Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies >
National Consciousness in Foreign Language Education and the Interdisciplinary and Cross-boundary Integrated Development of the Discipline of Foreign Language and Literature
With some major readjustments in the intension of disciplinaries and increased awareness of serving national strategies and social needs, the discipline of foreign language and literature (DFLL) has seen accelerated integration with other disciplines in recent years. Many emerging strategic opportunities such as the effort toward the new liberal arts, the establishment of interdisciplinary study as China’s 14th disciplinary category, and in particular, the establishment of area studies, originally one of the five major research fields of the DFLL, now as a primary discipline under the cross-disciplinary category, has raised fresh questions and posed new challenges to the development of the DFLL in the new era. These opportunities reveal the urgency and importance of the pushing back of disciplinary boundaries and the promotion of interdisciplinary research on the basis of a stronger DFLL per se. To this end, it is necessary to clarify, construct and highlight the following five dimensions in top-level strategic design regarding the DFLL: how to raise the national consciousness of those in the DFLL and their initiative to promote national foreign language capability and responsibility to respond to China’s economic and social needs; how to construct a knowledge system and a discourse system with Chinese characteristics; how to balance the knowledge of the humanities, social sciences and natural sciences, realize the renewal of knowledge structure, and open the interdisciplinary research in the era of the techno-humanities; how to achieve cross-boundary integration and advance area studies; how to highlight cultural exchanges between China and other countries and mutual learning between heterogeneous civilizations. In short, a sure path of the DFLL’s innovation of the epistemic and discourse system lies in its serving the country’s strategy and safeguarding national interests, communicating the rationale for China’s theory and practice of global governance to the global community with its strong capabilities in foreign language and culture and area studies hardly rivaled by other disciplines, building a discourse system with Chinese characteristics for external communication, and facilitating Sino-foreign people-to-people exchanges, mutual learning and dialogue between civilizations on an equal footing.
WANG Yinquan . National Consciousness in Foreign Language Education and the Interdisciplinary and Cross-boundary Integrated Development of the Discipline of Foreign Language and Literature[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022 , 22(1) : 27 -46 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.01.002
| [1] | 德雷克·博克. 2008. 回归大学之道[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社. |
| [2] | 郭世荣. 2021. 总序[A]. 清代科技史丛书[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社. |
| [3] | 何毅亭. 2020. 习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想与中国话语建构[N]. 学习时报(10-28):(01). |
| [4] | 李志东. 2021. 外语学科国别与区域研究:发展与挑战[J]. 外语学刊 (1):59-65. |
| [5] | 梁占军. 2021. 世界史域下的国别区域研究[N]. 光明日报(12-13):(14). |
| [6] | 刘禾. 2000. 欧洲路灯光影以外的世界——再谈西方学术新近的重大变革[J]. 读书 (5):66-74. |
| [7] | 刘利民. 2009. 科学规划外语教育切实服务国家战略[N]. 光明日报(03-03):(09). |
| [8] | 钱乘旦、 胡莉. 2020. 区域与国别研究视野下的“欧洲研究”——关于欧洲研究发展方向的讨论[J]. 欧洲研究 38(04):138-150,8. |
| [9] | 徐浩然、 张冠玉. 2021. 推动自然科学与人文社会科学交叉融合[N]. 学习时报(08-04):(06). |
| [10] | 杨枫. 2019a. 高等外语教育的国家意识、跨学科精神及应用理念[J]. 当代外语研究 (2):1-2. |
| [11] | 杨枫. 2019b. 外语研究的问题意识与理论建构[J]. 当代外语研究 (4):1-4. |
| [12] | 杨枫. 2020. 外语教育国家意识的文化政治学阐释[J]. 当代外语研究 (6):1-2. |
| [13] | 杨枫. 2021. 知识翻译学宣言[J]. 当代外语研究(5): 1,27. |
| [14] | 张国刚. 2021. 谈谈中外关系史研究[N]. 中国社会科学报 04-19:(04). |
| [15] | 赵国月、 周领顺、 潘文国. 2017. 翻译研究的“中国学派”:现状、理据与践行——潘文国教授访谈录[J]. 翻译论坛 (2):9-15. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |