Investigating Legitimization in Political Discourse from the Perspective of CMA:An Analysis of the US Governmental Discourse on China-US Trade Talks

Expand

Online published: 2022-09-13

Abstract

Critical Metaphor Analysis integrates Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Critical Discourse Analysis, and pragmatics, and thereby connects discourse and society seamlessly through conceptual metaphor, which is one of the effective ways to analyze political discourse. This paper takes 31 Sino-US trade texts on the US government websites as data, and analyzes the legitimization of the US policy toward China from the perspective of Critical Metaphor Analysis. It is shown that the US government,through fabricating a political myth, constructs China as a BULLY, while the United States as a VICTIM, and Trump is constructed as a FIGHTER. This metaphorical system replaces complex political facts and becomes a way for Americans to understand the Sino-US trade war. It is hoped that this study may, through refining the Critical Metaphor Analysis method, enrich the legitimization research approach, and provide useful references for the construction of China’s foreign discourse system.

Cite this article

WU Jianguo, XIE Sisi, LI Jing . Investigating Legitimization in Political Discourse from the Perspective of CMA:An Analysis of the US Governmental Discourse on China-US Trade Talks[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022 , 22(4) : 111 -122 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.04.011

References

[1] Charteris-Black J. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
[2] Charteris-Black J. 2009. Metaphor and political communication[A]. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (eds.). Metaphor and Discourse [C]. London: Palgrave Macmillan.97-115.
[3] Charteris-Black J. 2014. Analyzing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor[M]. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
[4] Fauconnier G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[5] Lakoff G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[6] Musolff A. 2019. Brexit as ‘having your cake and eating it’[A]. In V. Koller, S. Kopf & M. Miglbauer (eds.). Discourses of Brexit [C]. London: Routledge. 208-221.
[7] Skinner D. & R. Squillacote. 2010. New bodies: Beyond illness, dirt, vermin and other metaphors of terror[A]. In U. Okulska & P. Cap (eds.). Perspectives in Politics and Discourse[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 43-60.
[8] The White House. 2018a. President Donald J. Trump is confronting China’s unfair trade policies[EB/OL].[2022-06-25]. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-confronting-chinas-unfair-trade-policies/.
[9] The White House. 2018b. What they are saying: Support for President Donald J. Trump’s section 301 trade actions[EB/OL]. [2022-6-25]. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/saying-support-president-donald-j-trumps-section-301-trade-actions/.
[10] The White House. 2018c. WTAS: Support for president Donald J. Trump’s plan to protect American farmers from unjustified trade retaliation[EB/OL]. [2022-6-25]. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/wtas-support-president-donald-j-trumps-plan-protect-american-farmers-unjustified-trade-retaliation/.
[11] 汪徽、 辛斌. 2019. 美国媒体对中国形象的隐喻建构研究[J]. 外语教学 (3): 32-38.
[12] 武建国、 龚纯、 宋玥. 2020. 政治话语的批评隐喻分析——以特朗普演讲为例[J]. 外国语 (3): 84-93.
Outlines

/