Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies >
The Element Structure and Characteristics of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Competence of University English Teacher Educators
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Competence of university English teacher educators has its unique constituent elements, hierarchical structure and characteristics. By means of the Literature Research Method, the Interviewing Method, the Delphi Method and the Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the paper makes an exploration and discovers that their SoTL Competence is composed of 4 first-level indicators, 12 second-level indicators and 27 third-level indicators. The 4 first-level indicators include the ability to establish SoTL concepts, the ability to apply SoTL knowledge, the ability to develop English SoTL and the influencing ability of English SoTL. Disciplinarity, demonstration, integration, interaction and practice are their main characteristics. These ability elements of different levels are different from each other, but they are interrelated and complement each other. As a whole, they develop from basic level to high level and show a pyramid structure, which possesses the features of hierarchy and discrimination.
DENG Xinzhen, DU Jing, REN Zhifen . The Element Structure and Characteristics of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Competence of University English Teacher Educators[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2023 , 23(6) : 136 -146 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2023.06.014
| [1] | Boyer E.L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered:Priorities of the Professoriate[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
| [2] | Malcolm T. 2018. Tracking the scholarship of teaching and learning[J]. Policy Reviews in Higher Education 2(1):61-78. |
| [3] | Shulman L. 2000. From Minsk To Pinsk: Why A Scholarship of Teaching And Learning[J]. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 1(1):48-53. |
| [4] | Trigwell K.,E. Martin & T. Benjamin, et al. 2002. Scholarship of Teaching: A Model[J]. Higher Education Research & Development (2): 155-168. |
| [5] | 刘鹂. 2016. 论教师教育者教学能力要素、结构与特征[J]. 课程·教材·教法 36(9): 95-101. |
| [6] | 刘喆. 2022. 什么是大学教师“教学学术能力”:内涵与发展路径[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) 40(10):54-64. |
| [7] | 颜建勇、 郭剑鸣、 李丹. 2022. 论大学教师教学学术能力内涵特征[J]. 集美大学学报(教育科学版) 23(1):7-13. |
| [8] | 杨枫. 2019. 外语研究的问题意识与理论建构[J]. 当代外语研究(4):1-4. |
| [9] | 杨枫. 2022. 学术创新从改变学术话语开始[J]. 当代外语研究(6):2. |
| [10] | 杨枫. 2023. 语言之殇与学术之衰[J]. 当代外语研究(1):1-2. |
| [11] | 张艳. 2016. 高校英语教师后续课程资源开发现状研究[J]. 当代外语研究(2): 63-68. |
| [12] | 郑安云、 郭雨. 2018. 学术道德教育实践模式创新研究[J]. 理论导刊(8):107-112. |
| [13] | 周光礼、 马海泉. 2013. 教学学术能力:大学教师发展与评价的新框架[J]. 教育研究 34 (8):37-47. |
| [14] | 朱为鸿、 周守军. 2022. 基于教学公共性的新时代大学教师教学道德建设[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版) 43(3):207-214. |
| [15] | 朱炎军. 2021. 高校卓越教师教学学术能力的结构模型研究——基于扎根理论的研究方法[J]. 高教探索(7): 57-64. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |