论著

自身免疫性脑炎抗体谱系特征与合并肿瘤对预后的影响

  • 万文斌 ,
  • 谢冲 ,
  • 姚小英 ,
  • 张瑛 ,
  • 王刚
展开
  • 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院神经内科,上海 200127
王 刚  E-mail:wanggang@renji.com

收稿日期: 2025-08-28

  录用日期: 2025-09-24

  网络出版日期: 2025-12-26

版权

《内科理论与实践》编辑部, 2025, 版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。

Characteristics of autoimmune encephalitis antibody profiles and the impact of coexisting tumors on prognosis

  • WAN Wenbin ,
  • XIE Chong ,
  • YAO Xiaoying ,
  • ZHANG Ying ,
  • WANG Gang
Expand
  • Department of Neurology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China

Received date: 2025-08-28

  Accepted date: 2025-09-24

  Online published: 2025-12-26

Copyright

, 2025, Copyright reserved © 2025.

摘要

目的:探讨自身免疫性脑炎(autoimmune encephalitis,AE)患者的临床特征、抗体类型、治疗时机及肿瘤合并情况对疗效与预后的影响,为临床管理提供参考。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2025年6月在上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院神经内科收治的203例AE患者的临床资料,收集其性别、年龄、病程、抗体类型及肿瘤筛查情况进行统计分析,评估上述因素对治疗效果的影响。同时,采用AE临床评估量表(clinical assessment scale for autoimmune encephalitis,CASE)评分系统对患者疗效进行评估。结果:共纳入203例AE患者,男性占56.2%,中位年龄50岁,亚急性病程为主(64.0%)。抗体谱呈现高度异质性,以抗N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体(N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor,NMDAR)抗体最常见(24.1%)。急性期治疗后总体改善率为79.8%,而显著改善率仅为11.3%。肿瘤合并率为15.3%,合并肿瘤的患者疗效略低于非肿瘤组。结论:AE的疗效受抗体特性、治疗时机、疾病严重程度及是否合并肿瘤等多种因素影响,及时免疫治疗对预后具有显著影响,早诊断、早治疗有助于改善预后。精准的抗体检测和系统的肿瘤筛查是改善AE患者预后的重要策略,未来临床管理应加强对上述因素的综合评估,以实现最佳治疗效果和改善患者长期预后。

本文引用格式

万文斌 , 谢冲 , 姚小英 , 张瑛 , 王刚 . 自身免疫性脑炎抗体谱系特征与合并肿瘤对预后的影响[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2025 , 20(05) : 365 -370 . DOI: 10.16138/j.1673-6087.2025.05.03

Abstract

Objective This study aims to investigate the impact of clinical characteristics, antibody types, timing of treatment, and tumor comorbidities on the efficacy and prognosis of patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE), aiming to provide a reference for clinical management. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 203 AE patients admitted to the Department of Neurology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, from January 2020 to June 2025. Statistical analysis was performed on patients’ gender, age, disease course, antibody types, and tumor screening results to evaluate their impact on treatment efficacy. Additionally, the clinical assessment scale for autoimmune encephalitis (CASE) scoring system was used to assess treatment outcomes. Results A total of 203 AE patients were included in the study, in which 56.2% cases were male, a median age was 50 years, and most of the disease course was subacute (64.0%). The antibody profiles showed high heterogeneity, with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibodies being the most common (24.1%). Treatment outcomes revealed that an overall improvement rate is 79.8%, but the significant improvement rate was only 11.3%. The tumor comorbidity rate was 15.3%, and the efficacy of treatment in patients with tumors was slightly lower than that of the non-tumor group. Conclusions The efficacy of AE treatment is influenced by multiple factors, including antibody characteristics, timing of treatment, disease severity, and tumor comorbidities. Timely immunotherapy significantly impacts prognosis, and early diagnosis and treatment can improve clinical outcomes. Precise antibody testing and systematic tumor screening are crucial strategies for promoting the prognosis of AE patients. Future clinical management should strengthen comprehensive assessment of the above factors to achieve optimal treatment outcomes and enhance long-term prognosis.

参考文献

[1] Irani SR. Autoimmune encephalitis[J]. Continuum (Minneap Minn), 2024, 30(4): 995-1020.
[2] Dalmau J, Graus F. Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis: utility and pitfalls for antibody-negative disease[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2023, 22(6): 529-540.
[3] Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R, et al. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2016, 15(4): 391-404.
[4] Rosenfeld MR, Titulaer MJ, Dalmau J. Paraneoplastic syndromes and autoimmune encephalitis: five new things[J]. Neurol Clin Pract, 2012, 2(3): 215-223.
[5] Bost C, Chanson E, Picard G, et al. Malignant tumors in autoimmune encephalitis with anti-NMDA receptor antibodies[J]. J Neurol, 2018, 265(10): 2190-2200.
[6] Nguyen L, Wang C. Anti-NMDA receptor autoimmune encephalitis: diagnosis and management strategies[J]. Int J Gen Med, 2023, 16: 7-21.
[7] Gong S, Han Y, He E, et al. Coexistence of anti-SOX1 and anti-GABAB receptor antibodies with paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis presenting with seizures and memory impairment in small cell lung cancer: a case report[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13: 955170.
[8] 中华医学会神经病学分会神经感染性疾病与脑脊液细胞学学组. 中国自身免疫性脑炎诊治专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2022, 55(9): 931-949.
  Chinese Society of Neuroinfectious Diseases and Cerebrospinal Fluid Cytology. Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of autoimmune encephalitis (2022 edition)[J]. Chin J Neurol, 2022, 55(9): 931-949.
[9] Kerstens J, Schreurs MWJ, de Vries JM, et al. Autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes: a nationwide study on epidemiology and antibody testing performance[J]. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm, 2024, 11(6): e200318.
[10] Nissen MS, Ryding M, Meyer M, et al. Autoimmune encephalitis: current knowledge on subtypes, disease mechanisms and treatment[J]. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets, 2020, 19(8): 584-598.
[11] Dalmau J, Armangué T, Planagumà J, et al. An update on anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis for neurologists and psychiatrists: mechanisms and models[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2019, 18(11): 1045-1057.
[12] Rodriguez A, Klein CJ, Sechi E, et al. LGI1 antibody encephalitis: acute treatment comparisons and outcome[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2022, 93(3): 309-315.
[13] Dutra LA, Abrantes F, Toso FF, et al. Autoimmune encephalitis: a review of diagnosis and treatment[J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 2018, 76(1): 41-49.
[14] Platt MP, Agalliu D, Cutforth T. Hello from the other side: how autoantibodies circumvent the blood-brain barrier in autoimmune encephalitis[J]. Front Immunol, 2017, 8: 442.
[15] Konopka A, Jaz K, Kap?on K, et al. Autoimmune encephalitis as a possible reason for psychiatric hospitalisation in the teenage population[J]. Psychiatr Pol, 2023, 57(4): 843-852.
[16] Hermetter C, Fazekas F, Hochmeister S. Systematic review: syndromes, early diagnosis, and treatment in autoimmune encephalitis[J]. Front Neurol, 2018, 9: 706.
[17] Lancaster E. The diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune encephalitis[J]. J Clin Neurol, 2016, 12(1): 1-13.
[18] Wesselingh R, Broadley J, Buzzard K, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of drug-resistant epilepsy in autoimmune encephalitis[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2022, 132: 108729.
[19] Lee WJ, Lee HS, Kim DY, et al. Seronegative autoimmune encephalitis: clinical characteristics and factors associated with outcomes[J]. Brain, 2022, 145(10): 3509-3521.
[20] Huang T, Liu F, Wang B, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis in patients with neuronal surface antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis: a single-center cohort study in China[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14: 1213532.
[21] Ghimire P, Khanal UP, Gajurel BP, et al. Anti-LGI1, anti-GABABR, and anti-CASPR2 encephalitides in Asia: a systematic review[J]. Brain Behav, 2020, 10(10): e01793.
[22] Binks S, Uy C, Honnorat, et al. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: a practical approach to diagnosis and management[J]. Pract Neurol, 2022, 22(1): 19-31.
[23] Macher S, Zimprich F, De Simoni D, et al. Management of autoimmune encephalitis: an observational monocentric study of 38 patients[J]. Front Immunol, 2018, 9: 2708.
文章导航

/