Journal of Internal Medicine Concepts & Practice >
Efficacy and safety of selective granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease
Received date: 2022-06-03
Online published: 2023-02-27
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of granulocyte and monocyte apheresis(GMA) in the patients of moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease(IBD). Methods Thirty-eight patients of moderate to severe IBD received GMA treatment at our hospital from May 2013 to September 2021 were enrolled, which included 28 cases of ulcerative colitis(UC) and 10 cases of Crohn disease(CD); and the data were analyzed retrospectively. The indexes including patients’ disease clinical activity scores [Mayo score, CD activity index(CDAI) score], endoscopic activity scores [UC endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) score, Mayo endoscopic (MES) score, Baron score, CD endoscopic index of severity(CDEIS) score], changes in laboratory tests, and adverse events were compared before and 2 weeks after GMA treatment. Results After GMA treatment, the overall clinical response rate in 38 patients was 79% and remission rate was 42%; in which, the efficacy rate in 28 UC patients was 82%(n=23), and 10(36%) patients were in remission; the efficacy rate in 10 CD patients was 70% (n=7), and 6 (60%) cases were in remission. In UC patients, GMA significantly decreased Mayo score, UCEIS score, MES and Baron score. In CD patients, GMA significantly decreased CDAI score and CDEIS score(P<0.05). In all patients with IBD, GMA significantly increased the level of hemoglobin (Hb) and albumin (Alb), and reduced C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and defecate frequency (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil (N)%, lymphocyte(L)%, monocyte (M)%, platelet (PLT) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR) level before and after treatment. The GMA-related severe adverse events were not observed. Conclusions GMA was effective and highly safe for the patients of moderate to severe IBD, while further randomized controlled trials in larger samples still need to be done as considering small case number in our research.
CHEN Ying, ZHANG Chenli, YAO Weiyan . Efficacy and safety of selective granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Journal of Internal Medicine Concepts & Practice, 2022 , 17(06) : 441 -446 . DOI: 10.16138/j.1673-6087.2022.06.004
[1] | Windsor JW, Kaplan GG. Evolving epidemiology of IBD[J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2019, 21(8): 40. |
[2] | Schreiner P, Neurath MF, Ng SC, et al. Mechanism-based treatment strategies for IBD[J]. Inflamm Intest Dis, 2019, 4, 79-96. |
[3] | Lai YM, Yao WY, He Y, et al. Adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis in the treatment of ulcerative colitis[J]. Gut Liver, 2017, 11(2): 216-225. |
[4] | 中华医学会消化病学分会炎症性肠病学组. 炎症性肠病诊断与治疗的共识意见(2018年·北京)[J]. 中华炎性肠病杂志, 2018, 2(3): 173-190. |
[5] | Pabla BS, Schwartz DA. Assessing severity of disease in patients with ulcerative colitis[J]. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2020, 49(4): 671-688. |
[6] | Gajendran M, Loganathan P, Catinella AP, et al. A comprehensive review and update on Crohn’s disease[J]. Dis Mon, 2018, 64(2): 20-57. |
[7] | M’Koma AE. Inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022, 58(5): 567. |
[8] | Yamamoto T, Shimoyama T, Umegae S, et al. Endoscopic score vs. fecal biomarkers for predicting relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis after clinical remission and mucosal healing[J]. Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 2018, 9(3): 136. |
[9] | Mohammed Vashist N, Samaan M, Mosli MH, et al. Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 1(1): CD011450. |
[10] | Kanekura T. Clinical and immunological effects of adsorptive myeloid lineage leukocyte apheresis in patients with immune disorders[J]. J Dermatol, 2018, 45(8): 943-950. |
[11] | Litao MK, Kamat D. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein: how best to use them in clinical practice[J]. Pediatr Ann, 2014, 43(10): 417-420. |
[12] | Shimoyama T, Sawada K, Hiwatashi N, et al. Safety and efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis in patients with active ulcerative colitis[J]. J Clin Apher, 2001, 16(1): 1-9. |
[13] | Dignass A, Akbar A, Baumgart DC, et al. Granulocyte/monocyte adsorptive apheresis for the treatment of therapy-refractory chronic active ulcerative colitis[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2018, 53(4): 442-448. |
[14] | Saniabadi AR, Tanaka T, Yamamoto T, et al. Granulomonocytapheresis as a cell-dependent treatment option for patients with inflammatory bowel disease[J]. J Clin Apher, 2019, 34(1): 51-60. |
[15] | Sands BE, Katz S, Wolf DC, et al. A randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled study of granulocyte/monocyte apheresis for moderate to severe Crohn’s disease[J]. Gut, 2013, 62(9): 1288-1294. |
[16] | Kuwaki K, Mitsuyama K, Kaida H, et al. A longitudinal study of FDG-PET in Crohn disease patients receiving granulocyte/monocyte apheresis therapy[J]. Cytotherapy, 2016, 18(2): 291-299. |
[17] | Tanaka T, Okanobu H, Yoshimi S, et al. In patients with ulcerative colitis, adsorptive depletion of granulocytes and monocytes impacts mucosal level of neutrophils and clinically is most effective in steroid na?ve patients[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2008, 40(9): 731-736. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |