海洋工程装备设计技术

深水钻井平台三种移位方式对比分析

展开
  • 中海油田服务股份有限公司,河北 三河065201
董铁军(1983—),男,学士,工程师,主要从事钻完井工程和海洋工程方面的研究。

收稿日期: 2017-09-20

  修回日期: 2017-12-20

  网络出版日期: 2018-08-08

Comparative Analysis on Three Move Methods of Deepwater Drilling Platform

Expand
  • China Oilfield Services Limited, Sanhe, Hebei 065201, China

Received date: 2017-09-20

  Revised date: 2017-12-20

  Online published: 2018-08-08

摘要

深水钻井平台移位主要有使用自身推进器自航、由拖轮拖带(纯拖)、由拖轮拖带且同时使用推进器协助(混拖)三种方式。以海洋石油981为例,就该平台的自航、纯拖及混拖三种移位工况,就三种移位方式存在的风险隐患及经济效率分别进行分析。分析结果表明,自航移位方式经济性最好,混拖次之;混拖所需移位时间最短,自航和纯拖所需时间基本相同。

本文引用格式

董铁军, 项凯, 周新保 . 深水钻井平台三种移位方式对比分析[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018 , 5(3) : 208 -213 . DOI: 10.12087/oeet.2095-7297.2018.03.11

Abstract

Deepwater semi-submersible drilling units normally move between well locations by sailing using self-propulsion, towing by tug boat, or combination of self-propulsion and towing. Comparison and analysis of these three approaches are carried out in the aspects of risk tolerance and economic efficiency using HYSY981 as an example. The results show that: self-propulsion is the most economical way of the three, combination towing is the second, but the combination towing could save a lot of time, and the time of moving the platform by self-propulsion and that by towing are almost the same to each other.

参考文献

1 中国海洋石油总公司.海洋石油981平台操船手册[M].北京: 中国海洋石油总公司,2015. China National Offshore Oil Corporation. HYSY981 operating manual [M]. Beijing: China National Offshore Oil Corporation, 2015. 2 中国船级社.海上拖航指南[S]. 2011. China Classification Society. Guidelines for towage at sea [S]. 2011.
文章导航

/