Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice >
Feasibility study on the portal vein imaging using non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with flow inversion recovery sequence in the cirrhotic portal hypertension
Received date: 2020-02-01
Online published: 2022-07-14
Objective: To compare the efficacy of the non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NC-MRA) with flow inversion recovery (FIR) sequence and contrast enhancement MRA(CE-MRA) on portal vein imaging in the cirrhotic portal hypertension. Methods: Twenty patients diagnosed as the cirrhotic portal hypertension by the clinical criteria or radiology were enrolled, and CE-MRA with fast field echo 3D coronal imaging and NC-MRA with FIR were performed to display the portal vein system, respectively. The imaging quality of the portal vein, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein in the portal vein system on NC-MRA was compared with CE-MRA, and the signal-to-noise ratios of images the were calculated. Results: The width of the main portal vein and splenic vein measured by NC-MRA was not different from CE-MRA(P value was 0.330 and 0.090, respectively), and the scores of the imaging quality in splenic vein and proximal superior mesenteric vein had no difference either(P=0.677, P=0.077). The imaging quality showed the clarity and the smooth degree in the portal vein and the branches of grade 1-2 on NC-MRA was superior to CE-MRA. However, the cases with image quality score ≥3 detected by NC-MRA were less than CE-MRA (9 vs 17, P=0.008), indicating CE-MRA had advantage in displaying distal veins over NC-MRA. The signal intensity and signal-to-noise ratios on NC-MRA were higher than CE-MRA(P=0.040, P<0.01). Conclusions: The NC-MRA with FIR sequence could clearly display the main blood vessels of the portal vein system in patients with the portal hypertension and shows similar efficacy as CE-MRA. NC-MRA with FIR sequence could be used as a safe and invasive method for displaying the portal vein system in spite of the lower efficacy on displaying distal veins.
WANG Lijuan, PAN Zilai, SU Wenting, XU Jingci, RAO Min, LIU Xiao . Feasibility study on the portal vein imaging using non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with flow inversion recovery sequence in the cirrhotic portal hypertension[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2020 , 19(05) : 494 -498 . DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2020.05.009
[1] | Xiao J, Wang F, Wong NK, et al. Global liver disease burdens and research trends: Analysis from a Chinese perspective[J]. J Hepatol, 2019, 71(1):212-221. |
[2] | 邢金子, 刘爱连, 王艺, 等. 1.5T磁共振IFIR技术对肝门静脉成像的初探[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2011, 22(3):218-220. |
[3] | Heilmaier C, Sutter R, Lutz AM, et al. Mapping of hepa-tic vascular anatomy: dynamic contrast-enhanced parallel MR imaging compared with 64 detector row CT[J]. Radio-logy, 2007, 245(3):872-880. |
[4] | Nchimi A, Biquet JF, Brisbois D, et al. Duplex ultrasound as first-line screening test for patients suspected of renal artery stenosis: prospective evaluation in high-risk group[J]. Eur Radiol, 2003, 13(6):1413-1419. |
[5] | Amet S, Launay-Vacher V, Clément O, et al. Incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients undergoing dialysis after contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium-based contrast agents: the Prospective Fibrose Nephrogénique Systémique study[J]. Invest Radiol, 2014, 49(2):109-115. |
[6] | Stafford RB, Sabati M, Mahallati H, et al. 3D non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography with balanced steady-state free precession Dixon method[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2008, 59(2):430-433. |
[7] | 竺笛, 邹显伦, 陈晓, 等. 非对比剂增强磁共振血管成像评价门静脉血流动力学的可行性研究[J]. 磁共振成像, 2018, 9(3):202-207. |
[8] | 汤浩, 王秋霞, 孟晓岩, 等. 非对比剂增强MR血管成像技术在门静脉成像中的应用[J]. 放射学实践, 2014, 29(12):1434-1438. |
[9] | 宋琼, 曾蒙苏, 陈财忠, 等. 肝硬化患者非增强与增强MR门静脉血管成像的图像质量和诊断价值[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2013, 47(2):127-131. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |