A Study of National Rhetorical Competence in Science and Technology Communication from the Perspective of Constitutive Rhetoric Theory

  • JU Yumei
Expand

Online published: 2025-03-20

Abstract

National rhetoric is essentially a practice of constitutive rhetoric and is closely related to its core assumptions and areas of study. The construction of national rhetorical competence in the field of science and technology communication is an important part of national rhetoric, which directly determines the international communication effect of China’s science and technology development and the construction of national image. Starting from the perspective of constitutive rhetoric theory, this article analyzes three aspects related to the construction of national rhetorical competence in science and technology communication, including national rhetoric awareness, goals and strategies, and focuses on discussing the ways to implement national rhetorical strategies from three aspects: the value identification strategy of constructing a rhetorical ecology integrating science and technology and culture, the opposition identification strategy of challenging the “Western-centrism” discourse pattern, and the style identification strategy of creating a constructive journalism style with Chinese characteristics. In the current situation of global science and technology competition, the theoretical and practical research on national rhetorical competence in the field of science and technology communication will be further emphasized.

Cite this article

JU Yumei . A Study of National Rhetorical Competence in Science and Technology Communication from the Perspective of Constitutive Rhetoric Theory[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2025 , 25(2) : 55 -64 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2025.02.005

References

[1] Burke, K. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature and Method[M]. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
[2] Burke, K. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives[M]. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
[3] Charland, M. 1987. Constitutive rhetoric: The case of the people Québécois[J]. Quarterly Journal of Speech 73 (2): 133-150.
[4] Charland, M. 2001. Constitutive rhetoric [A]. In T. O. Sloane (ed.). Encyclopedia of Rhetoric[C]. New York: Oxford University Press. 616-619.
[5] Hermans, L. & C. Gyldensted. 2019. Elements of constructive journalism: Characteristics, practical application and audience valuation[J]. Journalism 20 (4): 535-551.
[6] Jasinski, J. 2001. Sourcebook on Rhetoric: Key Concepts in Contemporary Rhetorical Studies[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[7] Perelman, C. & L. O. Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation[M]. Notre Dame: University of Norte Dame Press.
[8] 陈汝东. 2012. 论国家修辞学[J]. 江淮论坛 (3): 15-19, 29.
[9] 陈淑君、 魏在江. 2024. 建设性新闻的多模态和谐架构研究——以《人民日报》对灾难性事件的报道为例[J]. 中国外语 (3): 27-38.
[10] 冯智强. 2021. 语言自信驱动下的十九大报告国家政治修辞英译[J]. 当代外语研究 (5): 40-50.
[11] 胡范铸、 薛笙. 2010. 作为修辞问题的国家形象传播[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (6): 35-40.
[12] 鞠玉梅. 2023. 科技新闻建构国家身份认同研究——基于“科技冬奥”中外媒体新闻报道的个案分析[J]. 当代修辞学 (5): 57-67.
[13] 鞠玉梅. 2024. 科技新闻的情感话语与修辞建构——基于载人航天科技新闻的个案分析[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报) (5): 23-31.
[14] 孔祥永. 2015. “他者”想象与美国的焦虑[J]. 美国研究 (4): 69-88.
[15] 刘婵君、 沈玥晨. 2022. 共识兼顾与集体取向: 中国主流媒体建设性新闻实践——关于人民日报微博官方账号新冠肺炎疫情报道的分析[J]. 新闻与传播研究 (4): 21-37.
[16] 刘华杰. 2004. 论科普的立场与科学传播的信条[J]. 自然辩证法研究 (8): 76-80.
[17] 刘亚猛. 2004. 追求象征的力量: 关于西方修辞思想的思考[M]. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店.
[18] 蒙象飞. 2016. 中国国家形象与文化符号传播[M]. 北京: 五洲传播出版社.
[19] 史安斌、 王沛楠. 2019. 建设性新闻: 历史溯源、理念演进与全球实践[J]. 新闻记者 (9): 32-39, 82.
[20] 温馨. 2022. 二十世纪德国思想界的中国观[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)(1): 149-159.
[21] 翟杰全. 2002. 让科技跨越时空: 科技传播与科技传播学[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社.
Outlines

/