Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies >
FLC-based Ideological and Political Education and the Promotion of China’s International Communication Discourse System: The Case of the English Translation of“人类命运共同体”
Foreign language education in the new era should promote the organic and effective combination of foreign language course-based (FLC-based for short) ideological and political education, explore the theoretical basis and practical path of FLC-based ideological and political education, give full play to the function of foreign language courses in cultivating talents, integrate and highlight the value of Chinese civilization and Chinese culture, demonstrate the superiority of the socialist system with Chinese characteristics, and provide new ideas, new categories and new expressions for improving China’s ability to participate in global governance. The term a human community with a shared future demonstrates China’s commitment to solving global issues and its determination to promote shared development of the world. By taking the diachronic changes in the English translation of “a human community with a shared future” as an example, this article expounds the reasons behind the changes over the past decade in the English translation of this important political concept and accounts for China’s emphasis on building an international discourse system with Chinese characteristics and its unremitting efforts to enhance a good national image. It goes on to propose that doing a good job in the translation and teaching of political terms in foreign language classrooms is the mission of strengthening FLC-based ideological and political education so as to achieve synchronous effects in ideological and political education, professional ability improvement, and the construction of China’s international discourse system.
HWANG Wenhui, WANG Yinquan . FLC-based Ideological and Political Education and the Promotion of China’s International Communication Discourse System: The Case of the English Translation of“人类命运共同体”[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024 , 24(2) : 45 -57 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2024.02.004
| [1] | Hu J. 2012. Firmly March on the Path of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics and Strive to Complete the Building of a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects-Report to the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China[EB/OL].[2024-3-15]. http://www.china.org.cn/china/18th_cpc_congress/2012-11/16/content_27137540_11.htm. |
| [2] | Xi J. 2017. Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects and Strive for the Great Success of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era-Delivered at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Patty of China[EB/OL].[2024-3-15]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/special/2017-11/03/c_136725942.htm. |
| [3] | Xi J. 2022. Hold High the Great Banner of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics and Strive in Unity to Build a Modern Socialist Country in All Respects-Report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China[EB/OL]. [2024-3-15]. https://english.www.gov.cn/news/topnews/202210/25/content_WS6357df20c6d0a757729e1bfc.html. |
| [4] | 常晨光、 周慧、 曾记. 2021. 国别与区域研究课程中的课程思政——理念与实践[J]. 中国外语(2):78-83. |
| [5] | 程海东. 2021. 服务于对外话语体系建构的翻译课程思政体系建设研究[J]. 国际公关(1):135-137. |
| [6] | 范大祺、 孙琳. 2023. 中国特色对外话语体系建设视域下的译者思政意识实践路径初探[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报(1):80-90. |
| [7] | 高祖贵. 2023. 人类命运共同体理念的丰富意蕴和重大价值[N]. 人民日报(5-22):9. |
| [8] | 郭惠民. 2021. 国际传播能力建设与构建人类命运共同体[J]. 传媒评论(7):9-11. |
| [9] | 何莲珍. 2022. 大学外语课程思政之“道”与“术”[J]. 中国外语(4):1,12-14. |
| [10] | 胡锦涛. 2012. 坚定不移沿着中国特色社会主义道路前进为全面建成小康社会而奋斗——在中国共产党第十八次全国代表大会上的报告[M]. 北京: 人民出版社. |
| [11] | 刘瑾. 2020. 外语专业课程思政建设的两个坐标[N]. 中国社会科学报(4-23):1. |
| [12] | 单程秀、 张凤阳. 2022. 马克思恩格斯文本中的“公社”概念[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学)(1):15-25,157. |
| [13] | 施思. 2023. 中华优秀传统文化与人类命运共同体理念的逻辑关系与价值融[EB/OL].[2024-3-15]. https://www.cssn.cn/skgz/bwyc/202305/t20230516_5638422.shtml. |
| [14] | 王磊. 2020. 中国对外话语体系建设:意义、任务与策略[J]. 中央社会主义学院学报(2):53-60. |
| [15] | 王银泉. 2017. 做好政治话语翻译提升国际话语权[N]. 学习时报(11-27):4. |
| [16] | 王新影、 张嘉欣. 2022. 人类命运共同体理念融入大学生担当意识培育的三重维度[DB/OL].[2024-3-15]. https://www.cssn.cn/mkszy/mkszy_pyxsd/202209/t20220913_5494777.shtml. |
| [17] | 文秋芳. 2021. 大学外语课程思政的内涵和实施框架[J]. 中国外语(2):47-52. |
| [18] | 习近平. 2017. 决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[M]. 北京: 人民出版社. |
| [19] | 习近平. 2022. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M]. 北京: 人民出版社. |
| [20] | 谢莉、 王银泉. 2018. 中国国际形象建构视域下的政治话语翻译研究[J]. 外语教学(5):7-11. |
| [21] | 徐锦芬. 2021. 高校英语课程教学素材的思政内容建设研究[J]. 外语界(2):18-24. |
| [22] | 杨枫. 2019. 高等外语教育的国家意识、跨学科精神及应用理念[J]. 当代外语研究(2):1. |
| [23] | 杨枫. 2020. 外语教育国家意识的文化政治学阐释[J]. 当代外语研究(6):1. |
| [24] | 杨庆龙. 2020. 构建人类命运共同体的国际政治社会学论析[J]. 社会主义研究(3):125-132. |
| [25] | 周安平. 2018. 人类命运共同体概念探讨[J]. 法学评论(4):17-29. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |