An adequate account of the factors related to the receptivity of translation may contribute to the effectiveness of promoting China's solution to global governance. For that purpose, the study looks into the coverage of “mingyun gongtongti” over the past 6 years in the English media around the world, and analyzes the major factors contributing to the effectiveness of its publicity. The study finds that the solution proposed by China has major receptivity from among the bordering countries or some developing countries, which suggests China is obliged to do more to strengthen her discourse power. In addition, we should be vigilant that China's discourse segments are "borrowed with kindness" by the West and its wisdom and its plans are taken advantage of. This might further lead to the weakening of China's discourse power.
QIN Hongwu, ZHOU Xia
. On the Effect of the Receptiveness of China's Discourse of Global Governance: A Case Study of Community of Shared Future for Mankind[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2018
, 18(04)
: 25
-33
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2018.04.001
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power [M]. London: Longman.
Hall, B.J. 1992. Theories of culture and communication [J]. Communication Theory 2(1):50-70.
Lister, A. 1876. Dr. Legge's metrical Shi-King [J]. The China Review 5(1):1-9.
Martin, J. & D. Rose. 2003. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause [M]. London: Continuum.
Parsons, T. 1970. On building social system theory: A personal history [J]. Daedalus 99(4):826-881.
Schramm, W. 1971. Nature of communication between humans [A]. In W. Schramm & D.F. Roberts (eds.). The Process and Effects of Mass Communication [C]. Champaign: University of Illinois Press. 4-55.
Scollon, R. & S.W. Scollon. 1995. Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach [M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
van Dijk, T.A. 2015. Critical discourse analysis [A]. In H. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis [C]. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 466-485.
Waugh R., T. Catalano, K. Masaeed, T.H. Do & P.G. Renigar. 2015. Critical Discourse Analysis: Definition, Approaches, Relation to Pragmatics, Critique, and Trends [M]. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. 71-135
陈亦琳、李艳玲. 2014. 构建融通中外的新概念、新范畴、新表述——中国政治话语传播研讨会综述[J]. 红旗文稿(1):27-29.
秦洪武、孔蕾. 2016. 儒学海外传播的探索性数据分析[J]. 当代外语研究(6):23-30.
史安斌、张耀钟. 2018. 2018年对外传播理论与实践创新前瞻[J]. 对外传播(1):7-10.
杨平. 2017. 从“中国关键词”看中国特色政治话语的对外传播——专访美国明德大学蒙特雷国际研究学院鲍川运教授[J]. 对外传播(4):22-25.
