|
|
|
| Influence Factors of Farmers' Recycling Waste Agricultural Pellicle ——Based on a Survey of 596 Rural Households in Jiangxi Province |
Geng-shou XIA( ), Guo-zhi LI() |
| Business School, Lishui University, Lishui 323000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the questionnaire data of 596 rural households in Jiangxi Province, and using the Logistic model, this paper analyzed the influence factors of farmers' recycling waste agricultural pellicle.The results showed that, 86.91% of households would recycle the waste agricultural pellicle, including 34.90% full recovery and 52.01% partial recovery.Some factors showed significant positive effect on waste agricultural pellicle recycling, for example the age of householder, joining the cooperatives, recovery location nearby, waste management system, policy support, and so on.Some factors showed significant negative effect on waste agricultural pellicle recycling, for example per capita sown area, non-agricultural labor proportion in family, net per capita income, and so on.Some factors showed no significant effect on waste agricultural pellicle recycling, for example sex of householder, culture degree, number of enterprises in village, distance between village and township government, and so on.
|
|
Received: 15 September 2015
Published: 08 March 2016
|
|
|
|
变量代码
Variable code | 变量名称
Variable name | 变量含义及赋值
Variable meaning and assignment | 均值
Average | 标准差
Standard deviation | | Y1 | 废旧农膜是否回收 | 1=“全部回收”; 2=“部分回收”; 3=“全部遗弃” | 1.782 | 0.658 | | X1 | 性别 | 0=“女”; 1=“男” | 0.908 | 0.290 | | X2 | 年龄(岁) | 1=“30岁及以下”; 2=“31~45岁”;
3=“46~60岁”; 4=“60岁以上” | 48.879 | 11.853 | | X3 | 文化程度 | 1=“文盲及半文盲”; 2=“小学”; 3=“初中”;
4=“高中及中专”; 5=“大专及以上” | 3.129 | 1.089 | | X4 | 人均播种面积/亩 | 1=“<1.5”; 2=“1.5~3.5”; 3=“>3.5” | 3.209 | 5.774 | | X5 | 家庭非农劳动力比重/% | 1=“0”; 2=“1~49”; 3=“≥50” | 23.056 | 29.883 | | X6 | 人均纯收入/万元 | 1=“<0.6”; 2=“0.6~1.2”; 3=“>1.2” | 0.786 | 0.528 | | X7 | 是否参加合作社 | 0=“否”; 1=“是” | 0.381 | 0.486 | | X8 | 附近是否有回收地点 | 0=“否”; 1=“是” | 0.419 | 0.494 | | X9 | 村是否有废弃物管理制度 | 0=“否”; 1=“是” | 0.470 | 0.500 | | X10 | 是否有政策支持 | 0=“否”; 1=“是” | 0.579 | 0.494 | | X11 | 村内企业数 | 1=“0”; 2=“1~3”; 3=“>3” | 1.822 | 5.716 | | X12 | 村离乡镇政府距离/km | 1=“<3”; 2=“3~7”; 3=“>7” | 5.337 | 6.810 |
|
|
Variable and assignment
|
| 项目Item | ? | 标准误
Standard | Wald值
Wald value | | 性别 | 0.105 | 0.182 | 1.122 | | 年龄(岁) | 0.033* | 0.293 | 0.422 | | 文化程度 | 0.061 | 0.110 | 0.684 | | 人均播种面积/亩 | -0.092** | 0.301 | 1.238 | | 家庭非农劳动力比重/% | -0.106* | 0.230 | 0.889 | | 人均纯收入/万元 | -0.142** | 0.206 | 1.380 | | 是否参加合作社 | 0.051* | 0.311 | 5.196 | | 附近是否有回收地点 | 0.128** | 0.174 | 0.822 | | 村是否有废弃物管理制度 | 0.081* | 0.181 | 1.339 | | 是否有政策支持 | 0.133* | 0.223 | 1.292 | | 村内企业数 | -0.057 | 0.168 | 0.822 | | 村离乡镇政府距离/km | 0.022 | 0.288 | 0.520 | | R2 | | 0.204 | | | 对数似然值 | | -233.22 | |
|
|
Model regression result
|
| [1] |
李鹏, 杨志海, 张俊飚.资源性农业废弃物循环利用绩效的区域差异问题研究—以农户基质化为例[J].经济地理, 2013(3):150-155.
|
| [2] |
何可, 张俊飚, 田云.农业废弃物资源化生态补偿支付意愿的影响因素及其差异性分析[J].资源科学, 2013(3):627-637.
|
| [3] |
张旭吟, 王瑞梅, 吴天真.农户固体废弃物随意排放行为的影响因素分析[J].农村经济, 2014(10):95-99.
|
| [4] |
韦佳培, 李树明, 邓正华.农户对资源性农业废弃物经济价值的认知及支付意愿研究[J].生态经济, 2014(6):125-129.
|
| [5] |
蒋磊, 张俊飚, 何可.基于农户兼业视角的农业废弃物资源循环利用意愿及其影响因素比较[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2014(10):1432-1439.
|
| [6] |
周大纲. 我国农膜行业现状的分析及其发展对策[J].中国塑料, 2010(8):9-12.
|
| [7] |
冯海. 甘肃省农膜利用现状和存在问题及解决途径[J].黑龙江农业科学, 2012(11):152-154.
|
| [8] |
李鹏, 张俊飚, 丁玉梅, 等.农业生产废弃物循环利用的产业联动绩效及影响因素的实证研究[J].中国农村经济, 2012(11):69-78.
|
| [9] |
童霞, 高申荣, 吴林海.农户对农药残留的认知与农药施用行为研究[J].农业经济问题, 2014(1):79-87.
|
| [10] |
王舒娟, 张兵.农户出售秸秆决策行为研究[J].农业经济问题, 2012(6):90-97.
|
| No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|
2016, Vol. 34 
