Please wait a minute...
空天防御  2025, Vol. 8 Issue (4): 68-77    
0
  战略与体系研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于改进AHP-CRITIC-TOPSIS的空中目标威胁评估模型
顾晨星, 权冀川, 黄志雄, 刘贵宾
陆军工程大学 指挥控制工程学院,江苏 南京 210007
Aerial Target Threat Assessment Model Based on Improved AHP-CRITIC-TOPSIS
GU Chenxing, QUAN Jichuan, HUANG Zhixiong, LIU Guibin
Command and Control Engineering Institute,Army University of Engineering, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, China
全文: PDF(1264 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对空中目标威胁评估中单独使用一类或某种方法存在一定局限性的问题,本文提出一种基于改进AHP-CRITIC-TOPSIS的空中目标威胁评估方法。首先,采用基于层次分析(AHP)权重分析的线性加权法对静态威胁进行计算。其次,使用聚类AHP方法和客观权重赋权(CRITIC)方法对空中目标的动态威胁开展主客观权重分析;利用线性加权和逼近理想解排序(TOPSIS)方法对动态威胁进行计算,得到空中目标威胁值;将空中目标威胁划分为5个等级,分析各等级威胁的紧急程度和防空作战抗击需求。最后,通过案例分析进一步验证该评估模型可行性。验证结果表明,改进AHP-CRITIC-TOPSIS的空中目标威胁评估模型可综合考虑目标主观、客观威胁属性,从更多维度综合反映目标威胁评估结果。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 区域防空空中目标威胁评估模型层次分析法(AHP)客观权重赋权(CRITIC)逼近理想解排序(TOPSIS)    
Abstract:There are limitations when using a single approach to assess the aerial target threat. This paper introduced an improved AHP-CRITIC-TOPSIS method for assessing aerial target threats. Initially, a linear weighting approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to determine the static threats. Subsequently, a combination method was utilised to perform a dual analysis of subjective and objective weights for dynamic threats, which combined the clustered AHP and the objective process of Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC).After that, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method was applied to calculate the dynamic threats. Besides, the aerial target threats were categorised into five levels, which were analysed from the perspective of urgency and the corresponding air defence combat requirements. Finally, acase study was conducted to validate the feasibility of the above assessment model. The results showed that the model could integrate both subjective and objective threat characteristics, giving more comprehensive assessment results across multiple dimensions.
Key wordsarea air defence    aerial target threat assessment model    analytic hierarchy process (AHP)    criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation (CRITIC)    technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)
收稿日期: 2025-05-22      出版日期: 2025-09-09
ZTFLH:  V 557  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目(72471240)
作者简介: 顾晨星(1993—),男,硕士研究生。
引用本文:   
顾晨星, 权冀川, 黄志雄, 刘贵宾. 基于改进AHP-CRITIC-TOPSIS的空中目标威胁评估模型[J]. 空天防御, 2025, 8(4): 68-77.
GU Chenxing, QUAN Jichuan, HUANG Zhixiong, LIU Guibin. Aerial Target Threat Assessment Model Based on Improved AHP-CRITIC-TOPSIS. Air & Space Defense, 2025, 8(4): 68-77.
链接本文:  
https://www.qk.sjtu.edu.cn/ktfy/CN/      或      https://www.qk.sjtu.edu.cn/ktfy/CN/Y2025/V8/I4/68

参考文献
[1] 吴凯, 徐利, 孙海涛. 防空作战火力资源优化分配研究[J]. 空天防御, 2019, 2(2): 5-8.
沪ICP备15013849号-1
版权所有 © 2017《空天防御》编辑部
主管单位:中国航天科技集团有限公司 主办单位:上海机电工程研究所 上海交通大学出版社有限公司