Original article

Analysis of risk factors for positive circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer

Expand
  • Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China

Received date: 2019-11-04

  Online published: 2022-07-20

Abstract

Objective To explore the higher risk factors for positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) in rectal cancer. Methods The patients with rectal cancer undergoing surgery in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between January 2006 to April 2018 were collected, and 71 patients with positive CRM were included in positive group in this study. One hundred forty-two patients with negative CRM as negative group were matched by random number method with a ratio of 2∶1. Clinicopathologic analysis was done for positive group compared with negative group. Uni and multifactorial analysis assessed the risk factors for positive CRM. Results It was shown by univariate analysis of two groups that significantly different factors were distance of tumor to the anal verge (P<0.001), surgery type (P<0.001), differentiation extent (P<0.001), lymphovascular invasion P=0.001), perineural invasion (P<0.001), T stage (P<0.001), N stage (P=0.001), TNM stage (P<0.001), and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.049). Patients in CRM positive group had higher locoregional recurrence rate(P=0.001), higher distant metastases rate (P<0.001) and less overall survival (P<0.001) compared with those in negative group. Multifactorial analysis demonstrated that poor differentiation (OR=4.415; 95% CI: 1.906-10.224; P=0.001), perineural invasion (OR=3.344; 95% CI: 1.431-7.817; P=0.005) and T3-T4 in pathological stage (OR=3.225; 95% CI: 1.026-10.142; P=0.045) were independent higher risk factors for positive CRM. Conclusions Positive CRM predicted a worse clinical outcome. Poor differentiation, perineural invasion and T3-T4 of pathological stage were higher risk factors for positive CRM in rectal cancer patients after curative surgery.

Cite this article

ZHU Congcong, ZHENG Hongtu, XU Ye . Analysis of risk factors for positive circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer[J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2020 , 25(06) : 498 -502 . DOI: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2020.06.011

References

[1] Park JS, Huh JW, Park YA, et al. A circumferential resection margin of 1 mm is a negative prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 57(8):933-940.
[2] Simillis C, Baird DL, Kontovounisios C, et al. A Syste-matic review to assess resection margin status after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(2):291-299.
[3] Beaufrère A, Guedj N, Maggiori L, et al. Circumferential margin involvement after total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer: are all R1 resections equal?[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017, 19(11):O377-O385.
[4] Lin HH, Lin JK, Lin CC, et al. Circumferential margin plays an independent impact on the outcome of rectal cancer patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision[J]. Am J Surg, 2013, 206(5):771-777.
[5] Nikberg M, Kindler C, Chabok A, et al. Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic marker in the modern multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2015, 58(3):275-282.
[6] Kim KH, Park MJ, Lim JS, et al. Circumferential resection margin positivity after preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on magnetic resonance imaging for locally advanced rectal cancer: implication of boost radiotherapy to the involved mesorectal fascia[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2016, 46(4):316-322.
[7] van Leersum N, Martijnse I, den Dulk M, et al. Diffe-rences in circumferential resection margin involvement af-ter abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection no longer significant[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259(6):1150-1155.
[8] Rickles AS, Dietz DW, Chang GJ, et al. High rate of positive circumferential resection margins following rectal cancer surgery: a call to action[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 262(6):891-898.
[9] Warrier SK, Kong JC, Guerra GR, et al. Risk factors associated with circumferential resection margin positivity in rectal cancer: a binational registry study[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2018, 61(4):433-440.
[10] Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?[J]. Br J Surg, 1982, 69(10):613-616.
[11] Wieder HA, Rosenberg R, Lordick F, et al. Rectal cancer: MR imaging before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for prediction of tumor-free circumfe-rential resection margins and long-term survival[J]. Radio-logy, 2007, 243(3):744-751.
[12] Leonard D, Penninckx F, Fieuws S, et al. Factors predic-ting the quality of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2010, 252(6):982-988.
[13] Mois E, Graur F, Hajjar N, et al. The influence of circumferential resection margins on survival following rectal cancer surgery[J]. Ann Ital Chir, 2017, 88:S0003469X 16026300.
[14] Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, et al. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision[J]. Lancet, 1986, 2(8514):996-999.
[15] Zhang G, Cai YZ, Xu GH. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2006, 59(8):789-799.
[16] 秦雷, 汪亚男, 梁啸寒. ADC值在直肠癌T、N分期及环周切缘中的价值分析[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2019, 40(18):2245-2247.
[17] 冯超, 卢方明, 李晓军, 等. 探讨高分辨MRI对直肠癌术前T、N分期及环周切缘评估的准确性[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2019, 19(68):189-190.
[18] 姜相森, 孙钢, 阴祖栋, 等. 原发直肠癌环周切缘的术前磁共振评估价值[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2019, 29(6):1006-1008,1012.
[19] den Dulk M, Putter H, Collette L, et al. The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(7):1175-1183.
[20] Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for co-lorectal cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 97(11):1638-1645.
[21] Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, et al. Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer[J]. Lancet, 1994, 344(8924):707-711.
[22] 阿地力·克然木, 徐烨. 直肠癌前切除术中切缘的重要性[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2018, 23(5):466-468.
Outlines

/