Articles

Metacognitive Engagement of Chinese College Students in English Deep Reading:An Empirical Study Based on Digital Footprint

Expand

Online published: 2023-11-16

Abstract

Currently, digital reading has become a fashionable form of reading, deeply influencing the reading behavior of college students and leading to a scarcity of deep reading. From the perspective of metacognitive engagement theory, deep reading is closely related to metacognitive engagement. Developing a scale of metacognitive engagement in English reading based on digital footprints can help examine the status of deep reading in readers. By constructing the scale and conducting empirical research on the digital footprints of students from multiple universities in English reading, the results show that the metacognitive engagement of Chinese college students in English reading is insufficient. Individual differences are mainly reflected in the aspects of timing and strategy in the behavior engagement, as well as the aspects of concentration and persistence in the thinking engagement. There is an overall lack of emotional engagement, and deep reading has not been universally achieved. The design of the scale of metacognitive engagement provides references for the optimization of digital reading platforms and the exploration of the pathways to promote English deep reading.

Cite this article

CHEN Dongchun, DENG Yujie . Metacognitive Engagement of Chinese College Students in English Deep Reading:An Empirical Study Based on Digital Footprint[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2023 , 23(5) : 83 -92 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2023.05.008

References

[1] Flavell, J. H. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry[J]. American Psychologist 34 (10): 906-911.
[2] Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld & A. H. Paris. 2004. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence[J]. Review of Educational Research 74 (1):59-109.
[3] Khosa, D. K. & S. E. Volet. 2014. Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: Can it explain differences in students’ conceptual understanding?[J]. Metacognition and Learning 9(3):287-307.
[4] Nelson, T. O. 1996. Consciousness and metacognition[J]. American Psychologist (2):102-116.
[5] Schaufeli, W. B., M. Salanova, V. Gonzalez-roma, et al. 2002. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies 3(1):71-92.
[6] 柴阳丽. 2016. 社会化批注对大学生数字化深阅读影响的实证研究[J]. 现代远程教育研究(2):107-112.
[7] 董奇. 1989. 论元认知[J]. 北京师范大学学报(1):68-74.
[8] 郭晓娜、 霍小琴. 2019. 深度阅读:人工智能时代的知识创造方式[J]. 人民教育(18):62-65.
[9] 黄荔. 2013. 论互联网时代的深度阅读重拾[J]. 广西社会科学(2):173-175.
[10] 教育部高等教育司. 2004. 大学英语课程教学要求(试行)[M]. 外语教学与研究出版社.
[11] 李艳燕、 彭禹、康佳, 等. 2020. 在线协作学习中小组学习投入的分析模型构建及应用[J]. 中国远程教育(2): 40-48,77.
[12] 李子建、 宋萑. 2007. 建构主义:理论的反思[J]. 全球教育展望(4):44-51.
[13] 毛刚、 周跃良. 2019. 学习者习惯性行为中的元认知投入水平计算研究[J]. 电化教育研究(6):68-75.
[14] 毛刚、何文涛、俞向军. 2020. 基于数字足迹的阅读元认知投入研究[J]. 数字教育(2):38-43.
[15] 潘双林. 2012. 网络阅读深度化的实践探索[J]. 中国电化教育(4):110-112.
[16] 瞿莉莉. 2014. 基于有声思维法的EFL阅读策略与元认知意识研究[J]. 外语界(4):30-38.
[17] 唐明、 李松林. 2020. 聚焦意义建构的语文深度阅读教学[J]. 中国教育学刊(5):60-65.
[18] 汪玲、 郭德俊. 2000. 元认知的本质与要素[J]. 心理学报(4):458-463.
[19] 王洪江、李作锟、廖晓玲, 等. 2022. 在线自主学习行为何以表征元认知能力——基于系统性文献综述及元分析方法[J]. 电化教育研究(6):94-103.
[20] 王会珍. 2020. 新媒体时代深度阅读推广的优化进路[J]. 中国出版(3):41-45.
[21] 王铭玉、 陈勇、金华, 等. 2013. 现代语言符号学[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆.
[22] 徐锦芬、 范玉梅. 2019. 社会认知视角下的外语学习者投入研究[J]. 外语教学(5):39-43,56.
[23] 张晓峰、李明喜、俞建慧, 等. 2020. 面向学习云空间的认知投入量化研究[J]. 中国远程教育(5):18- 28,76-77.
[24] 张杨. 2017. 网络视域下大学生深度阅读模式优化研究[J]. 中国成人教育(1):21-24.
[25] 朱原谅. 2010. 基于元认知的网络阅读研究[J]. 图书情报工作(2):59-61,103.
Outlines

/