Original article

Effectiveness and safety of ERCP in treatment of hemophilia A patients: a report of 7 cases

Expand
  • Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

Received date: 2017-05-17

  Online published: 2019-06-25

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of ERCP in treatment of hemophilia A patients. Methods The data of 7 cases with hemophilia A including 5 cases mild type and 2 cases moderate type in our hospital performed ERCP from December 2013 to March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Five cases had choledocholithiasis including 1 case combined with biliary infection and other 2 cases with biliary obstruction of pancreatic head cancer. Anti-hemophilic globulin (AHG) was given perioperatively combined with accurate monitor of coagulation factor level as well as vital signs. Results There were 2 cases with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and bile duct stone removal, 2 cases with endosco-pic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal, 2 cases with endoscopic metal biliary drainage and 1 case with endosco-pic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) only. Totally, ENBD was performed for 4 cases of bile duct stone. All patients discharged with hospital stay (9.6± 3.2) (7-16) d. The preoperative FⅧ:C was (18.7%± 11.1%) (1.2%-28.2%) and AHG dose was (2 743± 964) (2 000~4 000) U/d. There was no significant difference in the postoperative hemoglobin (100± 30)(51~131) g/L and hematocrit (0.293± 0.084) (0.160-0.396) when compared with those preoperatively (105± 35) (50-150) g/L and (0.307± 0.097) (0.161-0.423). The postoperative serum amylase was (105± 80)(28-237) U/L. No any ERCP perioperative complications were found including bleeding, gastronintestinal perforation and acute pancreatitis. Conclusions ERCP could be effective and safe for patients with hemophilia A after infusion of AHG and careful monitoring and perioperative treatment.

Cite this article

REN Jiajun, LU Ye, MA Di, WANG Junqing, GONG Xiaoyong, YANG Yuchen, YE Feng, CHEN Yongjun, CHEN Sheng . Effectiveness and safety of ERCP in treatment of hemophilia A patients: a report of 7 cases[J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2019 , 24(03) : 226 -229 . DOI: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2019.03.011

References

[1] Berntorp E, Collins P, D'Oiron R, et al. Identifying non-responsive bleeding episodes in patients with haemophi-lia and inhibitors: a consensus definition[J]. Haemophilia,2011,17(1):e202-e210.
[2] 王学锋, 王鸿利, 杨庆铭, 等. 血友病病人的围手术期处理[J]. 外科理论与实践,2001,6(4):235-236.
[3] Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, et al.Guidelines for the management of hemophilia[J]. Haemophilia,2013,19(1):e1-e47.
[4] Itoi T, Tsuyuguchi T, Takada T, et al.TG13 indications and techniques for biliary drainage in acute cholangitis (with videos)[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci,2013,20(1):71-80.
[5] Eckhardt CL, van der Bom JG, van der Naald M, et al. Surgery and inhibitor development in hemophilia A: a systematic review[J]. J Thromb Haemost,2011,9(10):1948-1958.
[6] Franchini M, Lippi G.Prevention of inhibitor development in hemophilia A in 2016. A glimpse into the future?[J]. Thromb Res,2016,148:96-100.
[7] 方涛林, 马曾辰. 血友病患者外科疾病的手术治疗[J]. 中华外科杂志,2003,41(8):623-626.
[8] Kasper CK, Hemophilia of Georgia USA. Protocols for the treatment of haemophilia and von Willebrand disease[J]. Haemophilia,2000,6 Suppl 1:84-93.
[9] Solimeno LP, Escobar MA, Krassova S, et al.Major and minor classifications for surgery in people with hemophi-lia: a literature review[J]. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost,2018, 24(4):549-559.
[10] Mathews V, Viswabandya A, Baidya S, et al.Surgery for hemophilia in developing countries[J]. Semin Thromb Hemost,2005,31(5):538-543.
[11] Weinberg BM, Shindy W, Lo S. Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2006(4):CD004890.
Outlines

/