Articles

The Textual Function of the Double Predicate Clause—The Basic-level Topic and the Semantic Structure

Expand

Online published: 2023-02-24

Abstract

This paper aims to study the textual function of the double predicate clause with special reference to the basic-level topic and its semantic structure from a cognitive-functional approach. The preliminary research results show that the immediate discourse environment in which the DP clause functions is made up of the prior process that goes before it and the ending process that comes after it. A detailed study is conducted of the prior process, including the resonance it imparts to the DP clause, the linguistic forms it takes and the ways it is related with the DP clause. As the emergent pattern may acquire added value in the context of situation, it follows that the context may imply the prior process for the DP clause. In fact, different kinds of context may cause the emergence of the DP clause. A careful study is also made of the ending process, including what the DP clause expects of it, the linguistic forms it takes and the semantic functions it performs. All this brings to light the full view of the complicated environment in which the DP clause operates. And this is in fact how the DP clause performs its function in various settings in discourse.

Cite this article

REN Shaozeng . The Textual Function of the Double Predicate Clause—The Basic-level Topic and the Semantic Structure[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2023 , 23(1) : 60 -84 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2023.01.006

References

[1] Chafe W. 1980. The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative [A]. In W. Chafe. The Pear Stories [C]. Norwood: Ablex.9-48.
[2] Chafe W. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[3] Halliday M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn.)[M]. London: Edward Arnold.
[4] Halliday M. A. K. & R. Hasan. 1985/1989. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective[M]. Oxford: OUP.
[5] Halliday M.A. K. & C. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn.)[M]. London: Edward Arnold.
[6] Halliday M. A. K. & C. M. Matthissen. 1999a. Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition[M]. London & New York: Continuum.
[7] Halliday M. A. K. & C. M. Matthissen. 1999b. Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step Into The Theory[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
[8] Jespersen O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar[M]. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
[9] Jespersen O. 1960. Selected Writings of Otto Jespersen[M]. London: George Alien & Unwin Ltd.
[10] Lakoff G.& M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphor We Live By[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[11] Langacker R.W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[12] Langacker R.W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[13] Langacker R.W. 2001. Discourse in cognitive grammar[J]. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2): 143-188.
[14] Martin J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure[M]. Philadelphia / Amsterdam: Benjamins.
[15] Thompson S.& W.Mann. 1987. Rhetorical structure theory: A framework for the analysis of text[J]. Pragmatic (1): 79-105.
[16] 任绍曾. 2018. 话语分析面面观[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
[17] 任绍曾. 2021. 英语双重谓语的语篇性[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报)(3):2-19.
Outlines

/