Highlights
1 Introduction
Fig. 1 Heat dissipation of human body and main PTM methods. a Heat transfer mechanism of human body. b Categories of PTM strategies for thermal comfort [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2013, Elsevier. Copyright 2021, American Association for the Advancement of Science. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. Copyright 2013, Elsevier. Copyright 2008, Springer Nature. Copyright 2015, Elsevier. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society |
Table 1 Comparison of different technologies for PTM |
| PTM technology | Active/passive | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air cooling garment | Active | Light weight and low energy consumption | Low capacity and challenges in being embodied into clothing |
| Liquid cooling garment | Active | Large heat capacity | Heavy, bulky fluid circulation systems |
| Ventilation clothing | Active | Enhanced evaporation | Bulky fluid circulation systems |
| Thermoelectrical devices | Active | Good flexibility, high reliability, no vibrating part, and direct energy conversion | Low efficiency in a wide temperature range and rising problems in phase segregation |
| Phase change materials | Passive | Large latent heat capacity | Inconvenient pretreatment, low thermal conductivity, and insufficient sweat removal |
| Shape memory alloys | Passive | Flexible shape transformation | Challenges in being embodied into clothing |
| Evaporation cooling | Passive | Huge latent heat capacity and environment friendliness | Over-cooling and less breathability |
| Radiative cooling/heating | Passive | High thermal regulation performance, cost-effective for energy saving, and flexible regulation | Weather dependence and limited wearable comfort |
2 Radiation Heat Transfer Models and Regulation Principles
2.1 Heat Transfer Models of Human Body
Fig. 2 Schematic of the radiation heat transfer model for PRTM. a The skin and the cloth are considered as two separate control volumes. b The skin and the cloth are considered as a single unified control volume |
Fig. 3 Fundamentals of radiative emissivity from a surface. a Spectral distribution of blackbody and real surface emission. b Directional distribution of blackbody and real surface emission [65]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2019, AIP Publishing. c A surface of doped polyethylene foil that contains SiC and SiO2 nanoparticles on the aluminum. d Reflectance as a function of wavelength and angle of incidence for doped polyethylene foil on aluminum [66]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society |
Fig. 4 Illustration of the heat dissipation and thermal radiation spectrum of the human body. a Human body thermal radiation spectrum (solid dark line) calculated using the blackbody radiation law at a skin temperature of 34 °C. The AM 1.5G solar irradiance spectrum is shown as blue shading and the AM 1.5 atmospheric transmission spectrum in the IR region (4.2-26 μm) is shown as yellow shading [69]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. b The percentage of radiation, vaporization, and convection of human body heat losses as a function of environment temperature [12,24]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2021, Elsevier |
2.2 Regulation Principle of Radiative Heat Transfer
Fig. 5 Schematic of the regulation principle of personal radiative thermal management |
Table 2 Regulation principles and material/structure design strategies for PRTM |
| Functionality | Design principle | Material/structure design strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Radiative cooling | ||
| IR transparent | Ideally, $ \tau_{\mathrm{c}}=1 \text { for IR radiation } $ | Chemical bond stretching or bending vibration away from 7 to 14 μm, such as PE, PP, Nylon 6, PTFE, and PVDF. Smaller pore size for Rayleigh scattering of IR radiation |
| Solar reflective | Ideally,$ \rho_{\mathrm{c}}=1 \text { for solar radiation }$ | Micro/nanoparticles with high refractive index, such as ceramic or inorganic nanoparticles, like TiO2, SiO2, and Al2O3 |
| Improved IR emissive | Ideally,$ \varepsilon_{\mathrm{c}}=1 \text { for } \mathrm{IR} \text { radiation }$ | Metamaterials and multilayered nanophotonic structures with high emissivity at ATSW (8-13 μm) |
| Radiative heating | ||
| IR reflective | Ideally,$ \rho_{\mathrm{c}}=1 \text { for IR radiation }$ | Inclusion of metal-based materials with high IR reflectance, such as metal nanowires, metal nanoparticles, and metal composite, like as AgNWs, Ag NPs, and Cu-Ni NWs |
| Reduced IR emissive | Ideally,$ \varepsilon_{\mathrm{c}}=0 \text { for IR radiation }$ | Nanophotonic structures coupled with metallic fibers with low IR emissivity, like nanoporous Ag and steel yarns |
| UV-VIS-NIR and FIR heating | Photothermal conversion for solar radiation absorption | Inclusion of high solar radiation absorptive materials, like CNTs, and dielectric layer, like Ge and ZrC |
| Dynamic mode | ||
| Bilayer emitter | Combination of different emissive materials. High emissive layer faces outside and low emissive layer faces inside for cooling, and otherwise for heating | |
| Bionic materials | Composite materials with self-tunable thermoregulatory properties inspired by the structures of natural creatures, like chameleons and cephalopods | |
| Smart responsive materials | Inclusion of smart self-adaptive fibers that are responsive to environment temperature and humidity to change the yarn width or pore size | |
2.3 Evaluation of Personal Radiative Heat Transfer
Fig. 6 Evaluation methods for radiative heat transfer. a Schematic of the thermal performance measurement set-up of a simulated skin [51]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH Gmb. b Photograph of the outdoor experimental set-up enclosed by a thermal insulation foam and covered with a layer of aluminum foil and low-density polyethylene [75]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2022, Elsevier. c Digital pictures and illustration of the self-made, light-transmitting device [74]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2019 Wiley-VCH Gmb. d Thermal imaging and photographs (insets) of the human body wearing garments made from radiative heating textile and traditional textile for comparison [76] |
3 Advanced Textile Materials for Radiative Cooling
3.1 IR Transparent Textile Materials
Fig. 7 Representative IR transparent materials related to PE. a Schematics of comparison between nanoPE, normal PE, and cotton [71]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science. b A schematic diagram of the manufacturing process for the nanoPE microfiber. c A photograph of a large woven nanoPE fabric. Scale bar, 0.35 m. d Infrared images of the nanoPE fabric, nanoPE film, Tyvek, and cotton on simulated human skin [80]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2018, Springer Nature. e Photographs of colored knitted textiles and infrared images of bare skin and human skin covered with cotton for blue PB-PE, red Fe2O3-PE, and yellow Si-PE [81]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. f Radiative cooling ability of composite textile composed of a multilayered periodic array of parallel cotton and nylon fibers [83]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. g IR is transparent through bilayer anisotropic wettability nanoPE (BAW-nanoPE) without perspiration, and sweat can be drained in perspiration. h Water transportation mechanism scheme of fabricated BAW-nanoPE [85]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society |
3.2 Solar Reflective Textile Materials
Fig. 8 Representative solar reflective materials. a Schematic representation and SEM micrographs of the proposed mechanism of NIR reflection of P25 TiO2-cotton, TiO2-cotton, SiO2-cotton, and Janus-cotton [99]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2017, Elsevier. b SEM image of the top surface for Al2O3-cellulose acetate coated on Mitsubishi cellulose acetate textile showing the Al2O3 NPs embedded in cellulose acetate of modified textile [69]. c Infrared images of a Mitsubishi T-shirt (top), and a modified Mitsubishi T-shirt (bottom) on a clear summer day in Shanghai, China [69]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. d Schematic illustration of the bioinspired flexible hybrid films. Ceramic particles are embedded in the PDMS matrix filled by compact arrays of micropyramids [100]. e Schematic of the ZnO nanoparticle-embedded nanoporous PE textile, designed for radiative outdoor cooling by reflecting sunlight and transmitting human body thermal radiation [51]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH Gmb |
3.3 Improved IR Emissive Textile Materials
Fig. 9 Designs of metafabric material, nature-inspired multilayer nanophotonic structures, and bionic structures for radiative cooling. a Schematic of a metafabric for daytime radiative cooling. The blue, green, and red dashed boxes highlight the three-level hierarchical structure responding to the UV, VIS-NIR, and MIR bands, respectively. The insets show the calculated scattering fields of 300- and 550-nm light by a 500-nm PTFE particle and a 400-nm TiO2 particle, respectively. Scale bar, 400 nm. E, the electric field of the incident light; k, the wave vector of the incident light. b Calculated scattering and absorption efficiencies for particles with different sizes encapsulated in the metafabric. PTFE particles, TiO2 particles, and PLA fibers demonstrate strong scattering and absorption of UV light, VIS-NIR light, and MIR light, respectively. c Schematic of the metafabric cooling tests on the human body. d Temperature tracking for skin under different fabrics in direct sunlight in Guangzhou, China. e Infrared images of the volunteer under direct sunlight in Sipsongpanna, China [18]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2021, American Association for the Advancement of Science f Microstructure of the PA/PVDF/PE composite textile [107]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. g A schematic diagram of thermoregulatory effect discovered in the Saharan silver ant, Cataglyphis bombycina. h The pattern of designed PDMS-SiO2-Ag with a triangular prism array of a size parameter at 8 μm inspired by the Saharan silver ant [111]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2020, Elsevier |
4 Advanced Textile Materials for Radiative Heating
4.1 IR Reflective Textile Materials
Fig. 10 Metal-based IR reflective materials. a Schematic of nanowire cloth with thermal radiation insulation and active heating, and the corresponding thermal images and regular photographs of normal cloth, CNT-cloth, and AgNW-cloth [114]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society. b SEM images and thermal images of the CTIM and Ag NPs/CTIM [116]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. c Schematic of multifunctional cotton-based cloth modified with a superhydrophobic silica nanoparticle/PDMS layer on one side and coated with a nanoporous cellulose acetate layer followed by depositing a thin silver film on the side. Also, it showed the SEM image and infrared photograph [112]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. d Schematic of WKF/Cu-Ni/rGO/PDMS composite [117]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society |
4.2 Reduced IR Emissive Textile Materials
Fig. 11 a Schematics depicting the heat dissipation and vapor transmission of the human body covered with traditional textile and nanophotonic structure heating textile composed of an IR transparent layer and an IR reflective layer with embedded nanopores in both layers to simultaneously achieve minimal IR emissivity and good breathability. b Photographs and SEM images of the Ag side and PE side of nano-Ag/PE. Scale bar, 1 µm. c Thermal imaging and photographs (insets) of the human body wearing garments made from radiative heating cotton/Ag/PE textile and traditional textile, respectively [76]. d Schematic of the heat dissipation of the human body with multi-material aerogel fabric. e Digital photograph of commercial cotton mask integrated with a piece of multi-material aerogel fabric by weaving (orange dashed box). The colored points are the positions of the thermocouples. f Real-time temperature difference ∆T between multi-material aerogel fabric, mask, and bare skin [120]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2022, Springer Nature |
4.3 UV-VIS-NIR and FIR Radiative Heating Textile Materials
4.3.1 UV-VIS-NIR Radiative Heating
Fig. 12 UV-VIS-NIR radiative heating materials. a Laminated structure of the biomimetic membrane. b Comparison of the temperature for the laminated membrane, cotton cloth, bare skin, polyester cloth, CNT/cellulose membrane, cellulose/Ag membrane, and reversed laminated membrane (condition: the thickness of all samples is about 0.5 mm). c Thermal images of the biomimetic membrane supplied with a voltage of 3.7 V [127]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. d Schematic illustration of novel functionalities of cotton fabric after coating with NM/PDMS. e Surface temperature change of cotton samples over 3 cycles of NIR irradiations [128]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2022, Elsevier. f Schematics depicting the heating mechanism of the colored textile with simultaneous solar and passive heating abilities. qnet denotes the net heat flux from the textile into the skin. g Optical and thermal images of a toy sheep partly wearing a colored textile with simultaneous solar and passive heating abilities [129]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2019, Elsevier |
4.3.2 FIR Radiative Heating
5 Dynamic Textiles for Dual-Mode of Radiative Cooling and Heating
5.1 Dual-Mode Textile Composed of a Bilayer Emitter
Fig. 13 Schematic of working principle, composition structure, and thermal regulation performance of dual-mode textile. a Comparison of traditional textiles and dual-mode textiles. b Layered structure of the dual-mode textile. c Real-time thermal measurements of dual-mode and traditional textiles under varying ambient temperatures [137]. d Working principle and the structural component of the Janus textile designed by Luo et al. [139]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. e Schematic illustration of the working principle of the Janus film fabricated by Dai et al. [140]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society |
5.2 Biomimetic Material Inspired by Natural Animals
Fig. 14 Bioinspired design of thermoregulatory composite materials. a-c Schematic of radiation regulation for a space blanket on a human arm, the squid skin, and the composite material on a human arm in a wearable (sleeve) configuration. d Infrared camera images of a forearm covered with a space blanket-based sleeve and a composite-based sleeve under strain varying from 0 to 50% [150]. e Penguins-inspired dual-temperature-regulation materials. f Schemes of light absorption, reflection, IR transparency, and air convection of PAN, PAN/BT, and PAN/BC nanofibers. g-h Temperature variation of simulative skin when PAN/CB and PAN/BT nanofibers were used as heating or cooling materials with content variation of CB/NPs and BT/NPs under the radiation of a solar simulator for 30 min [151]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2019, Elsevier |
5.3 Dynamic Responsive Change of Fiber/Yarn Structure
Fig. 15 Dynamic responsive materials for dual-mode thermal regulation. a Illustration of the working principle and fabrication process of thermal insulation and thermoregulation textiles [20]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. b Structural illustration of a thermally actuating dual-mode thermal management device. The nano-Cr black Al plate serves as the solar collector for solar heating. The functional layer for radiative cooling in the RC tape is composed of a DOP-modified PMP matrix and TiO2 NPs fillers. A narrow strip of VHB tape, used as the sole joint part between solar heating and radiative cooling layers, preserves the maximum effective area for dual-mode thermal management. The inset of SEM image shows that nano-chromium oxide powders are uniformly distributed on the aluminum plate. c, d Optical images of the dual-mode device in heating and cooling modes [155]. e Design principles of the IR gating textiles. Each yarn knitted into the textile is composed of multiple metafibers that contain IR-active nanostructures. f Confocal fluorescent microscopy images showing the knitted fabric in the closed state (left) (low humidity) and the open state (E) (high humidity). To illustrate the side-by-side bimorph structure of the fibers, the hydrophilic cellulose component was dyed with an aqueous solution of rhodamine B (red), and the hydrophobic triacetate component was dyed using coumarin 6 (green) from a mixed organic solvent. g The IR transmittance change over the atmospheric transmission window (8-14 μm) of IR gating metatextile (black line) with different relative humidity profiles [72]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2019, American Association for the Advancement of Science |
6 Conclusions and Outlook
Fig. 16 Schematic summary of conclusions and outlook for PRTM |
Table 3 Summary of materials, fabrications, thermal regulation results, advantages, and limitations of different radiative cooling materials |
| References | Structures/materials | Fabrication methods | Optical properties and thermal regulation results | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR transparent textile materials | |||||
| Hsu et al. [71] | NanoPE | Microneedle punching, point wielding, and lamination | Average IR transmittance of 96% and 77.80% for PDA-nanoPE-mesh. Lower the simulated skin temperature up to 2.7 ℃ for nanoPE and 2.0 ℃ for PDA-nanoPE-mesh | Sufficient air permeability, water-wicking rate, and mechanical strength for wearability | Uncomfortable to wear due to its plastic-like nature |
| Peng et al. [80] | Uniform and continuous nanoPE microfiber | NanoPE microfiber was extruded with paraffin oil and knitted/woven into fabric | Average IR transmittance over 70%. Lower the simulated human skin temperature by 2.3 ℃ | Excellent water-wicking rate, wearability, and durability | N/A |
| Cai et al. [81] | PE | Nanoparticle-mixed PE composites were extruded and knitted into textiles | Average IR transmittance of 80%. Lower the simulated skin temperature by 1.6-1.8 ℃ | Colored textile, good water-wicking ability, mechanical strength, and excellent stability against washing | N/A |
| Solar reflective textile materials | |||||
| Wong et al. [98] | TiO2-coated cotton | Calcination treatments | Solar reflectance of 84.80%. Lower the surface temperature by 3.9 ℃ | Excellent air permeability and washability | Complicated fabrication |
| Panwar et al. [99] | TiO2-SiO2 Janus-coated cotton | Pickering emulsion method and exhaustion method | NIR reflectance of 79%. Lower the surface temperature by about 3 ℃ than uncoated cotton | Easily applied to a flexible textile substrate | Complicated fabrication |
| Solar reflective and IR emissive textile materials | |||||
| Wei et al. [69] | Al2O3-CA-coated textile | Dip-coated onto textiles or Mayer rod-coated on PET substrate | Solar reflectance of 80.1% and IR emissivity of 97%. Lower the simulated skin temperature of 2.3-8 ℃ and avoided the overheating of actual human skin by 0.6-1.0 ℃ | Scalable, low cost | Slow fabrication process, poor wearability, and dyeability |
| Zhang et al. [100] | PDMS encapsulating Al2O3 | Microstamping method | Solar reflectance of about 95% and IR emissivity over 96%. Lower the temperature up to 5 ℃ | Great flexibility and superior strength | Poor air permeability and wearable discomfort due to its film nature |
| Wang et al. [74] | PVDF/TEOS with SiO2 on the surface | Electrospinning and emulsion deposition | Solar reflectance of about 97% and average IR emissivity over 96%. Lower the temperature up to 6 ℃ | Scalable, low cost, great flexibility, and superior strength | Poor air permeability and wearable discomfort due to its film nature |
| Solar reflective and IR transparent textile materials | |||||
| Cai et al. [51] | ZnO NPs embedded into nanoPE | Melt-pressed into a thin film | IR transparency of 80% and solar reflectance over 90%. Enable the simulated skin to avoid overheating by 5-13 ℃ | Scalable | Surface hydrophobicity and poor moisture-wicking |
| Improving IR emissive textile materials | |||||
| Zeng et al. [18] | TiO2-PLA metafiber with PTFE laminated on the top layer | Metafiber was extruded, melt spinning and drafting, and weaved into textile, finally laminated with PTFE | Average IR emissivity of 94.5% and solar reflectance of 92.4%. Lower the surface temperature over 3 ℃ than cotton | Superior tensile properties and mechanical strength, waterproofness with air permeability, durability, and washing resistance | N/A |
| Song et al. [107] | PA/PVDF/PE | Electrospinning | IR emissivity of about 90% and solar reflectance of 90.22%. Lower the body temperature by 6.5 ℃ | Scalable, lightweight, high wearable comfort, and economical | N/A |
| Song et al. [108] | Porous PE and PEO | Melt mixing, melt spinning, cold drawing, and weaving | IR emissivity of 90.97% and solar reflectance of 93.77%. Avoided the human body overheating by 6.8 ℃ | Scalable, superlight, flexible, moisture-permeable, waterproof, excellent tensile strength, and UV protection | N/A |
| Gu et al. [109] | CF@Zn-Al LDHs/CF@ZNR | Hydrothermal method, vacuum filtration, and magnetron sputtering | Maximum IR emissivity of 98% and IR transmittance of 83.0% | Antibacterial, ultraviolet resistant, good flexibility, and breathability | Complicated fabrication |
| Jeong et al. [111] | PDMS, SiO2, and Ag | Photo-lithography, sputtering, spin coating | Average emissivity of 98% and solar reflectance of 95%. Cooling by 6.2 ℃ below the temperature of ambient air | Gradient refractive index effect | Complicated fabrication, and wearable discomfort |
Table 4 Summary of materials, fabrication, thermoregulation performance, advantages, and limitations of different radiative heating systems |
| References | Structures/materials | Fabrication methods | Results | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR reflective textile materials | |||||
| Hsu et al. [114] | AgNWs embedded cotton cloth | Dip-coating method | Single-layer AgNW network with simulated IR reflectance of 95%. Provide 21% more thermal insulation | Vapor permeable, excellent thermal insulation, durability, and capable of Joule heating | High cost and metal oxidation |
| Yu et al. [115] | AgNWs and PDA-coated cotton | Dip-coating method | Average MIR to FIR reflectance of 86%. Allowed Joule heating to increase from 22 to 40 °C in 1 min | Durability, washability | Poor substrate adhesion |
| Yue et al. [116] | Ag NPs/cellulose fibers | Silver mirror reaction | Maximum IR reflectance over 50%. A decreased temperature of 1.9-2.3 °C for IR images due to reflected radiation | Good breathability and excellent antibacterial ability | Wearable discomfort due to its membrane nature |
| Liu et al. [112] | PDMS-SiO2/CA-coated Ag | Coating method | Average transmittance close to 0%. A decreased temperature of 1.3-1.6 °C for IR images due to reflected radiation | Good breathability, waterproofness, antibacterial ability, and capable of Joule heating | Metal oxidation |
| Hazarika et al. [117] | WKF coated by Cu-Ni NWs and rGO | Hydrothermal method | Average IR reflectance over 98%. Cu3Ni1-WKF/PDMS provided 43% more thermal insulation than bare WKF/PDMS | Sufficient breathability and high durability | Sensitivity to moisture and oxygen |
| Hazarika et al. [119] | WKF/Ag@MoxFe1−xSe/MXene/PDMS | Hydrothermal method and spin coating | MIR reflectance of 97.4% and UV-VIS-NIR absorptivity of 87.10% | High tensile strength, high self-powered heating efficiency, good breathability, and high durability | Complicated fabrication |
| Reducing IR emissive textile materials | |||||
| Cai et al. [76] | nanoPE and nanoporous Ag-coated cotton | Electroless plating metallic film onto nanoPE and laminated with cotton | IR reflectance of 98.5%, inhibited thermal emissivity of 10.1%. Enabled a 7.1 °C reduction of the set-point | Lightweight, good breathablity, high durablity, good washability, and good colorability | N/A |
| Wu et al. [120] | Aerogel composite fabric coated with an Ag layer | Continuous coaxial wet spinning process | IR emissivity of 22.2-45.6%, improve the human body temperature of 5.7 °C (thickness of 1.29 mm) | Lightweight, self-cleaning, good breathability, high mechanical and thermal stability | Metal oxidation |
| UV-VIS-NIR radiative heating textile materials | |||||
| Yue et al. [127] | Porous Ag/cellulose/CNT laminated nanofiber membrane | CNT foam finishing process and magnetron sputtering | Average human body IR reflectance of 76% for the Ag layer, solar absorptivity over 90% for the CNT layer. The simulated skin temperature was 5.1 °C higher than that of cotton covered | Possess high porosity, hydrophilicity, breathability, flexibility, and mechanical stability | N/A |
| Luo et al. [129] | Au and Ge deposited onto PDA-coated nanoPE textile | Vacuum magnetic sputtering | Solar absorption of about 50% and low IR emissivity of about 10%. Higher temperatures of 3.8 °C /6.4 °C than a black sweatshirt | Excellent aesthetics, wearability, manufacturability, and easy manufacturability | Discomfort wearability |
| Xu et al. [130] | ZrC coated on polyester fabric | Magnetron sputtering | FIR emissivity of 93.79%. An increased temperature by 27.5 °C in 100 s | High photothermal conversion efficiency | Discomfort wearability |
| FIR radiative heating textile materials | |||||
| Hu et al. [134] | Graphene and polyurethane deposited onto cotton | Pad-dry-cure process | FIR emissivity up to 91.10% | Excellent ultraviolet blocking, electrical conductivity, and stability against laundering | N/A |
| Qiu et al. [135] | PET-carbon nanofiber-inorganic NPs | Electrospinning process, carbonization, and lamination | Increasing temperature to 43 °C from room temperature in 1 min with electrothermal conversion efficiency up to 78.99% | High dispersing efficiency, air permeability, and heating stability | Complicated fabrication process and restricted flexibility |
Table 5 Summary of materials, fabrication, thermoregulation performance, advantages, and limitations of dynamic different radiative materials |
| References | Structures/materials | Fabrication methods | Results | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hsu et al. [137] | Bilayer emitter of carbon and Cu embedded in nanoPE | Doctor blade coating, magnetron sputtering, and stacking | Expand the thermal comfort zone by 6.5 °C | Dual-mode, good air permeability, water-wicking rate, and mechanical strength | Complicated fabrication process |
| Yue et al. [138] | Cu/MnO2/cellulose@LDH membrane | Vacuum filtration technology | Average low emissivity of 43.60% for the Cu layer and high emissivity of 97.30% for the cellulose@LDH layer | Good breathability and flexibility, interfacial compatibility, and antibacterial activity | Metal oxidation and discomfort wearability |
| Luo et al. [139] | PMMA/ePTFE/Al/nanoPE/ZnNPs/CuNPs | High-vacuum magnetic sputtering and spraying coating | Increased/decreased of 8.1/6 °C on heating/cooling mode | Electricity generation | Complicated fabrication |
| Leung et al. [150] | IR transparent polymer matrix (styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene) and IR reflecting structure (Cu) | Electron-beam deposition, spin-casting, and delamination | Dynamic environmental set-point temperature window of about 8 °C | Scalable, stretchable, flexible, good reversibility, tuneability, and stability | Poor air permeability |
| Ye et al. [151] | PAN/BT NPs for cooling and PAN/CB NPs for heating | Electrospinning method | Cooling: solar reflectivity of 89.59% and MIR transmission > 95.16%, decrease 2.5 °C; Heating: solar absorptivity of 93.5% and MIR transmission < 50%, increase 8.7 °C | Flexible, self-powered, washability, and superior electoral output performance | |
| Wu et al. [20] | Phase-change microstructured fibers (PCMFs) coating with PDMS | Freeze-spinning method | IR emissivity of 0.059-0.231, MIR emissivity of 0.149 at 9.5 μm for one-layer textile, slow heating and cooling rates than polyester | Good water hydrophobicity, high mechanical robustness, and high working stability | Restricted phase change temperature |
| Zhang et al. [155] | Nano-Cr black Al plate for heating/DOP-modified PMP matrix and TiO2 NPs fillers in RC tape for cooling | multiple blade coating, esterification reactions | Cooling: Solar reflectance of > 90% and MIR absorptivity/emissivity of ~ 96%, average heating power of ~ 859.8 W m−2; Heating: Solar absorptivity of ~ 91%, average cooling power of ~ 126.0 W m−2 | Intelligently auto-switched, zero-energy, scalable, and cost-effective | Weather resistance |
| Zhang et al. [72] | CNTs on the triacetate cellulose fibers | 3D laser direct-write lithography printing | Modulate the IR radiation over 35% | Dyed, washable, and reversible gating effect | Costly fabrication |
Table 6 Advantages and limitations of commonly used clothing fibers |
| Type | Fiber | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural fiber | Cotton | Soft, breathable, warm, and moisture-absorbent | Easy to wrinkle (poor elasticity and stiffness), deform and shrink |
| Linen | Cool and non-sticky feel when sweating; Natural luster, good color fastness, UV protection, and anti-mildew | Rough to feel, easy to wrinkle and shrink, and poor wearab comfort compared with cotton | |
| Silk | Soft and smooth, good luster and moisture absorption, and skin nourishing | Poor color fastness, bacterial and insect resistance. Easy to perish (rot) and generate static electricity | |
| Wool | Good elasticity, warmth, and moisture absorption, and antistatic property | Poor shape retention, bacterial and insect resistance. Easy to pill, shrink, and turn yellow | |
| Synthetic fiber | Polyester | High strength and wearability. Good mildew, bacterial, wrinkle, and light resistance | Poor moisture absorption and air permeability, easy to pill, difficult to dye |
| Nylon (Polyamide) | Good resilience and durability, light weight. Good mildew, bacterial, and solar radiation resistance | Poor moisture absorption, easy to wrinkle, poor heat and light resistance | |
| Acrylic (Polyacrylonitrile) | Good elasticity, high strength, and high warmth | Poor moisture absorption and wearability. Poor heat and alkali resistance | |
| Polypropylene | Light weight, good warmth, moisture absorption, and elasticity | Poor light and high-temperature resistance, easy to age | |
| Spandex (Polyurethane) | High elasticity and good shape retention | Poor moisture absorption, easy to break |

