Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies >
Triple Considerations for Developing High-Level Interdisciplinary Foreign Language Professionals from the Perspective of Global Governance: A Review of Foreign Languages Planning in China from the Perspective of Global Governance
With the deepening of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), China’s participation in global governance has increased, leading to a growing demand for high-level interdisciplinary foreign language talents. Through a review of Foreign Languages Planning in China from the Perspective of Global Governance, the article explores the fundamental educational questions of “whom to train, how to train, and for whom to train,” offering insights into the strategic positioning, pathways, and objectives for global governance talent development. In response, triple considerations are proposed:(1)aligning talent development with national strategic needs, (2)building a comprehensive interdisciplinary foreign language training framework, and(3)deepening the “major + foreign languages” model. Therefore, scientifically informed foreign language planning is crucial for developing high-level talents that align with national strategies, promoting paradigm innovation in foreign language education, and addressing the evolving demands for interdisciplinary professionals in global governance.
CHANG Shaohua , DING Qingyun . Triple Considerations for Developing High-Level Interdisciplinary Foreign Language Professionals from the Perspective of Global Governance: A Review of Foreign Languages Planning in China from the Perspective of Global Governance[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024 , 24(6) : 177 -183 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2024.06.016
| [1] | Hogan-Brun, G. 2012. Language planning in urban spaces[J]. Current Issues in Language Planning 13(3):145-147. |
| [2] | Ricento, T. 2000. Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning[J]. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(2):196-213. |
| [3] | 崔军. 2017. 讲好中国经济故事:难在哪?怎么讲?[J]. 对外传播(3):10-12. |
| [4] | 戴炜栋、 张雪梅. 2007. 对我国英语专业本科教学的反思[J]. 外语界(4):2-11. |
| [5] | 胡文仲、 孙有中. 2006. 突出学科特点,加强人文教育——试论当前英语专业教学改革[J]. 外语教学与研究(5):243-247. |
| [6] | 李琪. 2020. 污名化中国在中亚地区的舆情成因与化解路径[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 49(5):5-24. |
| [7] | 李宇明. 2010. 中国外语规划的若干思考[J]. 外国语(1):2-8. |
| [8] | 李宇明. 2018. 语言在全球治理中的重要作用[J]. 外语界(5):2-10. |
| [9] | 刘海涛. 2007. 语言规划的动机分析[J]. 北华大学学报(社会科学版)(4):63-68. |
| [10] | 刘天伦. 1996. 培养目标与可利用资源——有关培养复合型英语人才的思考[J]. 外语界(1):1-5. |
| [11] | 沈骑. 2023. 全球治理视域下的中国外语规划[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社. |
| [12] | 束定芳. 2014. 外语课堂教学中的问题与若干研究课题[J]. 外语教学与研究 46(3):446-455. |
| [13] | 谭卫国. 2000. 我国外语专业教育改革势在必行[J]. 中国高教研究(9):83-84. |
| [14] | 文秋芳. 2016. “一带一路”语言人才的培养[J]. 语言战略研究 1(2):26-32. |
| [15] | 文秋芳. 2019. 对“国家语言能力”的再解读——兼述中国国家语言能力70年的建设与发展[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)(5):57-67. |
| [16] | 肖华锋、 卢婷. 2019. 从“外语通”到“外国通”——关于我国外语人才培养战略转型的思考[J]. 当代外语研究(5):26-31. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |