Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies >
The Global Transformation of Dietary Etiquette in Zuo Zhuan: The Co-translation from the Perspective of the Four-Dimensional Framework of Knowledge Circulation
Research on the English translation of the Zuo Zhuan has long focused on translation strategies and comparisons among different versions, while insufficient attention has been paid to the mechanisms through which the global transformation of its embedded “local knowledge” occurs. Drawing on the four-dimensional knowledge transformation framework of Transknowletology and the principles of “truth, virtue, and beauty”, this paper examines the translation strategies of three categories of dietary etiquette—“serving the ruler”, “hosting others” and “self-cultivation”—in the co-translation. The framework comprises four stages: “de-localization”, through which highly contextualized local practices are distilled into explicit concepts that can be understood across cultures; “re-localization”, which emphasizes reconstructing the semantic network of knowledge within the target language’s cognitive framework and achieve cross-cultural adaptation; “trans-localization”, which promotes the circulation of knowledge across multiple systems and its entry into dialogue, thereby generating a networked ecology of knowledge; and “globalization” the stage at which knowledge transcends its context of origin and becomes a globally shared public resource. The study finds that, through de-localization, the co-translation strips the highly contextualized ritual formalities of the context and distills such core concepts as “symbols of power”, “ritualized interaction” and “moral self-discipline”; through re-localization, it reconstructs the semantic network of this knowledge by means of annotation, in-text explication, and related strategies; and it further brings these forms of knowledge into trans-local global dialogue, ultimately moving toward broad worldwide acceptance. The organic synergy among the three translators’ academic backgrounds, cultural identities, and collaborative mode also helps ensure that the translation embodies “truth, virtue, and beauty”. This study reveals the distinctive mechanism by which local knowledge in narrative classics undergoes global transformation: such transformation requires not only conceptual distillation but also narrative reconfiguration. It provides a methodological point of reference for the application of knowledge translation studies in the fields of literature and historiography.
HUANG Qin , DANG Liangjun . The Global Transformation of Dietary Etiquette in Zuo Zhuan: The Co-translation from the Perspective of the Four-Dimensional Framework of Knowledge Circulation[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026 , 26(2) : 115 -127 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2026.02.009
| [1] | Durrant S., W. Y.Li & D. Schaberg. 2016. Zuo Tradition / Zuozhuan: Commentary on the “Spring and Autumn Annals”[M]. Seattle: University of Washington Press. |
| [2] | 崔凌霄. 2025. 知识翻译学视域下地方性与世界性的互动关系[J]. 当代外语研究(5):115-122. |
| [3] | 杜世洪、 王渝. 2021. 生态翻译学的还原论与整体论思考[J]. 当代外语研究(1):86-96. |
| [4] | 黄剑. 2025. 再论知识翻译学翻译生产三原则——“以真求知”“以善立义”“以美行文”之内涵与路径[J]. 当代外语研究(3):13-24. |
| [5] | 潘艳艳. 2025. 知识、传播与翻译——处在交汇点的知识翻译学[J]. 当代外语研究(5): 106-114. |
| [6] | 魏泓. 2019. 《左传》《史记》等中国典籍在西方的翻译与研究——美国著名汉学家杜润德教授访谈录[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报)(3):94-101. |
| [7] | 杨枫. 2021a. 知识翻译学宣言[J]. 当代外语研究(5):2,27. |
| [8] | 杨枫. 2021b. 翻译是文化还是知识?[J]. 当代外语研究(6):2,36. |
| [9] | 杨枫. 2022. 知识的地方性与翻译的世界性[J]. 当代外语研究(3):1-2. |
| [10] | 杨枫、 李思伊. 2024. 真善美:作为方法论的中和翻译[J]. 中国翻译(1): 9-15,189. |
| [11] | 杨枫. 2025. 从地方性到世界性:对外传播话语体系的范式转型与国际话语权构建[J]. 当代外语研究(6):1-9. |
| [12] | 袁丽梅. 2022. 知识翻译学的理论立场与批评视角——由知识翻译学中的“知识”说起[J]. 当代外语研究(4):13-21. |
| [13] | 岳峰、 陈泽予. 2022. 从知识翻译学的真、善、美标准谈知识翻译学的英语译名[J]. 当代外语研究(3):65-73. |
| [14] | 张生祥. 2022. 基于知识翻译学的翻译研究与知识转化[J]. 当代外语研究(2):58-67. |
| [15] | 张树国、 南伟、舒蓉. 2006. 钟鸣鼎食中的上古诗——西周初年礼制变革与《诗经》祭享诗的原始关联[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版)(4):54-59. |
| [16] | 左丘明. 1990. 春秋左传注(杨伯峻编注)[M]. 北京: 中华书局. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |