 现代外语(3):278-285.
吴诗玉、张宇英、胡青青. 2017. 第二语言阅读“熔断”假说的认知心理证据:在线篇章处理的范式[J]. 心理学报(3):285-295.
杨枫、吴诗玉. 2013. 大学英语教学通识化转向的“逻各斯”[J]. 外语电化教学(1):9-14.
章兼中、陈岑、姜丹. 2016. 国外外语教学法主要流派[M]. 福州:福建教育出版社.
