Examining Reporting Verbs in the PolyU Language Bank and Corpus of Research Articles: A Case Study of “Show”, “Indicate” and “Demonstrate”

Expand

Online published: 2024-08-13

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the use of three reporting verbs: “show”, “indicate” and “demonstrate” in the PolyU Learner English Corpus (PLEC) and Corpus of Research Articles (CRA),respectively. PLEC is a learner corpus with a collection of undergraduates’ assignments. The writers in the PLEC are university students who are English learners. By comparison,CRA is a collection of research articles,and the writers in CRA represent advanced English users. This study adopted a corpus-based method based on quantitative and qualitative analyses to examine the differences and similarities in using three reporting verbs between PLEC and CRA. By comparing these three words in two corpora,the similarities and differences regarding the employment of these three reporting verbs by two levels of English groups are outlined. The findings reveal that the use of three reporting verbs: “show”, “indicate” and “demonstrate” between CRA and PLEC share some similarities among them. However,“indicate”,“show” and “demonstrate” are synonyms with similar lexical meanings. They cannot fully be replaced with each other. Some unique patterns for the use of the three above reporting verbs are also identified,indicating the different preferences for English learners and advanced users.

Cite this article

WU Yuxi, WANG Cong . Examining Reporting Verbs in the PolyU Language Bank and Corpus of Research Articles: A Case Study of “Show”, “Indicate” and “Demonstrate”[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024 , 24(4) : 179 -190 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2024.04.016

References

[1] Baker P. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis[M]. London: Continuum.
[2] Biber D. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers[M]. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
[3] Bloch J. 2010. A concordance-based study of the use of reporting verbs as rhetorical devices in academic papers[J]. Journal of Writing Research (2): 219-244.
[4] Charles M. 2006. The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross disciplinary study of theses[J]. Applied Linguistics 27(3): 492-518.
[5] Cheng W. 2012. Exploring Corpus Linguistics: Language in Action[M]. Abingdon: Routledge.
[6] Durrant P. 2017. Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories[J]. Applied Linguistics 38(2): 165-193.
[7] Hunston S. 2002. Corpora in Applied Linguistics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Hyland K. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles[M]. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins
[9] Hyland K. 2002. Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing [A]. In J. Flowerdew (ed.). Academic Discourse[M]. Harlow, England: Longman. 115-130.
[10] Hyland K. 2008. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation[J]. English for Specific Purposes 27(1): 4-21.
[11] McCarthy M. J. & F. O’Dell. 2008. Academic Vocabulary in Use[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Rodman L. 1994. The active voice in scientific articles: Frequency and discourse functions[J/OL]. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 24(3): 309-331. [2024-05-08]. 10.2190/D9BR-CAP2-LW5N-LCRP.
[13] Sinclair J. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[14] Stubbs M. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics[M]. Oxford,England: Blackwell.
[15] Thompson G. & Y. Ye. 1991. Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers[J]. Applied Linguistics 12(4): 365-382.
[16] Walsh. S. 2010. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (1st edn.)[M]. London: New York, NY: Routledge.
Outlines

/