综述

骨髓增生异常综合征分型与预后分层研究进展

展开
  • 上海交通大学医学院第六人民医院血液科,上海 200233
常春康 E-mail: changchunkang7010@aliyun.com

收稿日期: 2023-01-02

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-15

Research progress on classification and prognostic stratification of myelodysplastic syndrome

Expand
  • Department of Hematology, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China

Received date: 2023-01-02

  Online published: 2024-03-15

摘要

骨髓增生异常综合征(myelodysplastic syndrome,MDS)是血液系统中较为常见的一组髓系恶性克隆性疾病。不同分型的MDS患者,其临床表现及自然病程各异,加上历史上不同分型系统及版本的迭代,对其诊断、分型及治疗方案选择造成了一定困扰。随着分子生物学技术的进步,来那度胺、罗特西普、维奈克拉等药物的使用,近年来MDS分型标准与预后积分系统在不断完善细化。在2016年WHO分型标准中,首次引入了分子相关的分型标准(SF3B1),并对5q-进行了再定义,强调了驱动突变的概念。2022年WHO分型标准则在原有基础上更加突出了分子生物学特征,同时关于SF3B1、5q-的亚型也被保留在2022年的WHO分型标准中,并新增了新的分子相关分型亚型(bi-TP53)。新提出的MDS分子国际预后评分系统(the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System,IPSS-M)则在2012年提出的MDS修订版国际预后评分系统(the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System,IPSS-R)的基础上,引入了分子突变作为新的积分标准,并结合了既有的形态学和细胞遗传学特征,使得MDS患者的危险因素分层更加精准和个体化。随着分子靶向药物的不断推出和检验技术的提升,IPSS-M必将不断更新,笔者对近些年的MDS分型标准以及预后分层系统的进展和临床意义进行总结。

本文引用格式

吴多尔, 常春康 . 骨髓增生异常综合征分型与预后分层研究进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2023 , 22(05) : 494 -500 . DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2023.05.012

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a relatively common group of myeloid malignant clonal diseases in the blood system. Different types of MDS patients have different clinical manifestations and natural course, as well as the iterations of different classification systems and versions in history, resulting distress in diagnosis, classification and treatment options. With the advancement of molecular biology technology and the use of Lenalidomide, Luspatercept, Venetoclax and other drugs, the classification criteria and prognostic scoring system of myelodysplastic syndrome have been continuously refined in recent years. In the 2016 WHO classification criteria, a molecular-related classification criterion (SF3B1) was introduced for the first time, and 5q- was redefined, emphasizing the concept of driver mutation. The 2022 WHO classification standard has more prominent molecular biological characteristics based on the original, and the classification of SF3B1 and 5q- has also been retained in the 2022 WHO classification standard. A new molecular correlation classification standard (bi-TP53) has been added to the 2022 WHO classification standard to further improve the classification of MDS patients by clinicians and researchers, reflecting the new trend of future genomics research that guide the precision medicine treatment of MDS. At the same time, the prognostic scoring system for MDS patients is constantly being updated. Based on the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) for Myelodysplastic Syndromes proposed in 2012, the newly proposed Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) for myelodysplastic Syndrome introduces a new prognostic scoring system for MDS patients, the stratification of risk factors in MDS patients is more precise and individualized. With the improvement of molecular targeted drugs and testing technology, IPSS-M will continue to be updated. To this end, we will summarize the classification criteria of MDS in recent years, as well as the progress and clinical significance of the prognostic stratification system.

参考文献

[1] 王蔚. 成人骨髓增生异常综合征和再生障碍性盆血的发病率和预后研究[D]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2010.
  WANG W. A Study on incidence,survival rate and prognostic factors of Myelodysplastic syndrome and aplastic anemia in adults[D]. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2010
[2] 宋陆茜, 常春康. 2023年美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)《骨髓增生异常综合征临床实践指南》(第1版)解读[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2023, 22(2):116-120.
  SONG L Q, CHANG C K. Interpretation of clinical prae-tice guidelines for myelodysplastie syndrome (version 1, 2023) of National Comprehensive Cancer Nerwork(NCCN)[J]. J Diagn Concepts Pract, 2023, 22(2):116-120.
[3] 姚玉前, 戴碧涛. 骨髓增生异常综合征流行病学的研究进展[J]. 儿科药学杂志, 2012, 18(4):4.
  YAO Y Q, DAI B T. Epidemiological Progress of Myelodysplastic Syndrome[J]. J Pediatr Pharm, 2012, 18(4):4.
[4] 肖志坚. 骨髓增生异常综合征的诊断[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2016, 15(6):545-549.
  XIAO Z J. Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome[J]. J Diagn Concept & Pract, 2016, 15(6):545-549.
[5] KHOURY J D, SOLARY E, ABLA O, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms[J]. Leukemia, 2022, 36(7):1703-1719.
[6] ARBER D A, ORAZI A, HASSERJIAN R P, et al. International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data[J]. Blood, 2022, 140(11):1200-1228.
[7] GREENBERG P L, TUECHLER H, SCHANZ J, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. Blood, 2012, 120(12):2454-2465.
[8] BERNARD E, NANNYA Y, HASSERJIAN R P, et al. Implications of TP53 allelic state for genome stability, clinical presentation and outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. Nat Med, 2020, 26(10):1549-1556.
[9] HAASE D, STEVENSON K E, NEUBERG D, et al. TP53 mutation status divides myelodysplastic syndromes with complex karyotypes into distinct prognostic subgroups[J]. Leukemia, 2019, 33(7):1747-1758.
[10] BERNARD E, TUECHLER H, GREENBERG P L, et al. Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes[J]. NEJM Evid, 2022, 1(7):EVIDoa2200008.
[11] JAIN A G, ZHANG L, BENNETT J M, et al. Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Bone Marrow Fibrosis: An Update[J]. Ann Lab Med, 2022, 42(3):299-305.
[12] GREENBERG P L, STONE R M, AL-KALI A, et al. Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2017, 15(1):60-87.
[13] BEJAR R. Prognostic models in myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program, 2013, 2013:504-510.
[14] GREENBERG P, COX C, LEBEAU M M, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. Blood, 1997, 89(6):2079-2088.
[15] MALCOVATI L, DELLA PORTA M G, STRUPP C, et al. Impact of the degree of anemia on the outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and its integration into the WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS)[J]. Haematologica, 2011, 96(10):1433-1440.
[16] ALESSANDRINO E P, DELLA PORTA M G, BACIGALUPO A, et al. WHO classification and WPSS predict posttransplantation outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a study from the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo (GITMO)[J]. Blood, 2008, 112(3):895-902.
[17] PARK M J, KIM H J, KIM S H, et al. Is International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) still standard in predic-ting prognosis in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome? External validation of the WHO Classification-Based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) and comparison with IPSS[J]. Eur J Haematol, 2008, 81(5):364-373.
[18] ZEIDAN A M, KOMROKJI R S. There's risk, and then there's risk: The latest clinical prognostic risk stratification models in myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. Curr Hematol Malig Rep, 2013, 8(4):351-360.
[19] VOSO M T, FENU S, LATAGLIATA R, et al. Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) predicts survival and leukemic evolution of myelodysplastic syndromes significantly better than IPSS and WHO Prognostic Scoring System: validation by the Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie Italian Regional Database[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(21):2671-2677.
[20] GANGAT N, PATNAIK M M, TEFFERI A. Myelodysplastic syndromes: Contemporary review and how we treat[J]. Am J Hematol, 2016, 91(1):76-89.
[21] OK C Y, HASSERJIAN R P, FOX P S, et al. Application of the international prognostic scoring system-revised in therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Leukemia, 2014, 28(1):185-189.
[22] MALCOVATI L, KARIMI M, PAPAEMMANUIL E, et al. SF3B1 mutation identifies a distinct subset of myelodysplastic syndrome with ring sideroblasts[J]. Blood, 2015, 126:233-241. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-633537.
[23] MALCOVATI L, STEVENSON K, PAPAEMMANUIL E, et al. SF3B1-mutant MDS as a distinct disease subtype: a proposal from the International Working Group for the Prognosis of MDS[J]. Blood, 2020, 136(2):157-170.
[24] OGAWA S. Genetics of MDS. Blood[J]. 2019; 133(10):1049-1059.
[25] GANGULY B B, KADAM N N. Mutations of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): An update[J]. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res, 2016, 769:47-62.
[26] WU J, ZHANG Y, QIN T, et al. IPSS-M has greater survival predictive accuracy compared with IPSS-R in persons?≥?60 years with myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. Exp Hematol Oncol, 2022, 11(1):73.
[27] SAUTA E, ROBIN M, BERSANELLI M, et al. Real-World Validation of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(15):2827-2842.
[28] MALCOVATI L, STEVENSON K, PAPAEMMANUIL E, et al. SF3B1-mutant MDS as a distinct disease subtype: a proposal from the International Working Group for the Prognosis of MDS[J]. Blood, 2020, 136(2):157-170.
[29] DELHOMMEAU F, DUPONT S, DELLA VALLE V, et al. Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(22):2289-2301.
[30] CIMMINO L, DOLGALEV I, WANG Y, et al. Restoration of TET2 Function Blocks Aberrant Self-Renewal and Leukemia Progression[J]. Cell, 2017, 170(6):1079-1095.e20.
[31] HUANG F, SUN J, CHEN W, et al. HDAC4 inhibition disrupts TET2 function in high-risk MDS and AML[J]. Aging, 2020, 12(17),16759-16774
[32] FUJINO T, KITAMURA T. ASXL1 mutation in clonal hematopoiesis[J]. Exp Hematol, 2020, 83:74-84.
[33] FANG Y, GUO J, WU D, et al. Integration Analysis of JAK2 or RUNX1 Mutation With Bone Marrow Blast Can Improve Risk Stratification in the Patients With Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 10:610525.
文章导航

/