Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies >

2022 , Vol. 22 >Issue 1: 141 - 152

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.01.012

An Epistemic Inquiry of Teacher Identity Construction through Content-questions in College English Teaching

Expand

Online published: 2022-01-27

Fold

Abstract

Questioning is a common type of discourse in English teaching, but few scholars have studied the issue of teacher identity construction by questioning in teaching. In the meanwhile, epistemics is a hot topic in Western conversation analysis, but few scholars in China have touched upon this issue. In light of this situation, this study, by means of conversation analysis, explores the types pragmatic realizationof and causes for teacher identity construction through content-questions in college English teaching from the perspective of epistemics. The study finds that teachers construct two types of identities (a real questioner and a pretending questioner while knowing the answer) by virtue of content-questions, that they construct these two identities by nine pragmatic strategies, and that they construct these identities because of the consistency or inconsistency between epistemic status and epistemic stance in the target knowledge of a content-question. This study helps to clarify the knowledge distribution of both parties in the content-question sequence in college English teaching, to reveal the causes for teachers’ interactive identities, and to inform the efficiency improvement of question-and-answer interaction in English teaching.

Key words： college English; content-questions; teachers’ identities; Epistemics; Epistemic stance

Cite this article

PENG Zhuo, AN Xiaocan, MA Liwei . An Epistemic Inquiry of Teacher Identity Construction through Content-questions in College English Teaching[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022 , 22(1) : 141 -152 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.01.012

References

[1] Donaghue H. 2018. Relational work and identity negotiation in critical post observation teacher feedback[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 135(8):101-116.
[2] Dyer, J.& D. Keller-Cohen. 2000. The discursive construction of professional self through narratives of personal experience[J]. Discourse Studies 2(3):283-304.
[3] Hayano K. 2013. Question design in conversation[A]. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (eds.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis[C]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 395-414.
[4] Heritage J. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge[J]. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1):1-29.
[5] Heritage J. 2018. The ubiquity of epistemics: A rebuttal to the ‘Epistemics of Epistemics’ Group[J]. Discourse Studies 20(1):14-56.
[6] Heritage J.& G. Raymond. 2012. Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions[A]. In J. P. de Ruiter (ed.). Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 179-192.
[7] Jefferson G. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction[A]. In G. H. Lerner (ed.).Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation [C]. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 13-31.
[8] Juzwik, M. M.& D. Ives. 2010. Small stories as resources for performing teacher identity: Identity-in-interaction in an urban language arts classroom[J]. Narrative Inquiry 20(1):37-61.
[9] Michalovich, A.& H. Netz. 2018. Tag-naxon? (Tag-Right?) in instructional talk: Opening or blocking learning opportunities[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 137(11):57-75.
[10] Raymond, G.& J. Heritage. 2006. The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren[J]. Language in Society 35(5):677-705.
[11] Richards K. 2006. ‘Being the Teacher’: Identity and classroom conversation[J]. Applied Linguistics 27(1):51-77.
[12] Sacks H., E. A. Schegloff& G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation[J]. Language 50(4):696-735.
[13] Schegloff E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis Volume 1[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14] 陈新仁. 2014. 语用学视角下的身份研究——关键问题与主要路径[J]. 现代外语 (5):702-710.
[15] 郭奕彤、 江颖. 2020. 英语教师语用身份的话语构建:一项个案研究[J]. 外语教育研究前沿 (1):68-76.
[16] 兰良平、 韩刚. 2013. 教师身份构建——课堂提问遭遇沉默的会话分析[J]. 外语界 (2):59-68.
[17] 彭卓. 2020. 知识论视角下婚姻问题热线异议中的知识站位维护[J]. 外语与外语教学 (3):92-106.
[18] 孙咏梅. 2013. 研究生导师组集体身份的话语建构研究——以导师组“我们”的使用为例[J]. 外语与外语教学 (6):11-14.
[19] 田笑、 黄金声. 2015. 建构观下课堂会话身份研究——从Zimmerman会话身份理论到对外汉语示范课堂[J]. 华文教学与研究 (4):66-76.
[20] 徐敏、 陈新仁. 2015. 课堂语境下大学英语教师的身份建构及顺应性[J]. 外语教学 (3):50-54.
[21] 于国栋、 吴亚欣. 2019. 知识论视角下的“提问”[J]. 外语教学理论与实践 (1):39-47.
[22] 袁舒雯、 邵光华、 魏春梅. 2013. 教师课堂身份显现的现象学反思[J]. 教师教育研究 (5):62-66.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉