Between Faithfulness and Pragmatism: The Knowledge Reconstruction in Lin Shu’s Translations—Dual Perspectives of Transknowletology and Translator Behavior Criticism

  • LI Jiayi
Expand

Online published: 2026-05-22

Abstract

Transknowletology defines translation as “the worldwide reproduction of local knowledge”. Examining Lin Shu’s translations through this lens reveals a seemingly paradoxical phenomenon: his most “unfaithful” translations turned out to be the most knowledge-productive. Using “behavior-knowledge” as a framework, this study views translator behavior as the observable manifestation of knowledge reconstruction. By analyzing behavioral choices, it uncovers the process through which knowledge is identified, selected, transformed, and embedded into a foreign culture during its cross-linguistic journey, thereby achieving an ascent from behavioral description to knowledge analysis. The study finds that in his translations of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Joan Haste, and The Old Curiosity Shop, Lin Shu systematically “localized” the narrative, ethical, and belief knowledge embedded in Western novels through strategies such as thematic reconstruction, stylistic domestication, and ethical adaptation, granting them new forms of life within the social context of late Qing China. This practice can be conceptualized as the “Lin Shu paradigm”, wherein social needs serve as the primary selection criterion, cultural dignity acts as the guiding principle, and reader reception functions as the ultimate measure of effectiveness. This paper provides historical insights into the knowledge-reconstructive function of translation and opens up possibilities for dialogue between transknowletology and translator behavior criticism.

Cite this article

LI Jiayi . Between Faithfulness and Pragmatism: The Knowledge Reconstruction in Lin Shu’s Translations—Dual Perspectives of Transknowletology and Translator Behavior Criticism[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026 , 26(2) : 140 -149 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2026.02.011

References

[1] 狄更斯. 1914. 孝女耐儿传(卷一)(林纾、魏易译)[M]. 上海: 商务印书馆.
[2] 方梦之. 2021. 我国译学话语体系的勃兴之路[J]. 当代外语研究(1):29-37.
[3] 方梦之、 庄智象. 2017. 中国翻译家研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
[4] 哈葛得. 2017. 迦茵小传(林纾、魏易译)[M]. 北京: 朝华出版社.
[5] 梁启超. 1997. 论小说与群治之关系[A]. 陈书良选编.梁启超文集[C]. 北京: 北京燕山出版社. 287.
[6] 钱锺书. 1979. 旧文四篇[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社.
[7] 斯土活. 1981. 黑奴吁天录(林纾、魏易译)[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆.
[8] 杨枫. 2021a. 知识翻译学宣言[J]. 当代外语研究(5): 2,27.
[9] 杨枫. 2021b. 翻译是文化还是知识?[J]. 当代外语研究(6):2,36.
[10] 杨枫. 2022. 知识的地方性与翻译的世界性[J]. 当代外语研究(3):1-2.
[11] 杨枫. 2025. 从地方性到世界性:对外传播话语体系的范式转型与国际话语权构建[J]. 当代外语研究(6): 1-9.
[12] 杨枫. 2026. 知识翻译学视阈下对外传播范式重构与实践路径[J]. 外语导刊(1):111-117.
[13] 杨丽. 2025. 别求新声于异邦:清末民初商务印书馆的外国小说译介出版——以《说部丛书》为例[J]. 当代外语研究(5): 170-177.
Outlines

/