Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies >
From Fact to Mind Truth: Construction of Epistemic Translation’s Truth System
Artificial intelligence’s remarkable capabilities in processing factual knowledge prompt Transknowletology to re-examine the connotation of “true knowledge” and highlight the unique value of human translators. Drawing on Wang Yangming’s philosophy of mind, this paper builds upon the “factual truth” in Transknowletology to propose and systematically interpret the concept of “mind-nature truth,” thereby constructing a two-dimensional theoretical framework of “true knowledge.” “Factual truth” ensures the factual accuracy of knowledge processing, serving as the foundational dimension of translation. “Mind-nature truth”, emphasizing the translator’s spiritual transformation and poetic reconstruction of cultural images through the practice of zhì liángzhī (extending innate moral knowledge), represents the transcendent dimension. Instead of two separate truths, they are the objective and subjective dimensions of truth, forming a dialectical unity of foundation and transcendence, instrument and value, technology and humanity, and achieving ontological integration in the translator’s practice of “extending innate moral knowledge”. Through a comparative analysis of AI’s limitations and the human translator’s mind-nature transformation in rendering core cultural images in the poem Life in Jianghu, this paper reveals that while AI can efficiently convey “factual truth”, only human translators with mind-nature understanding can attain the translational realm of “consonance with innate moral knowledge”. Reader reception validation further confirms the distinctive value of the “mind-nature truth” pathway in three aspects: mind-nature resonance, avoidance of negative connotations, and highest recognition. This paper provides a theoretical pivot for the humanistic turn of Transknowletology in the AI era and offers a mind-nature pathway for the in-depth practice of disseminating Chinese culture abroad.
Key words: Transknowletology; factual truth; mind-nature truth; zhì liángzhī; AI translation
YANG Zhenyuan . From Fact to Mind Truth: Construction of Epistemic Translation’s Truth System[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2026 , 26(2) : 55 -66 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2026.02.004
| [1] | Benjamin W. 2021. The translator’s task [A]. In L. Venuti (ed.). The Translation Studies Reader (4th edn.)[C]. Oxon: Routledge. 89-97. |
| [2] | Robinson D. 2006. The Translator’s Turn[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. |
| [3] | Steiner G. 2001. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. |
| [4] | 陈来. 2020. 宋明理学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社. |
| [5] | 杜世洪、 帕提曼·木哈塔尔. 2025. 人工智能时代知识翻译的人学问题[J]. 当代外语研究(5):48-59. |
| [6] | 黄剑. 2025. 再论知识翻译学翻译生产三原则——“以真求知”“以善立义”“以美行文”之内涵与路径[J]. 当代外语研究(3):13-24. |
| [7] | 孔令翠、 李春兰、 邓丽娜. 2024. 中西哲学视域下知识与知识翻译学的建构[J]. 当代外语研究(4):95-107. |
| [8] | 潘文国. 2023. 翻译研究的新突破[J]. 外语电化教学(1):7-10,106. |
| [9] | 覃江华. 2022. 翻译与知识生产、管理和转化——知识翻译学刍议[J]. 当代外语研究(1):60-71. |
| [10] | 王阳明. 2011. 传习录(于自力、孔薇、杨骅骁注译)[M]. 郑州: 中州古籍出版社. |
| [11] | 杨枫. 2021a. 知识翻译学宣言[J]. 当代外语研究(5):2,27. |
| [12] | 杨枫. 2021b. 翻译是文化还是知识?[J]. 当代外语研究(6):2,36. |
| [13] | 杨枫. 2025. 知识是物学,翻译是人学[J]. 当代外语研究(1):1-2. |
| [14] | 杨枫. 2026. 种子与大地的约定——从“知识翻译学宣言”到“五梁十二柱”[J]. 当代外语研究(2):1-8. |
| [15] | 庄子. 2007. 庄子(孙海通译)[M]. 北京: 中华书局. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |