论著

保存时间及离心速度对胆汁α淀粉酶活力影响的分析

展开
  • 1.大连医科大学附属第一医院普外三科,大连医科大学中西医结合临床重点学科实验室,辽宁 大连 116011
    2.同济大学附属东方医院胆石病中心,上海 200120

收稿日期: 2020-10-26

  网络出版日期: 2022-07-20

基金资助

辽宁省中医药临床重点学科能力提升建设项目(2019JH8);辽宁省重点研发指导计划项目(10300028)

Analysis of effect of storage time and centrifugation speed on activity of biliary α-amylase

Expand
  • 1. Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University; Key Lab Clinical of Integrative Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Liaoning dalian 116011, China
    2. Cholelithiasis Center, East Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China

Received date: 2020-10-26

  Online published: 2022-07-20

摘要

目的:研究胆汁α淀粉酶保存时间及离心速度改变时活力变化,探讨影响胆汁α淀粉酶稳定性的因素。方法:收集大连医科大学附属第一医院普外三科行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术病人27例。18例通过碘-淀粉比色法,测定胆汁样本于4 ℃保存30 min、3 h、12 h、24 h、72 h和30 d后6组α淀粉酶的活力。9例样本分别以不离心、3 000 r/min和8 000 r/min速度离心,测定3组α淀粉酶的活力。结果:样本于4 ℃保存达到3 h时,胆汁α淀粉酶活力较30 min下降0.73个百分点。保存时间在12~72 h时,胆汁α淀粉酶活力较30 min下降2.11个百分点。保存时间延长至30 d,胆汁α淀粉酶活力较30 min下降3.94个百分点(P>0.05),说明在4 ℃保存30 d内,胆汁α淀粉酶活力无明显变化。样本于离心3 000 r/min后,胆汁α淀粉酶较原液下降0.16%,8 000 r/min后胆汁α淀粉酶活力较原液上升4.74个百分点。离心8 000 r/min较离心3 000 r/min胆汁α淀粉酶活力上升4.91个百分点(P>0.05),说明离心速度不超过8 000 r/min时,胆汁α淀粉酶活力无明显变化。结论:胆汁于4 ℃保存30 d内,离心速度不超过8 000 r/min时,胆汁α淀粉酶活力相对稳定。

本文引用格式

李广明, 刘嘉悦, 张桂信, 李诗洁, 尚东, 陈海龙, 杨玉龙 . 保存时间及离心速度对胆汁α淀粉酶活力影响的分析[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020 , 25(06) : 473 -476 . DOI: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2020.06.006

Abstract

Objective To study the effect of storage time and centrifugation speed on the activity of biliary α-amylase and the factors which affect the activity of α-amylase. Methods A total of 18 cases were randomly selected from 27 cases with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in our hospital. The activity of biliary α-amylase was measured by iodine-starch colorimetry after bile samples were stored at 4℃ for 30 min, 3 h, 12 h, 24 h, 72 h and 30 d respectively, which was to study storage time in 6 groups each 18 cases. The bile samples in other 9 cases were used to study centrifugation speed including one group without sample centrifugation and the other two groups with sample centrifugation at 3 000 r/min or 8 000 r/min respectively. Results The activity of α- amylase decreased 0.73%, 2.11% and 3.94% in the bile stored at 4℃ for 3 h, 12~72 h or stored to 30 d respectively when compared with that stored 30 min (P>0.05), which indicated that the activity of biliary α-amylase did not change significantly for a period of storage 30 d at 4℃. The activity of biliary α- amylase decreased 0.16% after the centrifugation of 3 000 r/min compared with that without centrifugation, and increased 4.74% after the centrifugation of 8 000 r/min. The increase of 4.91% in the activity of biliary α-amylase was found at 8 000 r/min compared with that at 3 000 r/min(P>0.05), which indicated that the activity of biliary α-AMY had no obvious change when the centrifugal speed did not exceed 8 000 r/min. Conclusions The activity of biliary α-amylase would be relatively stable when bile is stored at 4℃ for 30 d and the centrifugal speed is 8 000 r/min or less.

参考文献

[1] 侯坤, 阎波, 艾尼瓦尔亚森, 等. 单纯胆囊结石患者胆囊胆汁淀粉酶改变及其意义探讨[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2017, 29(3):200-202.
[2] Yoshimoto K, Kamisawa T, Kikuyama M, et al. Classification of pancreaticobiliary maljunction and its clinical features in adults[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2019, 26(12):541-547.
[3] Khoury T, Adileh M, Imam A, et al. Parameters sugges-ting spontaneous passage of stones from common bile duct: a retrospective study[J]. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 2019:5382708.
[4] Furey C, Buxbaum J, Chambliss AB. A review of biomarker utilization in the diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis reveals amylase ordering is favored in patients requiring laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Clin Biochem, 2020, 77:54-56.
[5] Azzopardi E, Lloyd C, Teixeira SR, et al. Clinical applications of amylase: novel perspectives[J]. Surgery, 2016, 160(1):26-37.
[6] 燕丽萍. 临床血常规检验中常见的误差问题分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(21):296-297.
[7] 蔡逸婷, 吴文俊, 夏青. 血、尿淀粉酶三种测定方法的参考值调查和临床应用比较[J]. 上海医学检验杂志, 2001, 16(2):106-107.
[8] 王宁丽, 魏鉴腾, 祝潇, 等. 基于碘-淀粉显色的α-淀粉酶抑制剂筛选方法研究及应用[J]. 中国海洋药物, 2017, 36(5):75-78.
[9] 巨邦律, 陈永兵, 张维一, 等. 隐性胰胆逆流在胆囊癌早期诊断中的意义[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2016, 16(1):21-23.
[10] 王利茹, 杨萍, 王海英, 等. 生长抑素对急性胰腺炎患者胰蛋白酶原-2、铜蓝蛋白、淀粉酶和胰腺血流的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2017, 16(19):1925-1928.
[11] Beltrán MA. Pancreaticobiliary reflux in patients with a normal pancreaticobiliary junction: pathologic implications[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2011, 17(8):953-962.
[12] 黄磊, 黄侠, 费哲为, 等. 胆胰管合流异常的胆汁淀粉酶测定及其处理[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2012, 24(4):343-345.
[13] Horaguchi J, Fujita N, Kamisawa T, et al. Pancreatobi-liary reflux in individuals with a normal pancreaticobiliary junction: a prospective multicenter study[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2014, 49(5):875-881.
[14] 吴国栋, 张丰深, 孙海, 等. 急性胆源性胰腺炎患者胆汁淀粉酶变化的临床意义[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2016, 28(3):235-237,262.
[15] Huh CW, Kim HW, Yi SW, et al. Common bile duct stones associated with pancreatobiliary reflux and disproportionate bile duct dilatation[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(34):e7701.
[16] 杨玉龙. 胆胰汇合部疾病的临床思考和诊治策略[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2015, 20(2):102-107.
[17] 杨玉龙. 对隐匿性胰胆反流的研究及探讨[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2019, 24(2):116-120.
[18] Bhagwat VM, Ramachandran BV. Malathion A and B esterases of mouse liver-I[J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 1975, 24(18):1713-1717.
[19] 崔明, 鞠少卿, 景蓉蓉. 标本类型和离心时间对临床常用心肌损伤标志物检测结果的影响[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2017, 14(8):1049-1051.
[20] Xia HT, Wang J, Yang T, et al. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and the formation of adult choledochal cyst following cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015, 94(47):e2088.
[21] 慈娟娟, 陈建平. 先天性胆总管囊肿与胆管癌的关系[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(21):227-229.
[22] Singh VK, Yadav D, Garg PK. Diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis: a review[J]. JAMA, 2019, 322(24):2422-2434.
[23] Rustagi T, Jamidar PA. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) -related adverse events: post-ERCP pancreatitis[J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2015, 25(1):107-121.
[24] 吴卫泽, 张圣道. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的发展和现况[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(4):273-276.
文章导航

/