Articles

The Textual Function of the English Double Predicate Clause—The Logogenesis and Instantial System

Expand

Online published: 2023-02-24

Abstract

This paper aims to look into the textual function of the English double-predicate clause within the framework of systemic functional grammar with special reference to logogenesis and instantial system. To understand textual function, it is necessary to understand text, to understand the relation between text and system, and to understand how text is generated. This calls for a clear idea of logogenesis and instantial system that are indispensable in the creation of meaning in the course of the unfolding of text. We outline how logogenesis works through contextual specification, semantic generation and lexico-grammatical generation in creating the texts by analyzing Text 1 and Text 2,and bringing to light the difference between the two in terms of resonance between logogenetic patterns.In addition, we show how instantial system operates in creating and revising the text by analyzing Text 3a and Text 3b,and showing how Text 3b selects the appropriate options to improve what Text 3a is inadequate for. Text1 and Text 3b indicate that the DP clause serves the textual function by expressing non-volitional result.As the multiple aspects of the meaning of the clause combine to contribute to its textual function,it may express such niceties of meaning as temporary unusual result or temporary contingent result.

Cite this article

REN Shaozeng . The Textual Function of the English Double Predicate Clause—The Logogenesis and Instantial System[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2023 , 23(1) : 41 -59 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2023.01.005

References

[1] Ghodessy M. (ed.). 1995. Thematic Development in English Texts[M]. Printer: London and New York.
[2] Halliday M.A.K., A. McIntosh & P. Strevens. 1964. The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching[M]. London: Longmans,Green & Co., Ltd.
[3] Halliday M. A. K.& R. Hasan.1985/1989. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of language in a Social-semiotic Perspective[M]. Oxford:OUP.
[4] Halliday M. A. K. 1992. Systemic grammar and the concept of“science of language”[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报)(2): 1-9.
[5] Halliday M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn.)[M]. London: Edward Arnold.
[6] Halliday M.A. K.& C. M. Matthiessen. 2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn.)[M]. London: Edward Arnold.
[7] Halliday M. A. K. 2007. Language and Society[M]. London & New York: Continuum.
[8] Halliday M. A. K. & C. M. Matthiessen. 1999a. Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition[M]. London & New York: Continuum.
[9] Halliday M. A. K. & C. M. Matthiessen. 1999b. Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step Into The Theory[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
[10] Halliday M.A. K. & C. M. Matthiessen. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar(4th edn.)[M]. London: Edward Arnold.
[11] Halliday M. A. K. 2007. Language and Society[M]. London & New York: Contunuum.
[12] Halliday M. A. K. 2008. Complementarities in Language[M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
[13] Jespersen O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar[M]. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
[14] Jespersen O. 1925. Mankind, Nation and Individual[M]. Oslo: Aschehong.
[15] Lyons J. 1968. An Introduction to General Linguistics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[16] Matthissen C. M. 1995. Theme as an enabling resource in ideational‘knowledge’construction [A]. In M. Ghodessy(ed.).Thematic Development in English Texts[C]. London & New York:Pinter.20-47.
[17] Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., M. 2010. Key Terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics[M]. London: Continuum.
[18] van Dijk D. A. 1985. Semantic Discourse Analysis [A]. In van Dijk(ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis[C]. London:Academic Press, INC. 103-112.
[19] Saussure F. 1960. Course in General Linguistics(English version)[M]. London: Peter Owen Limited.
[20] 任绍曾. 2021. 英语双重谓语句的语篇性[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报)(3): 2-13.
[21] 任绍曾. 2022. 英语双重谓语的语义蕴含[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报)(2): 2-19.
Outlines

/