Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies >
Multimodal Discourse Analysis: A New Paradigm of Teacher Discourse Research
Multimodal discourse analysis should become a new paradigm of teacher discourse research. It is an cross-disciplinary study of linguistics, pedagogy and computer science, which aims to analyze the process of how teachers make a mixed use of different symbol resources to achieve teaching objectives and the interaction mechanism between different symbol resources. The core of the research route is to determine the annotation scheme and form the analytical framework. In this multimodal discourse analysis, the Elan labeling scheme is formed from the starting point of “establishing research perspective” in tieto-truth modeling. Based on this scheme, the raw corpus is processed and annotated and a multi-modal teacher corpus is built. Then a structural frame of reference is constructed based on the relationship between the two sets of modes, namely “intensification - non-intensification” and “complementation-non-complementation”, on which forming a “ framework for modal interaction analysis of teacher discourse” is based. This framework is used as a tool of multi-modal analysis of teacher discourse. With the help of this new paradigm, the multi-modal corpus of famous foreign language teachers can be constructed to highlight the special attributes of famous teachers, so as to promote the formation of multidimensional teaching evaluation ideas, and contribute to the creation of “golden lessons” in a comprehensive and precise way.
Key words: multimodal; discourse analysis; teacher’s discourse; paradigm
YANG Yi, CHEN Changlai . Multimodal Discourse Analysis: A New Paradigm of Teacher Discourse Research[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022 , 22(4) : 144 -153 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.04.014
| [1] | Chaudron C. 1977. A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors[J]. Language Learning 27:29-46. |
| [2] | Flanders N.A. 1970. Analyzing Teacher Behavior[M]. Boston: Addison-Wesley. |
| [3] | Jewitt C.,J. Bezemer K. Halloran. 2016. Introducing,Multimodality[M]. London: Routledge. |
| [4] | Knight D. 2009. A Multi-modal Corpus Approach to the Analysis Back Channeling Behavior[D]. Nottingham: The University of Nottingham. |
| [5] | Long M. H. 1983. Training the second language teacher as classroom researcher[A]. In J.E.Alatis,H.H. Stern & P. D.Strevens(eds.).Applied Linguistics and the Preparation of Second Language Teachers: Towards a Rationale [C]. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 281-297. |
| [6] | 顾曰国. 2013. 论言思情貌整一原则与鲜活话语研究——多模态语料库语言学方法[J]. 当代修辞学(6):1-19. |
| [7] | 顾曰国. 2015. 多模态感官系统与语言研究[J]. 当代语言学(4):1-22. |
| [8] | 顾曰国、 张永伟. 2013. 静态图像库的信息检索与知识本体[J]. 当代语言学(2):214-229,252. |
| [9] | 黄立鹤. 2015. 语料库4.0:多模态语料库建设及其应用[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报(3):1-7,48,161. |
| [10] | 黄立鹤、 张德禄. 2019. 多核并行架构:多模态研究的范式、路径及领域问题之辨[J]. 外语教学(1):21-26. |
| [11] | 鲁林岳. 2009. 名师名校长培训体系的构想与实践[J]. 教育研究(2):103-107. |
| [12] | 牟智佳. 2020. 多模态学习分析:学习分析研究新生长点[J]. 电化教育研究(5):27-32,51. |
| [13] | 吴安萍. 2019. 大数据、跨学科与多模态话语研究[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社. |
| [14] | 熊英. 2017. 基础教育阶段教师评价:现状、问题及对策[J]. 教育理论与实践(36):40-42. |
| [15] | 余文森、 宋原、 丁革民. 2019. “课堂革命”与“金课”建设[J]. 中国大学教学(9):22-28. |
| [16] | 张德禄. 2009. 多模态话语分析综合理论框架探索[J]. 中国外语(1):24-30. |
| [17] | 朱永生. 2007. 多模态话语分析的理论基础与研究方法[J]. 外语学刊(5):82-86. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |