Articles

John Sinclair's Phrase Theory and Study of Meaning

Expand

Online published: 2021-12-31

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss John Sinclair's phrase theory and its key concepts, his major contributions to the study of meaning, and the inadequacies as well. It is argued that Sinclair's major achievements in the study of meaning can be attributed to his phrase theory, that its core components are phraseological items and lexical items, that his model of extended unit of meaning, consisting of core, collocation, colligation, semantic preference and semantic prosody, can be applied to the description of both lexical items and phraseological items. Sinclair's major contributions to the study of meaning include that to a great extent he turned the linguists' attention from context to cotext, that he developed and improved the KWIC analysis, upon which the model of extended unit of meaning was formulated, that he put forward the theoretical framework of his phrase theory, getting theoretically ready for the study of meaning. The inadequacies are that the notion of semantic prosody is still vague, preventing the model of extended unit of meaning from being fully exploited, and that paraphrase has not been theoretically evaluated, resulting in language users' meaning not being reflected in his study of meaning.

Cite this article

PU Jianzhong . John Sinclair's Phrase Theory and Study of Meaning[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021 , 21(6) : 60 -76 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2021.06.007

References

[1] Cheng W., C. Greaves, J. Sinclair & M. Warren. 2008. Uncovering the extent of the phraseological tendency: Towards a systematic analysis of Concgrams[J]. Applied Linguistics 30(2): 236-252.
[2] Firth J. R. 1957. Papers in Linguistics, 1934-1951 [M]. London: Oxford University Press.
[3] Firth J. R. 1968. Selected Papers of J. R. Firth, 1952-1959 [M]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
[4] Hoey M.(ed.). 1993. Data, Description, Discourse: Papers on the English Language in Honour of John Mch Sinclair[C]. London: Harper-Collins.
[5] Hoey M. 2007. Obituary: John Sinclair[N]. The Guardian (5-3): News/Education.
[6] Hunston S. & G. Francis. 2000. Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[7] Louw B. 1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies [A]. In M. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds.). Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 157-176.
[8] Renouf, A. & J. Sinclair. 1991. Collocational frameworks in English [A]. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (eds.). English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik [C]. London & New York: Longman.128-143.
[9] Sinclair J. 1966. Beginning the study of lexis [A]. In C. E. Bazell, J. C. Catford, M. A. K. Halliday & R. H. Robins (eds.). In Memory of J. R. Firth [C]. London: Longman. 410-430.
[10] Sinclair J., S. Jones & R. Daley. 1970/2004. English Collocation Studies: The OSTI Report[M]. London: Continuum.
[11] Sinclair J.(ed.). 1987. Looking Up: An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing and the Development of the Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary[C]. London: Collins ELT.
[12] Sinclair J. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[13] Sinclair J. 1996. The search for units of meaning[J]. Textus 9(1): 75-106.
[14] Sinclair J. 1998. The lexical item [A]. In E. Weigand (ed.). Contrastive Lexical Semantics [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1-24.
[15] Sinclair J. 2003. Reading Concordances: An Introduction[M]. London: Pearson.
[16] Sinclair J. 2004a. Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse[M]. London: Routledge.
[17] Sinclair J. 2004b. Language and computing, past and present [A]. In K. Ahmad & M. Rogers (eds.). New Directions in LSP Studies [C]. Guildford: The University of Surrey. 1-12.
[18] Sinclair J. 2008. The phrase, the whole phrase, and nothing but the phrase [A]. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (eds.). Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 407-410.
[19] Sinclair J. 2010. Defining the definiendum [A]. In G. de Schryver (ed.). A Way with Words: Recent Advances in Lexical Theory and Analysis [C]. Kampala: Menha Publishers. 37-47.
[20] Sinclair J. 2016. Language, Discourse, Style: Selected Works of John McH. Sinclair[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[21] Sinclair J. & A. Mauranen. 2006. Linear Unit Grammar[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[22] Stubbs M. 2009. The search for units of meaning: Sinclair on empirical semantics[J]. Applied Linguistics 30(1): 115-137.
[23] Tognini-Bonelli E. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[24] 李文中. 2018. 短语理论框架综述[J]. 外语教学与研究50(1): 49-59.
[25] 李文中、 濮建忠、 甄凤超、 邵斌. 2020. 再探语义韵[J]. 当代外语研究(2): 72-83.
[26] 濮建忠. 2020. 扩展意义单位模型再解读[J]. 外语研究180(2): 1-8.
[27] 濮建忠、 宋亚军、 钟含春. 2020. 中国的语义韵研究:现状、困惑与探讨[J]. 语料库研究前沿(1): 128-138.
[28] 邵斌. 2020. John Sinclair早期语言学思想探源[J]. 语料库语言学 7(1): 1-17.
[29] 卫乃兴. 2007. John Sinclair的语言学遗产--其思想与方法评述[J]. 外国语 170(4): 14-19.
[30] 卫乃兴. 2011. 词语学要义[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
[31] 甄凤超、 杨枫. 2019. 再谈语义韵的短语及语用属性[J]. 外语教学理论与实践(3): 34-40.
Outlines

/