Review article

Review on the state-of-the-art and challenges in the MgB2 component manufacturing for superconducting applications

  • Fabiano Carvalho de Castro Sene
Expand
  • Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, United States

Received date: 2023-10-05

  Revised date: 2023-12-04

  Accepted date: 2023-12-13

  Online published: 2023-12-16

Abstract

Since the discovery of MgB2 as a superconductor, several research groups worldwide have studied the superconducting mechanisms due to the dual gap nature of MgB2, as well as attempted to produce such a compound in wires, tapes, bulks, and thin films for a plethora of applications. While MgB2 carries the promise of replacing Niobium-based superconductors in low-field applications, less-than-desirable performance and in-operation stability has slowed down such a progress. While the properties and nature of the superconductivity of MgB2 are fairly known, the reproduction of its properties at manufacturing scales remains an unsolved problem. Therefore, this manuscript presents a systematic review on fundamental properties, phase formation, growth kinetics, and superconducting properties of MgB2-based components such as multi- and mono-core wires, bulks, and thin films. Advances, challenges, and shortcomings are utilized in consolidating research questions and directions pertaining to the manufacturing of MgB2 superconducting devices. Lastly, we evaluate the technological readiness of MgB2-based devices for applications in fusion energy systems.

Cite this article

Fabiano Carvalho de Castro Sene . Review on the state-of-the-art and challenges in the MgB2 component manufacturing for superconducting applications[J]. Superconductivity, 2024 , 9(0) : 100083 . DOI: 10.1016/j.supcon.2023.100083

1. Introduction

Magnesium Diboride (MgB2) [1] (See Fig. 1) was discovered as a phonon-mediated [2] superconductor in 2001 by Nagamatsu [3] and promptly sparked interest due to its transition temperature $\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{c}}=39 \mathrm{~K}$. Superconducting components based on MgB2 have been primarily produced as bulks, tapes, wires, and films to suit different applications in energy, electronics, medical, and particle physics applications [4], [5], [6], [7]. Among those modalities, some of the predominant techniques for MgB2 wire and tape production are Powder-in-Tube (PIT) [8] and Mg Infiltration [9]. Unlike REBCO superconductors, the polycrystalline nature of MgB2 per se does not limit its superconducting or mechanical performance [10]. Rather, phenomena related to the growth of MgO, MgB4, amongst other non-superconducting phases generally culminates in the reduction of connectivity between MgB2 grains, causing rapid decay of the magnetic field in response to increasing critical current densities ($J_C$) [11].
Fig. 1. MgB2 (a) lattice and (b) charge density. Materials Project Platform [12]. Data retrieved from the Materials Project for MgB2 (mp-763) from database version v2022.10.28. This information was extracted directly from [13] without modifications. This content is licensed under the CC-BY-4.0 DEED (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/..
In this manuscript, the state-of-the-art manufacturing and challenges associated with superconducting MgB2 tapes, wires, and bulks for a multitude of applications are explained. By pinpointing milestones in MgB2 superconductor performance achieved so far, it serves as baseline to define next steps concerning manufacturing process needs and performance reproducibility. The proposed roadmap outlines the Process-Structure-Property-Performance (PSPP) needs, where potential links between process dynamics and intrinsic material properties are leveraged towards elaborating on MgB2 performance for each superconductor modality.

2. Deposition processes for MgB2 thin films

MgB2-based thin films exhibit promise for future superconducting electronic device applications. Compared to the 2–3 nm coherence length in YBCO [14], MgB2 presents a 4–6 nm and rises as a candidate to compose Josephson Junctions [15]. Deposition of MgB2 thin films via Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE) [16], [17], as well as Pulsed Laser Deposition (PLD) [18] has been reported, where the latter process has mostly yielded low-quality, amorphous phases of MgB2 rather than epitaxial, crystalline MgB2 films. Among those, Hybrid Physical-Chemical Vapor Deposition (HPCVD) is regarded as a more stable process for growth of MgB2 thin films compared to other techniques, according to reports in [19], [20]. However, observed circular defect sites in MgB2 films grown via HPCVD point to the Mg phase transformation as a key factor for originating such sites and thinning MgB2 films in their vicinities [21]. While the thermodynamic behavior of Mg poses a challenge to the MgB2 film epitaxial growth, the substrate choice may also impact the process thin film growth; hence leading to the deposition of low crystallinity layers. To unveil challenges in deposition of MgB2 films, authors in [22] exhibited a systematic analysis of MgB2 thin film morphologies, where the relationship between MgB2 grain size, surface roughness, and deposition rates was built. Growth parameters have significantly impacted the film quality grown on SiC, MgO, and stainless-steel substrates. As expected, the growth of MgB2 thin films grown via HPCVD obeys the Volmer-Weber modes [23], where small grain colonies are formed, then coalesce through a thermally activated mass diffusion process. Tight deposition control of HPCVD has enabled epitaxial, highly crystalline thin films as reported in [24] and [25]. $\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{c}} 42 \mathrm{~K}$ and $\mathrm{J}_{\mathrm{c}} 1 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{~A} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}$ in self-field at $\mathrm{T}=1.8 \mathrm{~K}$ have been achieved as results of the property reproducibility of such thin films [23]. A process-agnostic CALPHAD model proposed by [26] studies the dependencies of the MgB2 superconducting phase films with pressure, temperature, composition of precursors. Those ultimately led to MgB2 phase diagrams for a multitude of process conditions, shedding light to the expected behavior of Mg and B precursors in forming MgB2 and posterior growth in the thin film form.
Along with high $J_C$, a $T_C$ above the theoretical 39K first demonstrated in 2001 [5], [27], [28] demonstrated MgB2 film smooth surfaces are suitable for applications in Josephson Junctions. Authors in [29], [30] presented a Hot Electron Bolometer (HEB) produced via HPCVD with MgB2 thin films for precision Infrared radiation (IR) measurements. In [31], authors characterized submicron MgB2 films grown on SiC, where the 10 nm and 40 nm MgB2 films achieved $\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{C}} 35 \mathrm{~K}$ and $\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{C}} 41 \mathrm{~K}$, respectively. The 20nm films exhibited the highest $\mathrm{J}_{\mathrm{c}} 1.2 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{~A} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}$ under self-field conditions at 4.2K. This evidenced the dominant flux pinning mechanism (i.e., surface or volume pinning) according to the film thickness, culminating in potential increases of both $T_C$ and $J_C$. Investigations in [32] employed optical spectroscopy to analyze optical properties of an HPCVD-grown 1000-nm MgB2 film on Al2O3 substrate, for which $T_C$40K. Authors reported the film electron–phonon density function, optical scattering rate and conductivity at T=8K and T=50K. Optical information of such thin films was utilized in generating data to support the development of multigap devices based on superconductors such as MgB2. In [33], 50 mm-diameter MgB2 films were fabricated on an Nb substrate via HPCVD and tested as superconducting radiofrequency cavities. The produced MgB2 film achieved good performance as demonstrated by TC39.6K and surface resistance of 120 μΩ at 4K. Characterization of multiple thicknesses of MgB2 thin films (i.e., 20 nm, 200 nm, 600 nm, and 1μ m) produced via HPCVD was done in [34] for analysis of surface morphology of films grown on SiC. Film growth according to the Volmer-Weber Mode was reported and accounted for the high RMS film roughness. In this process, the measured film critical thickness remained between 60–100 nm, after which the deposited MgB2 islands would coalesce to form the film. Dominance of the surface pinning mechanism was observed for 60 nm and 200 nm films and, for thicker films with a-b growth, stronger flux pinning mechanism via volume pinning was reported.
Authors in [35] investigated the possibility to produce MgB2 in three-dimensional structures via HPCVD on Al2O3 cylindrical substrates. The 10 μm film exhibited $T_C$39K, and $J_C$105A/cm2 in self-field. Reduction of $J_C$ is linked to inhomogeneity of films caused by non-epitaxial growth, Volmer-Weber modes, and high deposition rates. Besides, film properties were majorly affected by the inability to control the Mg vapor pressure in the HPCVD reactor. Such a factor culminated in decreasing the in-situ reaction rate of MgB2 from Mg vapor and B2H6. As a result, deposits of both unreacted Boron and Magnesium were found on the Al2O3 substrate. The work presented in [36] built upon [35] concerning HPCVD of MgB2 films on stainless steel cylinders, where authors presented a model to predict the feasibility of MgB2 films in shielding magnetic fields with effectiveness of 65 dB.In such a case, the reported $T_C$37.5K with $J_C$7.6×106A/cm2 at 10 K, and 4.6×106A/cm2 at 20 K both in self-field. MgB2 thin films were grown on Al2O3 with ZnO layers via HPCVD [37]. Different buffer layer thicknesses (i.e., 0, 9 nm, 15 nm, 23 nm, and 40 nm), were shown to improve $J_C$. ZnO layers diffused with MgB2 throughout HPCVD, originating flux pinning centers in grain boundaries and point defects; hence improving $J_C$. Anisotropy analysis in off-axis MgB2 [0 0 1] c-axis thin films on MgO [2 1 1] substrates via HPCVD perpendicular planes was reported in [38]. Through a Van der Pauw configuration, resistivity ratio values at both 40 K and 200 K were obtained with linear four-probe, refined, and simplified circuit models for a 40 nm thick MgB2 layer. In [39], authors demonstrated thin films of MgB2 on C-terminated 6H-SiC present better grain connectivity compared to Si-terminated in HPCVD. The study utilized low B2H6 gas flow rate (1-2sccm), high H2 flow (400 sccm) and maintained pressure of 40 Torr. The oxidation of surface Si atoms and posterior polishing removed Si, then Si-C bilayer on top. The thicker film (10.7 nm) grown on Si presented $T_C$ of 37.8 K as opposed to the 36.4 K on C-terminated substrate. The reported 1 nm RMS roughness of the film on the C-terminated substrate was significantly lower than the 2.4 nm measured for the MgB2 film on Si. Electrical resistivity at 42 K is 7 μΩ.cm for the MgB2 thicker film on C-terminated substrate, and 17 μΩ.cm for the film on Si-terminated SiC. Authors in [40] built upon [39], and demonstrated the growth of a 2 nm MgB2 film on C-terminated SiC substrate via HPCVD. A Molybdenum susceptor held Mg pellets heated to 730 °C, and the thickness calibration of MgB2 films exhibited a deposition rate of 0.16 nm/s. For the 2 nm MgB2 superconducting film, authors reported $T_C$27.2K, and $J_C$=2×107A/cm2 at 3 K in self-field, and RMS roughness of 0.62 nm. Also, the growth of a MgO layer prior to the MgB2 film deposition caused the substrate surface to become smoother, allowing for a smaller RMS roughness of the film.

2.1. Challenges in HPCVD of MgB2 thin films

HPCVD has allowed deposition of high-crystallinity MgB2 films with relatively low surface roughness. However, applications of MgB2 in superconducting circuits such as Josephson Junctions (JJs), transistors, and photodetectors still require further understanding on the compatibility between substrates and MgB2 to mitigate issues related to grain growth orientation, as well as the compound phase control (See Fig. 2). Harnessing phenomena such as the Volmer-Weber Modes by reducing the island critical height, RMS roughness < 0.5 nm, and engineering point defects for improvements in $T_C$ and $J_C$ are paramount to improving magnetic and electrical transport in such films. As for the target material (i.e., Mg), the ingot purity may also introduce other elements that cause an unbalance in the in-situ reaction between Mg vapor and B2H6 (i.e., borane) precursor. In this case, the inability to control such reactor conditions may cause premature deposition of unreacted B and Mg. While the challenges presented are formidable, the literature has shown the ability to grow 2 nm films, the thinnest achieved to date.
Fig. 2. Workflow for manufacturing of homogeneous, reproducible MgB2 films.

2.2. Challenges at the HPCVD reactor level

While epitaxial growth via HPCVD has been reported by several authors, tighter control of the deposition rate may enable a higher degree of reproducibility of engineered flux pinning mechanisms in electronic devices and magnetic shields. Defining specific milestones concerning the reproducibility of the HPCVD for MgB2 thin films and further production scalability requires addressing the constructive issues at the HPCVD reactor level as defined.
(i) Deposition rates in orders of magnitude higher than a few nm/s represent the challenge for centimeter-long MgB2 superconducting tapes, which is also limited by the HPCVD reactor atmosphere, mixing of the precursor gases, and substrate compatibility.
(ii) Separating heating mechanisms in the susceptor and Mg ingots also poses a significant challenge. Most of the proposed HPCVD reactor designs comprise either resistive or induction heating components.
(iii) Glass-based HPCVD reactor walls require thermal treatment for operation at temperatures > 730 °C during long hours while remaining mechanically stable.
(iv) Production scalability demands the incorporation of reel-to-reel substrate mechanisms to the reactor interior, which remains unachieved due to the low pressure required by the HPCVD process.
(v) Deposition of multi-layer structures requires in-situ control of the film surface characteristics and stability (See Table 1.).
Table 1. Deposition Parameters for HPCVD.
Constructive Aspects - Reactor Deposition Parameters Composite Structure Properties Performance Metrics
Dimensions Target Material Film Stoichiometry Yield Strength
Susceptor Geometry and Material Substrate Temperature Film Thickness Fracture Toughness
Heating Mechanism Chamber Temperature Film Roughness Scattering Rate
Susceptor Material Gas/Vacuum Pressure Critical Current Density
Reactor Wall Material Gas Flow Rate Substrate-Film Compatibility Critical Temperature
Corrosion Resistance % of Precursor Gas Critical Magnetic Fields
Thermal Load Target-Substrate Distance
Substrate Thickness Film Crystallinity
Mechanical Load Compound Vapor Pressure

3. MgB2 wires

Mono and multifilamentary wires have been under development since the discovery of MgB2 as a superconductor. Research groups and private companies based out of Europe [41], United States [42], [43], and Asia [44], [45] have engaged in the pursuit of optimizing MgB2 wires to make it economically viable for applications ranging from 4.2-20 K. Most roadblocks to long-length MgB2 wire manufacturing concern the mechanical and superconducting property reproducibility. Techniques such as Internal Magnesium Diffusion (IMD) [46] (See Fig. 3), Reactive Liquid Diffusion (RLI) [47], Powder-in-Tube (PIT) [48], and Continuous Tube Fill Forming (CTFF) [49] have been applied to producing kilometer-scale MgB2 wires for low-field applications and power transmission. However, the synthesis, %wt. of the MgB2 phase, contamination, low grain consolidation and orientation control have become ubiquitous challenges in MgB2 mono or multifilamentary wires.
Fig. 3. Internal Magnesium Diffusion of MgB2 wires. Reprinted with permission from [50]. Copyright (2021) American Chemical Society.
The literature has presented a plethora of studies concerning the property stability of MgB2 wires for applications in poloidal coils of fusion reactors [51], low-field coils for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) [52], [53], [54], development of test coils for low-field magnets up to 3 T [55], [56], power transmission cables [57] and power generation [58], as well as launching systems for civil aircraft [59]. For low-field applications (i.e., <5T), MRI and poloidal coils for fusion reactors are candidate applications for operation at 4.2-20 K. To illustrate the roadmap to wire practical applications, authors in [60] defined the six phases that a material must go through from the discovery of the superconductor to the magnet-grade production (See Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. Roadmap from discovery to production at scale of superconductors.
Due to the brittleness of MgB2, wire manufacturing is usually performed based on composite structures (i.e., metal matrices – MC) to provide the strain resistance that the sintered MgB2 by itself does not have. Early in the manufacturing research of MgB2 wires, Seven-filament MgB2 wires were proposed by [61] in a process of mechanical deformation and post-annealing heat treatment. Compared to the mono-core wires produced via Powder-in-Tube, the Fe-sheathed wires caused the $J_C$ to be around four times larger than observed in mono-core wires. Although promising, outcomes of a four-month degradation test results showed the annealed wire would no longer superconduct without prior sintering. While the sintered cable exhibited $I_C$ =50.7A in self-field, the PIT (See Fig. 5) mono-core cable would still present a post-degradation $I_C$ 62.8A at 4.2 K in self-field. The presumed reason for the post-degradation performance decrease in the seven-filament, annealed wires is the Mg oxidation that limits the MgB2 core density. Reduction of the %wt. superconducting phase in wires is the compromising agent of their $J_C$.
Fig. 5. Powder-in-Tube of in-situ MgB2. This image was extracted from [62] and placed here without modifications. The content is licensed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/..
Through the Rietveld method, [58] performed full spectra neutron scattering studies with ex-situ, Ni-sheathed MgB2Ni2.5 wires. The MgB2 lattice strain due to the wire deformation pointed to a decrease in the wire $T_C$. Mg deficiency in the starting powder was pointed out. Using neutron diffraction and SEM imaging, MgB2 larger crystallite sizes showed to be inversely correlated with the wire critical temperature. Tapes analyzed under 1 T and 4 T magnetic fields exhibited their highest $J_C$ when reacted at 900° and 920 °C, respectively. Ni migration into the tape during the sintering process was determined to limit the current density of the tapes. In a study presented by [63], texture characterization of Ti-MgB2 wires produced via PIT reported that the MgB2 $[10 \overline{1} 0]$ phase, found in mono-core wires, disappeared after the rolling process for production of multifilamentary wires. Such findings evidenced the MgB2 content may also be impacted by the wire drawing process. In [64], authors reported Reactive Liquid Infiltration (RLI) to produce mono and seven-filament, MgB2 wires on Nb sheath enclosed by soft steel (SS). The hollow wire geometry is caused by the melting of an Mg rod and posterior infiltration, followed by the in-situ reaction with the Boron powder to form an MgB2 phase on top of the internal surface of the Nb sheath to yield the MgB2 mono-core wire (See Fig. 6). The reported superconducting area of the monofilamentary wire is ten times smaller than the seven-filamentary topology, determined to estimate the wire $I_C$. RLI monofilamentary wires tested at up to 10 T and 4.2–30 K exhibited $J_C$10×103A/mm2 at 4.2 K-1 T.
Fig. 6. Reactive Liquid Infiltration (RLI) process for MgB2 mono-core wire production.
The applicability of MgB2 superconducting coils for space applications in [65] points to the weight factor, where MgB2 filaments enclosed by either thin or thick walls represents a lighter option than BSCCO. $J_C$ exhibited inverse correlation with wire strain at 4.2 K. The Fe-sheathed annealed-bent wire exhibited a $J_C$ that is four times lower than the bent-annealed wire at a radius of 1 cm. However, constructive factors of MgB2-based coils such as structural support and thermal expansion coefficients may detract from the MgB2 wire superconducting performance. In [66], authors presented MgB2 wires produced via RLI that yielded a 0.28 wire fill factor. Volume shrinkage of up to 25 % was reported, hence ascribed as a cause of low property homogeneity in tubular MgB2 wires. Carbon-doped MgB2 wires presented lower electrical resistance than the undoped form at B=0-4.5T. Nonetheless, tubular wires opened the precedent for cryogenic cooling with liquid Ne at temperatures around 27 K. The carbon-doped modality of MgB2 wires produced via RLI exhibited an $B_{C_{2}}$ of 5 T, congruent with the findings for the undoped modality, but at 26 K [47]. In that case, the C-dopant at a 6 % of B weight was enveloped by an Nb barrier. Addition of SiC and carbon nanoparticles culminated in higher $B_{C_{2}}$ induced by the C-substitution in MgB2 sites.
To reduce chances of Cu migration into the MgB2 cores, various metal matrices such as Fe and Nb barriers for in-situ wires were reported in [67], where a technique named Continuous Tube Forming & Filling (CTFF) combined with PIT yielded monofilamentary MgB2/Fe and MgB2/Nb/Cu/SS. For both wire topologies, in-situ reaction of MgB2 with an added 8 % of SiC yielded improvements in the $B_{C_{2}}$ and $J_C$ of the wire at 4.2 K. The estimated $J_C$106A/cm2 in self-field and high n-factor hinted about potential the use of CTFF + PIT to produce MgB2-based coils for operation in persistent mode. Authors in [49] performed CTFF of MgB2/Nb/Cu/Fe wires with seven filaments utilizing 8 % SiC. The SiC-doped, Fe mono-core wires exhibited higher $J_C$ and $B_{C_{2}}$ compared to undoped Fe-monocore and multifilamentary MgB2. SiC- and ethyltoluene-doped MgB2 tapes produced via in-situ PIT exhibited significant $J_C$ improvements from 33-225A/mm2 at 4.2 K under 10 T [68]. With the heat treatment between 600–800 °C, Arc-plasma of MgB2 with ethyl-toluene (C6H9) and 3.7 % SiC additive yielded the highest $J_C$ at both 4.2 K-10 T and 20 K-5 T. In [69], authors analyzed the sintering temperature effects in the ex-situ MgB2 grain morphology. As expected, grain sizes increased with the sintering temperature. Although wires sintered at 1050 °C yielded slightly higher fill factor and grain size than the obtained at 950 °C, MgB2-950 °C presented overall best superconducting performance with $J_C$3×105A/cm2 at 2 T.
Motivated by the challenges in IMD, CTFF and PIT for MgB2 wire production, [70] presented a novel multi-stage manufacturing process for MgB2 multifilamentary cables. The approach addresses the MgB2 production from the in-process purification of precursor powders. Nanosized Boron powder is mixed with Mg and Cu then deposited on a U-shaped composite SS-Cu sheath. Unlike PIT and IMD, this method encompasses laser welding of the sheath containing the in-situ powder. While the process comprised a sintering step, no details on the technology or process temperature were reported. In a subsequent work, authors in [71] addressed the in-situ MgB2 mono-core wire production with 10 % SiC on Monel/Titanium sheath through the same process demonstrated by [70]. The 0.75 mm-diameter samples sintered at 700 °C for 10 and 30 minutes, respectively, at 1 T, exhibited $I_C$ below 200 A.
Building upon [70], [71], authors in [72] compared the $J_C$ of SiC-added, in-situ MgB2 wires sintered in (i) batches and (ii) in line. S2 (in-line continuous sintering) yielded wires with comparable $I_C$ (i.e., between 140A-180A) in self-field with S1 (direct insertion in pre-heated furnace) wires at comparable sintering times below 40 minutes. S3 (batch sintered) wires yielded $I_C$ 170A in self-field, but sintering the whole batch took 20 h to yield comparable properties with S1 and S2-sintered wires. Besides, the in-situ reaction dynamics of Mg + B + SiC requires further study for this process. The SiC as a dopant may trigger the growth of non-superconducting phases such as MgSi, B-C amongst other byproducts which may culminate in the reduction of %wt. MgB2/wire length; hence deteriorating the wire superconducting performance. Mechanical milling of Mg with coronene and nano-sized Boron powders yielded a 0.5 mm-diameter, mono-core MgB2 wire with $J_C$103A/mm2 under 10–20 K and 6.1–3.3 T conditions [73]. The Boron nano-powder reacted with Mg and C24H12 in-situ to form the superconducting phase doped with carbon. Heat treatment under 600 °C-3 h yielded a high packing ratio, caused by the reduced porosity in the in-situ process due to the addition of coronene. The addition of a carbon source triggered the Boron substitution in MgB2 sites, which contributed to the creation of pinning centers; therefore, improving the wire $J_C$.
In [74], authors presented an electromechanical assessment of in-situ PIT of a 10-filament MgB2 wire produced with Coronene dopant. Wire necking was reported at 4.2 K, B = 0 T and ∊ 0.4-0.45%, but no apparent signs of wear were seen at 10 T. Tests at 300 K, 77 K, and 4.2 K exhibited the wire critical tensile strain increases with the temperature reduction. Between 7–10 T, $I_C$ decreased exponentially from around 350 A to 50 A. Such values remain some of the best found in the literature for in-situ PIT MgB2 wires. However, the application of PIT MgB2 wires in transmission lines requires further testing on $I_C$ stability under strain and temperature variation. Indentation tests performed in Dai et al., 2017 [75] using a 36-filament, in-situ PIT-produced MgB2 wires yielded an inverse correlation between indentation depth and $I_C$ in self-field. Under fields of 2–7 T at 4.2 K, an indentation depth of 0.12 mm yielded the maximum $I_C$ values. Comparison of $I_C$ in self-field measured in Bi-2212, Nb3Sn, and NbTi cables of similar diameter evidenced the MgB2 wire as the most sensitive to increases in the indentation depth. The impact of heat treatment conditions in MgB2 multifilamentary wires was exhibited in [76]. The wires manufactured by Hypertech Inc and WST were cut to 135 cm pieces for $I_C$ measurement under magnetic fields between 1–6 T. Heat treatment for the WST wire, composed by 53μ m-thick filaments, took 4 h compared to the 2 h needed by the Hypertech wire with 38μ m-thick filaments. The heat treatment yielded a decrease of less than 5 % in $I_C$ for both wire topologies. Nevertheless, further study is required to understand how both wires perform under strain and what role degradation plays in the decrease of $I_C$ over time.
Supporting computational work for $I_C$ prediction in multi-strand MgB2 superconducting wires was reported in [77]. Wires of 0.36 mm diameter from nine batches were utilized, for which IC100A at 25 K. The model encompassed the E-J power law to predict $J_C$ as a function of temperature targeting current improvement for use of MgB2 in Superconducting Fault Current Limiters (SFCLs). Studies on the thermal conductivity of MMC-MgB2 wires in MRIs were carried out in [78] where a finite element approach was taken to elucidate the thermodynamic compatibility between the MgB2 core, Nb and copper barriers, as well as the Monel matrix. Thermal conductivities, Poisson Ratio, and Elasticity Modulus of each component measured between 10–300 K showed the need for understanding composite structure properties prior to magnet design such that failure mechanisms (i.e., quenching) are avoided.
Modeling of MgB2 coils for application in SMES was presented in [79], where React and Wind (i.e., R&W) and Wind and React (i.e., W&R) coils produced by Hypertech Inc and Columbus superconductors served as testbeds. Strain analysis and distribution exhibited a direct relationship of strand deterioration with the $I_C$ decrease and quenching for 30 kJ of energy storage in the coils under liquid hydrogen cooling. A relevant study was then proposed in [80] where a 2D electromagnetic model was developed to find optimum filament positioning for reduction of AC losses in MgB2 multifilamentary wires. The optimum ordering was exhibited for a 13+0f wire, where filaments are positioned near the outer surface of the metal matrix. In that case, the magnetic flux density mapping indicates low intensity of $B$ in the wire core, culminating in a linear increase of AC losses rather than a piecewise linear-exponential curve shown in the 6+6+1f and 7+6f wires.
Further experimental validation on such a modality of electromagnetic studies may support development of novel MgB2 wire topologies with improved performance and enhanced quenching protection. A combined approach of $I_C$ prediction and magnet finite element analysis would help understand the role of material compatibility (i.e., thermal conductivities, heat expansion, stress and strains) in the operation of MgB2 magnets.

3.1. Challenges at the MgB2 wire production process level

The previous section provided a comprehensive analysis on the MgB2 wire production from the Process-Structure-Property-Performance perspective. Production conditions in multiple processes pointed out which aspects carry relevance in the performance improvement for MgB2 wires for low-field applications. MgB2 is not yet an economically viable choice compared to Nb3Sn and NbTi due to the maturity associated to the available manufacturing technology. Based on the analysis proposed in this section, Table 2 brings out constructive aspects, process parameters, structural properties of interest, and performance factors for MgB2-based wires. Besides, several items outlining the needs and directions for advancement of wire MgB2 wire production are highlighted below. While the MgB2 phase consolidation is affected by the process constructive aspects, powder purity, modality (i.e., ex- and in-situ) and dopants, the process physics and wire design are the primary drivers of the wire performance. Some highlights of such challenges are comprised in the list below.
Table 2. Relevant conditions and parameters in MgB2 wire production process.
Constructive Aspects - MgB2 Wire Processing PIT/RLI/CTFF/IMD/W&R/R&W Parameters Composite Structure Properties Performance Metrics
Deformation Mechanism (Tubular envelope, rolled metal sheet) Powder Modality Wire Thickness Critical Current Density
MgB2 Reaction Mechanism and Dopants Powder Dopant Crystallographic Data Critical Temperature
Process Atmosphere
Powder envelope Drawing Process Uniaxial Load %wt. MgB2/Length Critical Magnetic Fields
Wire/Tape Drawing Mechanism Sintering Temperature %wt. Byproducts/Length
Environment Inertness Wire Length Deformation Rate Fill factor
Wire Length Wire Sintering Time Grain Orientation
Powder Purity Thermal Expansion of Sheath Bending Radius
Sheath Material Process Time
Heating Rates Filament Number Residual stress Critical Strain at Multiple Temperatures
Sintering Mechanism Microstructural Properties
(i) Powder purification and choice of precursors for in-situ MgB2 grain formation.
(ii) Wire drawing mechanisms that preserve MgB2 phases in multifilamentary wires.
(iii) Control of process atmosphere and in-situ measurement of wire property homogeneity (e.g., %wt. MgB2 and other crystallographic information).
(iv) Understanding of in-situ MgB2 reaction in the presence of dopants such as SiC, which may create several byproducts and compromise MgB2 grain connectivity.
(v) Combined Multiphysics modeling and ex-situ characterization results of MgB2 mono and multifilamentary wires to map out the long-term effects of indentation, optimum filament positioning, material compatibility, and thermodynamic properties in the superconducting regime of coils.
(vi) Engineering of MgB2 lattice defects utilizing carbon-based and other dopants for increase in the $J_C$ and $B_{C2}$ of MgB2 mono and multifilamentary wires.
(vii) Characterization and superconducting performance evaluation of equivalent MgB2-based systems produced via PIT, RLI, R&W, W&R, and IMD to pinpoint advantages and shortcomings of each from the same level.

4. MgB2 bulks

Processes for MgB2 powder consolidation have been largely explored over the years. Research initiatives explored grain growth, microstructure properties, and influence of dopants in bulks’ superconducting and mechanical properties for application in superconducting joints and magnetic levitation devices. Across the techniques employed, Hot Pressing (HP) [81], Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) [82], and Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) [83], [84] remain as effective methods to achieving high-quality bulks for superconducting applications of MgB2. Despite such efforts, a plethora of process-related challenges constrains aspects that affect the control of MgB2 bulk properties (i.e., mechanical, and superconducting), consequently slowing down any progress toward increasing their Technology Readiness Level (TRL).
Initially, [85] reported MgB2 bulks produced at 720 °C using ball-milled Magnesium Hydride (MgH2) and powder B as precursors. For this case, the SPS processing temperature was kept below 897 °C to prevent the MgB2 decomposition, and consequent creation of higher borides (i.e., MgB4), and amorphous Mg. Yielded MgB2 bulks presented a temperature onset of 37.3 K. Subsequently, [86] proved the relationship between pressure and temperature with the pinning mechanisms and levitation force in MgB2 superconducting bulks. Additions of SiC, C, and Ti have been shown to improve the flux trapping performance, yielding improvements in $J_C$. Although MgB2 exhibited only 2.5 %wt. compared with higher borides such as MgB7 and MgB12 for bulks processed under 2 GPa, a $T_C$37.6K remained relatively close to the theoretical value of 39 K. Bulks processed via SPS caused the boron and oxygen colonies to increase the flux pinning forces if compared to point or grain boundary pinning centers. In-situ hot-pressed MgB2 bulks with added SiC at 1050 °C-2GPa showed the highest pinning force density (i.e.,$ \mathrm{F}_{\mathrm{P}}=10.9 \times 10^{9} \mathrm{~N} / \mathrm{m}^{3}$) amongst all samples. In a similar approach to [86], authors in [87] investigated the SPS of in-situ, SiC-added MgB2 bulks with high Mg deficit on ratios B/Mg between 3.75–1.87. The sample with highest deficit of Mg (S1) presented the $\mathrm{T}_{\mathrm{C}} 36.6 \mathrm{~K}, \mathrm{~B}_{\mathrm{C}_{2}}=36.37 \mathrm{~T}$, and the highest $J_C$106A/cm2 in self-field amongst all S1-S3 samples. Besides, the absence of Mg2Si hinted about the unreacted amount of SiC in the sample. In [88], authors presented nearly 100 % dense MgB2 bulks processed via HP-SPS under 1.7-5GPa. This approach exhibited reduced %wt. of non-superconducting phases and controlled MgB2 grain orientation that allows for the control of supercurrents. To illustrate both intra and inter-grain supercurrents, Fig. 7 shows the dynamics of both micro and macro $J_C$ based upon the work reported in [89].
Fig. 7. Influence of sintering temperature in the behavior of micro and macro $J_C$ under presence of external magnetic fields. This image was extracted from [89] and placed here without modifications. This content is licensed under the CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
In another attempt to improve superconducting properties of MgB2 bulks, [90] presented $J_C$ improvement in MgB2 bulks by adding Boron Nitride (BN) at 1, 3, and 5 %wt. In multiple cases, BN as a dopant caused the shrinkage of the MgB2 lattice parameter a, while slightly stretching c. The samples ‘b’ with pure MgB2 and ‘c’ with MgB2(h-BN)0.005 exhibited the highest $F_P$ values at both 5–20 K. Overall, the addition of h-BN in ex-situ MgB2 sample did not yield significant changes in either the $F_P$ or $J_C$. Conversely, c-BN in sample ‘f’ (i.e., MgB2(c-BN)0.005) and ‘g’ (i.e., MgB2(c-BN)0.01) exhibited good improvement of FP to values between 4.77-5.37×109N/m3, and yielding similar $J_C$ behavior for both samples at 5–20 K. Authors in [91], presented SiC-doped MgB2 samples processed in-situ, via one- and two-step SPS at 850 °C. Pure MgB2 bulks exhibited $T_C$37.8K, being highest than the others reported. The molten Mg in the in-situ reaction Mg + 2B bulks with 10 %wt. SiC was shown to weaken the Si-C bonds, incorporating C into the MgB2 lattice, and causing Mg to eventually react with Si to form Mg2Si. The impact of such in-situ reactions in the superconductivity of MgB2 bulks was also studied by [86], [87].
Further, [92] reported that spark plasma sintered GeO2-added MgB2 bulks germanium-based dopants in MgB2 bulks were reported by exhibited improved $B_{C2}$ as a result of the creation of pinning centers similar to the carbon effect in SiC added MgB2 samples. The addition of GeO2 increased flux pinning in grain boundaries, as shown in samples MgB2(GeO2)0.005 and MgB2(GeO2)0.01 samples that yielded comparable $J_C$ to the pure bulk, but stood out with the highest $B_{C2}$ between 8.2–7.5 T at $J_C$=103A/cm2. However, for such a work, pure MgB2 samples yielded the $J_C$106A/cm2 in self-field at 5 K, the highest across all bulks. The addition of both germanium and carbon-based sources for flux pinning center creation was done by [93], where Ge2C6H10O7-added, ex-situ SPS MgB2 bulks exhibited $J_C$102A/cm2 at 5.8 T for the MgB2(Ge2C6H10O7)0.0014 form. Such a precursor for Ge and C caused the $T_C$ onset of the bulk to decrease from 38 K to values as low as 33.4 K, which can be ascribed to the sharp reduction of MgB2 %wt. in the bulk. Interestingly, compared to the doped samples, the pure MgB2 bulk yielded the poorest $B_{C2}$ performance at temperatures between 5–20 K.
Ex-situ SPS of MgB2 bulks doped with c-BN and C60 was reported in [94]. Fullerene served as a primary C source in the MgB2 bulks, where a 92.7 % relative density, 10.3 %wt. MgB4, and the highest residual strain amongst all samples equaling σ=0.88% were reported. Tests for the pure MgB2 bulk exhibited a $J_C$0.9×106A/cm2 in self-field, the highest amongst all samples. Pristine MgB2 and carbon-added bulks showed similar performances for $J_C$ at 0–3 T and 5 K, but the pure sample exhibited a sharp $J_C$ decay past 4 T. At 20 K, MgB2 and (MgB2)0.95(C)0.05 bulks have similar $J_C$ in up to 2 T. The rate of decay for the MgB2 past this region is sharper than in the (MgB2)0.95(C)0.05. Such an effect can be ascribed to the C replacement of B in MgB2 sites, creating flux pinning centers that improve the in-field $J_C$. Overall, the concomitant addition of C60 and c-BN in ex-situ MgB2 did not yield significant results concerning flux pinning, similar to the Ge and C added dopants in a previous attempt. In [95], authors obtained 99 % dense, pure MgB2 bulks processed by ex-situ SPS, for which a $T_C$38.5K was reported. MgB2 samples produced under 50 MPa-10-3 bar vacuum pressure, and heated at 1050 °C-1200 °C for 20 min yielded $J_C$2×105A/cm2 in self-field. The measured trapped field equivalent to 1.4 T at 10 K was also reported for the 20 mm diameter sample. Authors in [96] built upon [95] and reported the flux trapping at 10–25 K by the surface and interior of a stacked MgB2 bulk structure.
In [82], authors took an approach to solely characterize the mechanical performance of MgB2 bulks produced via HIP. The 70-mm diameter bulks produced under 98 MPa-1173 K for 3 h yielded bulks with a 92 % packing ratio. On average, the fracture strength of such bulks at 77 K equated to 257 MPa, whereas testing at room temperature indicated an average of 220 MPa. Comparatively, MgB2 bulks yielded higher fracture strength then high-density REBCO bulks produced under similar conditions. Furthermore, with 100 % packing ratio, the predicted fracture strength of the MgB2 bulk is 419 MPa. Furthermore, test results in [97] also indicated that the processing temperature in SPS improves the MgB2 bulk packing ratio, contributing to the increase of both Young Modulus and fracture strength. The three MgB2 bulks were produced via SPS under a 10-3 bar vacuum atmosphere and temperatures 950 °C, 1000 °C, and 1100 °C. [98] analyzed the influence of dwelling time in superconducting properties of MgB2 bulk samples produced via SPS. In it, a variety of ex-situ samples were submitted to periods of 1, 4, 7, 10, and 20 minutes. The bulk ‘20 m’, whose description was ascribed according to its SPS dwelling time, presented 97.1 % relative density: the highest among all bulks. Nevertheless, $J_C$ measured between 10–25 K indicate that samples ‘1 m’ and ‘4 m’ exhibit better properties for 0–8 T altogether. At zero-field and 100 A/cm2, the $B_{C2}$ of ‘1 m’ and ‘4 m’ presented smoother decays over temperature increases. Overall, results highlighted that the dwelling time did not impact either the microstructure or superconducting properties of the bulks in a significant manner.
In [99], authors measured the magnetic levitation force of in-situ MgB2 bulks produced with a surplus range of 5–30 % Mg added to the Mg + 2B mixture. XRD patterns exhibited increases in the Mg content as the %wt. Mg added beyond the ratio Mg:2B. The optimal $T_C$ onset at 38.6 K for the MgB2 + 10 %Mg bulk, whereas the highest repulsive force $F_z$ measured was slightly above 22 N for the MgB2 + 15 %Mg sample. The lateral force $F_x$ also provided insights on how MgB2 bulk properties can be tailored toward utilization in magnetic bearings for electromechanical energy conversion devices such as induction motors. Subsequently, [100] reported studies on the pinning force in MgB2 bulks sintered via SPS and other sintering techniques. The SPS-processed MgB2 bulk presented a $\mathrm{F}_{\mathrm{P}}=300 \times 10^{6} \mathrm{~N} / \mathrm{m}^{3}$, which is more than twice as high as the maximum achieved by the non-SPS sintered samples. A $J_CSPS $ of 300×103A/cm2, flux trapped of 1.45 T at 20 K, and high pinning forces are ascribed to the microstructural control provided by SPS compared to other sintering techniques. [101] reported improvements in $J_C$ and $T_C$ of ex-situ MgB2 bulks with added Y2O3 nanosized powder. Both powders were ball-milled prior to the Field Assisted Sintering Technology (i.e., FAST, namely SPS) step. With all samples sintered at 1150 °C-50 MPa with dwell time of 5 minutes, $J_C$109A/m2 at 4.2 K-3 T for 0.5–2.0 %wt. of Y2O3 has been reported. Such samples were ball-milled for 12 h. At 20 K, the pure MgB2 sample exhibited higher $J_C$ for fields up to 1.5 T, followed by the MgB2 + 0.5 % wt. Y2O3 bulk. The bulk MgB2 with 0.5 %wt. Y2O3 sintered for 12 h exhibited a $J_C$ that is twice as large as for pure MgB2 sample. The increase in the $B_{C2}$ at both 4.2–20 K provided substantial evidence of superconducting property improvement via dispersion of Y2O3 as a mechanism to create artificial pinning centers in MgB2 bulks.
In [102] sintered four ex-situ MgB2 samples between 900–1200 °C to analyze the processing temperature effects over the sample properties. While no significant changes occur in $T_C$ according to the provided estimate, bulks processed at 1000–1200 °C exhibited higher relative densities and higher $J_C$ if compared to the 900 °C-sample at 4.2 K-5 T, 20 K-0 T, and 20 K-3 T. Nevertheless, the 900 °C-processed bulk exhibits a $B_{C2}$=6.5T at 4.2 K, which is slightly above the 6.1 T exhibited by the samples produced at 1000 °C and 1100 °C.

4.1. Challenges and roadmap for scalability of SPS of MgB2 bulks

The manufacturing of MgB2 wires remains constrained by the inability to control microstructural properties at the kilometer scale. An alternative to such a hurdle is the joining process between two or more long-length wires or cables done through bulk joints. Although not the only use for MgB2 bulks, which may, in the future, become a replacement for permanent magnets in low-field applications, the joining of superconducting coils represents a present need for MRI, amongst other low-field-large-magnet devices. While some of the most recent literature on MgB2 joint production has reported the utilization of Hot Pressing (HP) and Internal Magnesium Diffusion (IMD), results have shown that the microstructural property control remains a roadblock. Microfractures and non-superconducting secondary and tertiary phases (i.e., MgB4 and MgO) have limited the bulk joint $J_C$ to 60 % compared to the parent wire. With shortcomings observed in HP, HIP, and IMD, the Spark Plasma Sintering technique (See Fig. 8) has risen as a promising asset to overcome most of the bulk processing challenges, yielding better superconducting and mechanical properties for pure MgB2 bulks.
Fig. 8. Spark Plasma Sintering system diagram. Source: This image was extracted from [103] and placed here without modifications. The content is licensed under the CC BY-NC 3.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/..
From the perspective of superconducting joints for MgB2 wires, [104] reported using sintering techniques for joining utilizing ceramic bonding and processing time between 2–20 h. The microstructure of the joints produced in all scenarios exhibited a brittle aspect for both mono and multifilamentary MgB2 wires, which yielded an onset $T_C$ equivalent to 33.49K and 40 % of the $J_C$ measured in the parent cable. In [105], authors have reported a composite superconducting joint utilizing Internal Magnesium Diffusion (IMD) for single-core Ni/MgB2 wires. Still, the technique employed could only get the joint to achieve 60% of the nominal $J_C$ of the cables. In [106], authors presented a sintering process to join unreacted carbon-doped multifilamentary MgB2 wires, where an $I_C$=30.8A at 20 K-1.5 T and R=3.32×10-14Ω at 20 K in self-field were demonstrated. [46] described another attempt to join single-core MgB2 wires via IMD and a composite enclosure made out of Niobium and Copper, for which a contact R=6.44×10-16Ω and $I_C$ of 62A at 20 K-0 T were achieved. Other spark plasma sintered MgB2 bulks with improved $J_C$ are reported, where [83] considered pure in and ex-situ powders, [107] added Mg in excess to ex-situ MgB2, [108] performed in-situ reaction of Mg:2B with nanosized Boron with Dy2O3 doping. AlB2 addition [109], Mg/hBN [110], Rb2CO3 and Cs2CO [111], and nano-Pt/nano-SiC powders [112] were also shown.
To illustrate the needs in scaling up the production of MgB2 bulks for application as superconducting joints, a five-phase roadmap has been laid out in order to evidence the needed contributions for speeding up SPS-based production of MgB2 bulks. The completion of each phase implies the reporting of every and any activity comprised within it. Fig. 9 exhibits the breakdown of tasks needed for developing high-quality, reproducible joints.
Fig. 9. Phases of the project from the preliminary stage up to framework validation and deployment.
Phase 1: CAD design of the joint is developed considering different geometry complexity levels for the joints. This provides a benchmark for understanding stress levels, creating a bill of materials for the crucible, evaluating crucible-MgB2 compatibility, and elaborating experimental setups for the superconducting joint sintering process.
Phase 2: Machining of multifilamentary MgB2 wires is done to allow for higher adhesion between the joint envelope (i.e., metal alloy-based crucible) while augmenting the contact surface between MgB2 filaments and the Mg+2B amorphous powder.
Phase 3: Spark Plasma Sintering of joints promotes MgB2 grain growth from Mg+2B powder and consolidates the bulk joint within the metal alloy-based crucible. This process comprises high temperature, uniaxial pressure, and electrical current pulses for optimal densification of the bulk and grain orientation.
Phase 4: Microstructural characterization and joint testing comprise (i) surface microstructure via Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), (ii) X-Ray Diffractometry (XRD), (iii) Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) and fracture testing of the joint geometries produced. Furthermore, relative density measurements and Computerized Tomography (CT) must be performed to measure and visualize pores and internal defects.
Phase 5: Obtain stability map of superconducting joint is done according to the results obtained from the tests in Phases 3 and 4. A roadmap for assembling joints of diverse geometries concerning equipment, material, and information preparation for potential large-scale production must be defined.
Critical scientific contributions needed in Phases 1 through 5 relate to: (i) understanding the consolidation mechanism of polycrystalline MgB2 filaments in wires with amorphous Mg+2B powders for the development of superconducting joints; (ii) quantifying defect density per unit volume of consolidated bulk joint; (iii) quantifying effects in $J_C$, $B_{C2}$, and $T_C$ and bulk relative density due to joining pre-produced filaments with Mg+2B bulks; (iv) elaborating stability map for joined multifilamentary wires for characterization and mechanical testing results; (v) quantifying effects of micro-machining wire terminals in mechanical and superconducting properties of joints.
Superconducting bulks rely on process control and material properties in order to yield reproducible properties for targeted applications. Hence, sintering techniques for bulk consolidation must account for the controllable parameters (i.e., process parameter space) as well as the material and the modality of consolidation (i.e., in- or ex-situ) such as shown for SPS of MgB2 bulks in [113]. From the standpoint of Process-Structure-Property-Performance (PSPP) relationships targeting part reproducibility, baseline quantities are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. PSPP metrics for reproducible properties of sintered MgB2 bulks.
Constructive Aspects - SPS Sintering Parameters Composite Structure Properties Performance Metrics
Crucible material and dimensions Powder Modality Bulk Thickness Critical Current Density
Crucible strength Gas/Vacuum Pressure Crystallographic Data
Powder envelope Process Uniaxial Load %wt. MgB2
Rated Power Process Temperature %wt. byproducts (i.e., MgB4, MgB7, MgO, others). Critical Temperature
Maximum Uniaxial Load Displacement Relative Density
Nominal Temperature Voltage Grain Orientation
Powder envelope Electric Current Microstructural properties (pre- and post-irradiation) Critical Magnetic Field
Temperature Measurement Type Vacuum Pressure Repulsive Force
Heating Rates wt.% and particle size of additives/dopants Magnetization
Gas/Vacuum Mechanism Process time Fracture Toughness, Hardness

5. Technology Readiness Levels of MgB2 for fusion energy devices

Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) were defined by NASA [114] in the 1980s as a benchmark for technologies applied to space missions, in which the maturity level of was assessed in a 1-9 scale (See Fig. 10). Since then, such a tool has been utilized in benchmarking technology according to their level of maturity. The TRL of fusion devices involves very specific challenges concerning the plasma stability, fuel fabrication and performance, and waste management as proposed in [115] but leaves superconducting technology aside. As discussed by [45], [51], [116], further development of MgB2 poloidal coils may enable a potential replacement of Nb-based coils with a superconductor at higher temperature. However, the literature on MgB2-based poloidal coils is scarce, with just a few publications since the discovery of its superconductivity. To leverage such challenges related to MgB2 applications in large-scale devices, Fig. 10 provides a TRL map of milestones for superconducting device manufacturing, qualification, and operation.
Fig. 10. Technology Readiness Level based on superconductor manufacturing research and development stages.
MgB2 wire topologies were explored in [117] for implementation in the IGNITOR fusion prototype, a collaboration between Italy and Russia. However, this project has not progressed further than the design stage, having had its last update in 2022 with a field-coil design revision [118]. Studies on the development of MgB2 coils reported in [116] highlight the short-lived radioactivity of MgB2 compared to the induced radioactivity in Nb-based superconductors. In such an effort, a 100-meter wire section was fabricated based on MgB2 with added Cu, which yielded a 2.62 T field. Other studies concerning the effects of cable indentation in the superconducting properties were reported in [75], followed by experimental work on both DC and AC performance in MgB2 Cable-In-Conduit Conductor (CICC) superconducting wires [45], and heat transfer analysis for quench mitigation in multifilamentary MgB2 wires [44].
Additional barriers are yet to be overcome for the MgB2 application in poloidal magnets of fusion systems, whose main requirements for stability and reliability related to withstanding extremely high mechanical stresses and electrical currents [119], [120], [121]. Fusion reactors require superconductors to carry high current densities in order to induce multi-Tesla, steady magnetic fields for plasma confinement for extended periods, while withstanding radiation effects along with a multitude of thermal, magnetic, and mechanical stresses. Currently, Nb3Sn has been utilized in facilities such as ITER [122] and FNSF [123], [124], but the required cryogenic cooling power needed for Nb3Sn superconductors is one of the energy expenditure-based roadblocks faced by current magnetic confinement NFRs. Compared to Nb3Sn-based superconductors currently utilized in experimental reactor facilities, MgB2 is a promising alternative for magnets in nuclear fusion in terms of affordability and manufacturability, $T_C$, $J_C$, and $B_C$.
Methods such as isotopic doping of MgB2 have been assessed, where Mg11 was employed to MgB2 bulks [125]. Such experiments provide an understanding of how MgB2-based joints would operate within a nuclear fusion-relevant environment. While the so-called “Isotope Effect” was proven to interfere in the phonon frequency of the MgB2 lattice and cause improvement in superconducting properties of such a material, further work is required to benchmark such a behavior for MgB2 poloidal coil structures. Notably, superconductivity testing for MgB2 components in fusion-relevant environments still requires work and could hardly be found in the literature. This indicates the infancy of MgB2 applications in fusion-related applications, consequently placing such a technology between TRLs 1-3.

6. Conclusions and discussion

This manuscript presented and described the state-of-the-art manufacturing techniques to produce MgB2-based superconducting components. Four different modalities of MgB2 components were described: thin films, tapes, wires, and bulks. To date, the HPCVD remains a step above other deposition processes of MgB2 thin films due to yielding low RMS surface roughness. Nanofilms of MgB2 produced via such a technique exhibit better properties at comparable scales. Nevertheless, applications of MgB2-based Josephson Junctions still require addressing issues such as superconductivity of in the interfacial layers of electrode-barrier. Improvement in the coherence length, film roughness, and engineering of flux pinning centers remain open questions. Materials compatibility for tape production based on deposition techniques still require further control of grain growth modes.
Similarly, manufacturing of MgB2 wires and bulks share several of the challenges shown in the growth of thin film. The control of in-process phase for property homogeneity remains a multi-scale issue that relates from the compound physical-chemical properties to the constructive aspects of deposition reactors or sintering devices. Production scales are connected to the process physics, in which the material modality (i.e., powder, precursor gas, and liquid) determines the thermodynamic behavior of the MgB2 device. Growth modes are affected by process parameters such as pressure, temperature, deposition rate, and process atmosphere inertness. Yielded properties are driven by process conditions and controls, material purity and production scale. Such factors corroborate the performance of MgB2 superconductor devices, stability, and lifecycle. Successful strides in the directions pointed out in this manuscript may support closing the gap for application of MgB2 in a multitude of superconducting devices.
In summary, MgB2 remains as an alternative to a future replacement of Nb3Sn and NbTi for low-field applications and permanent magnets. To achieve this, hurdles concerning property reproducibility, in-operation stability, and improved process controllability are still open questions. Based on the applications evaluated in the literature, Fig. 11 exhibits a systematic diagram containing the modalities of MgB2 components driven by their respective applications. While the dimensions of devices described range from nanometer to the kilometer scales, the challenges concerning performance of MgB2 superconducting devices require control of the process thermodynamics. The precision of the manufacturing process dictates the superconducting phase stability, orientation, and stoichiometry; therefore, determining the operational stability and lifecycle of the devices.
Fig. 11. Summary of application MgB2 superconducting applications and related manufacturing processes.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supcon.2023.100083 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supcon.2023.100083.
[1]
Bud’ko SL, Canfield PC. Superconductivity of magnesium diboride. Physica C (Amsterdam, Neth) 2015; 514:142-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2015.02.024.

[2]
Tsuda S et al. Evidence for a multiple superconducting gap in MgB2 from highresolution photoemission spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett 2001; 87(17):177006. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.177006.

[3]
Nagamatsu J, Nakagawa N, Muranaka T, Zenitani Y, Akimitsu J. Superconductivity at 39 K in magnesium diboride. Nature 2001; 410 (6824):63-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/35065039.

[4]
Rowell J. Superior thin films. Nat Mater 2002; 1(1):5-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat713.

[5]
Zhou ZY, Xiao H, Wang S, Fu XH, Yan J. Preparation and DC characteristics of Mg B2/B/Mg B2 josephson junctions. Wuli Xuebao/Acta Physica Sinica 2016; 65 (18):. https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.65.180301180301.

[6]
Sharma RG. Practical magnesium diboride (MgB2) superconductor. Springer Ser Mater Sci 2021; 214:277-312.

[7]
Patel D et al. Superconducting joints using multifilament Mg B2 wires for MRI application. Scripta Materialia 2021; 204:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114156 [in English]11415610.

[8]
Hendrik et al. The effect of Ni doping in powder-in-tube-Mg B2material. In: AIP Conference Proceedings 2021. 2382. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0059999. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85113928584&doi=10.1063%2f5.0059999&partnerID=40&md5=471078920a9db5ac07b65578cb6378ae.

[9]
Li GZ, Sumption MD, Collings EW. Kinetic analysis of Mg B2 layer formation in advanced internal magnesium infiltration (AIMI) processed MgB2 wires. Acta Mater 2015; 96:66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.013.[in English].

[10]
Abhilash Kumar RG, Vinod K, Varghese N, Syamaprasad U. Reactivity of sheath materials with Mg/B in Mg B2 conductor fabrication. Supercond Sci Technol 2007; 20(3):222. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/20/3/018.

[11]
Zhang JY et al. The discrepancies in different facets of Mg B2 bulk superconductors prepared under various sintering durations by spark plasma sintering. Supercond Sci Tech. 2021; 34(4):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/abe3f2.[in English]04501110.

[12]
Jain A et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater 2013; 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323.

[13]
“mp-763: Mg B2 (hexagonal, P6/mmm, 191) (materialsproject.org).” https://materialsproject.org/materials/mp-763/.(accessed 2021).

[14]
Thompson J, et al. Physical and Material Properties of High Temperature Superconductors; 1994.

[15]
Jung MH et al. Anisotropic superconductivity in epitaxial Mg B2 films. Chem Phys Lett 2001; 343(5):447-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00778-3.

[16]
Li L, Zhang H, Yang YH, Miao GX. High-Quality epitaxial Mg B2 Josephson junctions grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Adv Eng Mater 2017; 19 (5):1600792. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201600792.

[17]
Shishido H, Nakagami T, Yoshida T, Ishida T. Epitaxial growth of superconducting MgB2 thin films with a Mg buffer layer at 110 °C. J Phys: Conf Ser 2017; 871. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/871/1/012036.

[18]
Ozaki T, Kikukawa S, Tanaka R, Yamamoto A, Tsuruta A, Tsuchiya Y. MgB2 thin films fabricated by pulsed laser deposition using Nd:YAG laser in an in situ two-step process. Condens Matter 2022; 7(3):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat7030048.

[19]
Xi XX et al. Progress in the deposition of MgB2 thin films. Supercond Sci Technol 2004; 17(5):S196. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/17/5/021.

[20]
Xi XX et al. MgB2 thin films by hybrid physical-chemical vapor deposition. Physica C 2007; 456(1):22-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2007.01.029.

[21]
Li YL, Kong XD, Han L. Analysis and mitigation of defective circular structures in HPCVD-grown MgB2 thin films. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 2020:770. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/770/1/012036.

[22]
Zhuang C, Chen K, Redwing JM, Li Q, Xi XX. Surface morphology and thickness dependence of the properties of MgB2 thin films by hybrid physical-chemical vapor deposition. Supercond Sci Technol 2010; 23(5):055004. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0953-2048/23/5/055004.

[23]
Zhuang CG et al. Ultrahigh current-carrying capability in clean MgB2 films. J Appl Phys 2008; 104(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2952052.

[24]
Zeng X et al. In situ epitaxial MgB2 thin films for superconducting electronics. Nat Mater 2002; 1(1):35-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat703.

[25]
Xi XX et al. In situ growth of MgB2 thin films by hybrid physical-chemical vapor deposition. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2003; 13(2):3233-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2003.812209.

[26]
Liu Z-K, Schlom DG, Li Q, Xi XX. Thermodynamics of the Mg-B system: Implications for the deposition of MgB2 thin films. Appl Phys Lett 2001; 78 (23):3678-80. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1376145.

[27]
Orgiani P et al. Investigations of MgB2/MgO and MgB2/AlN heterostructures for Josephson devices. IEEE Trans Appl Superconductivity 2005; 15(2 Part):228-31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2005.849764.

[28]
Chen K et al. MgB2/MgO/ MgB2 Josephson junctions for high-speed circuits. IEEE Trans Appl Superconductivity 2011; 1: 115-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2010.2093853.

[29]
Novoselov E, Cherednichenko S. Broadband MgB2 hot-electron bolometer THz mixers operating up to 20 K. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2017; 27(4):7820054. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2017.2654861.

[30]
Novoselov E, Cherednichenko S. Gain and noise in THz MgB2 Hot-electron bolometer mixers with a 30-K critical temperature. IEEE Trans Terahertz Sci Technol 2017; 7(6):704-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2017.2760105.

[31]
Novoselov E, Zhang N, Cherednichenko S. Study of MgB2 ultrathin films in submicron size bridges. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2017; 27(4):7792198. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2642052.

[32]
Seo YS, Lee JH, Kang WN, Hwang J. Revisiting optical properties of MgB2 with a high-quality sample prepared by a HPCVD method. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1):8977. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09248-4.

[33]
Ni Z et al. Fabrication and radio frequency test of large-area MgB2 films on niobium substrates. Supercond Sci Technol 2017; 30(4):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/aa5aa0045009.

[34]
Yang C et al. Intrinsic flux pinning mechanisms in different thickness MgB2 films. AIP Adv 2017; 7(3):. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4979075035117.

[35]
Guo Z et al. MgB2 thick films on three-dimensional structures fabricated by HPCVD. Supercond Sci Technol 2018; 31(6):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/aabb9b065005.

[36]
Guo Z et al. The preparation of cylindrical MgB2 films on stainless steel by HPCVD for magnetic shielding. Physica C (Amsterdam, Neth) 2018; 551:28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2018.06.002.

[37]
Pham D, Van Ngoc H, Jung SG, Kang DJ, Kang WN. Enhanced critical current density of MgB2 thin films deposited at low temperatures by ZnO seed impurity. Curr Appl Phys 2018; 18(6):762-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2018.03.008.

[38]
Wang HZ, Li YL, Wang Y, Gan ZZ. Growth and anisotropic transport properties of off-axis MgB2 thin films. Physica C (Amsterdam, Neth) 2020; 569:1353587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2019.1353587.

[39]
Yang W, Chen K, Cunnane D, Karasik BS, Xi X. Epitaxial Ultrathin MgB2 films on C-Terminated 6H-SiC (000-1) substrates grown by HPCVD. IEEE Trans Appl Superconductivity. 2022; 32:4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2021.3130104.

[40]
Yang W et al. Epitaxial ultrathin MgB2 films on C-Terminated 6H-SiC(0001) substrates grown by HPCVD. IEEE Trans Appl Superconductivity 2023: 33(5). https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2023.3235653.

[41]
Razeti M et al. Construction and operation of cryogen free ${\hbox{MgB}}_{2}$ magnets for open MRI systems. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2008; 18(2):882-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2008.920661.

[42]
Kováč P et al. DC characterization of advanced fine-filamentary MgB2 superconducting wires. Supercond Sci Technol 2022; 35(5):055004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ac4afe.

[43]
Bohnenstiehl SD, Susner MA, Dregia SA, Sumption MD, Donovan J, Collings EW. Experimental determination of the peritectic transition temperature of MgB2 in the Mg-B phase diagram. Thermochim Acta 2014; 576:27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2013.11.027.

[44]
Wang W, Wu Y, He Y, Gao P, Nijhuis A, Qin J. Heat transfer analysis of MgB2 coil in heat treatment process for future fusion reactor. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2023; 33(5):4200605. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2023.3244150.

[45]
Gao P et al. DC performance and AC loss of sub-size MgB2CICC conductor for fusion magnet application. Nucl Fusion 2022; 62(5):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac4acc056014.

[46]
Avcı D et al. Optimized superconducting MgB2 joint made by IMD technique. Supercond Sci Technol 2023; 36(7):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/accf3f075004.

[47]
L. Gozzelino et al., “Effects of nanoparticle doping on electrical properties of MgB2 bulks and wires obtained by reactive Mg liquid infiltration technique,” in IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 2007. 17, 2 ed.. 2726-2729. 10.1109/TASC.2007.897931. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34547421174&doi=10.1109%2fTASC.2007.897931&partnerID=40&md5=2e90b5eb60669671b145ff238d9d88f0.

[48]
Herbirowo S, Imaduddin A, Pramono AW, Saefuloh I. In-situ manufacturing of sic-doped mgb2 used for superconducting wire. Ann Chim Sci Mat 2021; 45 (2):175-9. https://doi.org/10.18280/ACSM.450210.

[49]
Ma L et al. Preparation of SiC doped In-Situ MgB2 mono- and 7-filamentary wires by continuous tube forming and filling technique. J Phys Conf Ser 2008; 97(1):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/97/1/012242012242.

[50]
Patel D et al. Superconducting Joining Concept for Internal Magnesium Diffusion- Processed Magnesium Diboride Wires. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2021; 13 (2):3349-57. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c17385.

[51]
Giunchi G, Coppi B. MgB2 coil options for fusion poloidal magnets. IEEE Trans Appl Superconductivity 2010; 20(3):1610-3. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2010.2043664.

[52]
Zhang D et al. Research on MgB2 superconducting magnet with iron core for MRI. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2010; 20(3):764-8., https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77952959561&doi=10.1109%2fTASC.2010.2042438&partnerID=40&md5=24410720d2fc94e1e18f9a63d00b5659. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2010.2042438.

[53]
Zhang D et al. Research on stability of MgB2 superconducting magnet for MRI Part 2. IEEE Trans Appl Superconductivity 2011; 213:2100-3. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2010.2089957.

[54]
Amin AA et al. Mechanical analysis of MgB2 based full body MRI coils under different winding conditions. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2017; 27(4):7820118. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2017.2654349.

[55]
Mine S et al. Second test coil for the development of a compact 3 T MgB2 magnet. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2013; 23(3):6376127. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2012.2232692.

[56]
Baig T et al. Conceptual designs of conduction cooled MgB2 magnets for 1.5 and 3.0 T full body MRI systems. Supercond Sci Technol Rev 2017; 30(4):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/aa609b043002.

[57]
Ballarino A et al. The BEST PATHS project on MgB2 superconducting cables for very high power transmission. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2016; 26(3):7438787. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2545116.

[58]
Sarmiento G et al. Design and testing of real-scale MgB2 coils for SUPRAPOWER 10-MW wind generators. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2016; 26(3):7397945. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2524460.

[59]
Bertola L, Cox T, Wheeler P, Garvey S, Morvan H. Superconducting electromagnetic launch system for civil aircraft. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2016; 26(8):7539345. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2598772.

[60]
Iwasa Y. Case Studies in Superconducting Magnets:Design and Operational Issues. 2 Aufl. ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2009.

[61]
Zhou S, Pan AV, Liu H, Dou S. Single- and multi-filamentary Fe-sheathed MgB2 wires. Physica C (Amsterdam, Neth) 2002; 382(4):349-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4534(02)01998-6.

[62]
Maeda M et al. Performance of MgB2 superconducting wire fabricated with nonidentical Mg particles. J Alloy Compd 2023; 954:170148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170148.

[63]
Melone M et al. Texture characterization of powder-in-tube Ti/ MgB2 superconducting cables. Mater Today: Proc 2019; 14:168-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.078.

[64]
Giunchi G et al. High performance new MgB2 superconducting hollow wires. Superconductor Sci Technol 2003; 16(2):285-91. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/16/2/328.

[65]
Alessandrini M, Fang H, Hanna M, Putman P, Zhou YX, Salama K. The potential application of MgB2 superconducting magnets in space. IEEE Trans Appl Superconductivity 2006; 16(2):1442-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2005.864483.

[66]
Giunchi G, Ripamonti G, Perini E, Cavallin T, Bassani E. Advancements in the reactive liquid Mg infiltration technique to produce long superconducting MgB2 tubular wires. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2007; 17(2):2761-5., https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34547544812&doi=10.1109%2fTASC.2007.900014&partnerID=40&md5=905fd319b0c54abab4a8c5a758b730e7. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2007.900014.

[67]
H. L. Suo et al., “High critical current densities in SiC doped in-situ MgB2 wires prepared by continuous tube forming and filling technique,” in IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 2007. 17, 2 ed.. 2822-2825. 10.1109/TASC.2007.897457. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34547478724&doi=10.1109%2fTASC.2007.897457&partnerID=40&md5=b37eb281253cf736c4585bd7a5c7d9eb.

[68]
Yamada H, Igarashi M, Kitaguchi H, Matsumoto A, Kumakura H. Influence of heat treatment on in situ powder-in-tube-processed MgB2 tapes with added ethyltoluene and SiC powder. Supercond Sci Technol 2009; 22(7):. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/22/7/075005075005.

[69]
Bovone G et al. Synthesis temperature effects on ex-situ manufactured MgB2 wires useful for power applications. J Alloy Compd 2016; 660:342-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.11.121.

[70]
Atamert S, Kutukcu MN, Scandella JL, Baskys A, Zhong Z, Glowacki BA. Novel superconducting MgB2 wires made by continuous process. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2016; 26(3):7445864. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2549559.

[71]
Kutukcu MN et al. Composite superconducting MgB2 wires made by continuous process. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2018; 28(4):6200704. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2018.2820730.

[72]
Glowacki BA et al. Comparative study of the continuous and batch thermal processing of MgB2 wires. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2019; 29(5):6200604. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2019.2900351.

[73]
Kodama M et al. High-performance dense MgB2 superconducting wire fabricated from mechanically milled powder. Supercond Sci Technol 2017; 30(4):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/aa5f36044006.

[74]
Dhakarwal M, Ogitsu T, Sugano M, Tanaka H, Watanabe H. Electromechanical characterization of the MgB2 wire for transmission line magnet system. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2019; 29(5):4802404. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2019.2903649.

[75]
Dai C et al. Impact of indentation on the performance of MgB2 round wire. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2017; 27(4):7835127. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2017.2660300.

[76]
He Y, Wang W, Nijhuis A, Qin J, Zhou C. Effect of heat treatment reaction time on the performance of MgB2 wires. IEEE Trans Appl Superconductivity 2022; 32:1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2021.3130097.

[77]
Pei X, Smith AC. Experimental testing and development of improved modelling for multistrand resistive SFCL. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2016; 26(4):7438803. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2545100.

[78]
Amin AA et al. Computational homogenization of the elastic and thermal properties of superconducting composite MgB2 wire. Compos Struct 2018; 188:313-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.060.

[79]
Yagai T et al. Development of design for large scale conductors and coils using MgB2 for superconducting magnetic energy storage device. Cryogenics 2018; 96:75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.10.006.

[80]
Kapolka M, Clegg M, Ruiz HS. Optimum filament positions within a MgB2 wire resulting in maximum reduction of AC losses. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2022; 32(4):6200305. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2022.3160145.

[81]
Erdem O. Comparative study of hot and cold press and their effect on superconducting properties of coronene added bulk MgB2. Physica C (Amsterdam, Neth) 2019; 565:1353508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2019.1353508.

[82]
Murakami A, Teshima H, Naito T, Fujishiro H, Kudo T, Iwamoto A. Lowtemperature mechanical properties of bulk MgB2 fabricated by hot isostatic pressing. Phys Procedia 2015; 67:982-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2015.06.166.

[83]
Noudem JG et al. Improvement of critical current density of MgB(2) bulk superconductor processed by Spark Plasma Sintering. J Am Ceram Soc 2020; 103 (11):6169-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.17366.[in English].

[84]
Ağıl H, Agil AA, Güner SB, Ayas E. Investigation of MgB2 bulk superconductors synthesized by in situ spark plasma sintering at different temperatures. Mater Chem Phys 2023; 306:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128010128010.

[85]
Schmidt J, Schnelle W, Grin Y, Kniep R. Pulse plasma synthesis and chemical bonding in magnesium diboride. Solid State Sci 2003; 5(4):535-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1293-2558(03)00026-8.

[86]
Prikhna T et al. Synthesis pressure-temperature effect on pinning in MgB2-based superconductors. J Supercond Nov Magn 2013; 26(5):1569-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-012-2001-7.[in English].

[87]
Sandu V, Aldica G, Damian R, Guo ZC, Suo HL. One-Step synthesis and sintering of MgB2 by Spark Plasma Sintering. J Supercond Nov Magn 2013; 26(2):361-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-012-1766-z.[in English].

[88]
Prakasam M, Balima F, Noudem J, Largeteau A. MgB2 ceramics by ultrahigh pressure field-assisted sintering. Ceramics 2020; 3(4):521-32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics3040042.

[89]
Gao Z et al. Microstructures and superconducting properties of MgB2 bulk samples processed by ultra-high pressure-assisted sintering. J Eur Ceram Soc 2022; 42(16):7481-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.09.008.

[90]
Badica P et al. Significant enhancement of the critical current density for cubic BN addition into ex situ spark plasma sintered MgB2. Supercond Sci Tech. 2014; 27(9):. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/27/9/095013.[in English] 095013.

[91]
Guo Z, Suo H, Sandu V, Aldica G. Experimental study on phase formation of SiC doped MgB2: processing of Mg-B-SiC powders by spark plasma sintering. Mater Res Innov 2014; 18(6):407-11. https://doi.org/10.1179/1433075x13y.0000000164.[in English].

[92]
Batalu D, Aldica G, Popa S, Kuncser A, Mihalache V, Badica P. GeO2-added MgB2 superconductor obtained by Spark Plasma Sintering. Solid State Sci 2015; 48:23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2015.06.013.[in English].

[93]
Batalu D, Aldica G, Badica P. Ge2C6H10O7- Added MgB2 superconductor obtained by ex-situ spark plasma sintering. IEEE Trans Appl Superconductivity. 2016; 6:3. https://doi.org/10.1109/Tasc.2016.2533560.[in English].

[94]
Ionescu AM et al. Spark plasma sintered MgB2 co-added with c-BN and C-60. Mater Chem Phys 2016; 170:201-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.12.040.[in English].

[95]
Noudem JG, Aburras M, Bernstein P, Chaud X, Muralidhar M, Murakami M. Development in processing of MgB2 cryo-magnet superconductors. J Appl Phys 2014; 116(16):28. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4900725.[in English].

[96]
Berger K et al. High magnetic field generated by bulk MgB2 prepared by spark plasma sintering. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2016; 26(3):1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/tasc.2016.2537143.[in English].

[97]
Murakami A, Iwamoto A, Noudem JG. Mechanical properties of bulk MgB2 superconductors processed by spark plasma sintering at various temperatures. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2018; 28(3):8234692. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2017.2786210.

[98]
Aldica G, Popa S, Enculescu M, Pasuk I, Ionescu AM, Badica P. Dwell time influence on spark plasma-sintered MgB2. J Supercond Nov Magn 2018; 31 (2):317-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-017-4236-9.[in English].

[99]
Güner SB et al. Investigation on superconducting and magnetic levitation force behaviour of excess Mg doped-bulk MgB2 superconductors. Cryogenics 2019; 101:131-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2019.05.002.

[100]
Koblischka MR, Wiederhold A, Koblischka-Veneva A, Chang C. Pinning force scaling analysis of polycrystalline MgB2. J Supercond Nov Magn 2020; 33 (11):3333-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-020-05456-8.[in English].

[101]
Matthews GAB, Liu J, Grovenor CRM, Grant PS, Speller S. Design and characterisation of ex situ bulk MgB2 superconductors containing a nanoscale dispersion of artificial pinning centres. Supercond Sci Technol 2020; 33(3):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ab6959034006.

[102]
Matthews GAB, Santra S, Ma R, Grovenor CRM, Grant PS, Speller SC. Effect of the sintering temperature on the microstructure and superconducting properties of MgB2 bulks manufactured by the field assisted sintering technique. Supercond Sci Technol 2020; 33(5):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ab7c53054003.

[103]
Guillon O et al. Field-Assisted sintering technology/spark plasma sintering: mechanisms, materials, and technology developments. Adv Eng Mater 2014; 16 (7):830-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201300409.

[104]
Xi D et al. Preparation of a small-size superconducting joint for C-doped 30- filament MgB2 wires. Supercond Sci Technol 2021; 34(12):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ac2f01125009.

[105]
Hušek I, Kováč P, Melišek T, Hain M. Superconducting joints between MgB2/Ni and MgB2/Nb composite wires, their transport currents and micro-structure. Ceram Int 2023; 49(7):11178-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.314.

[106]
Patel D et al. MgB2 superconducting joint architecture with the functionality to screen external magnetic fields for MRI magnet applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2022; 14(2):3418-26. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c19581.

[107]
Hapipi NM et al. Excess Mg in situ powder addition for enhancing critical current density of ex situ MgB2. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 2022; 128(10):913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-022-06060-4.

[108]
Miryala M et al. Enhancing critical current density of bulk MgB2 via nanoscale boron and Dy2O3 doping. Adv Eng Mater 2022; 24(11):2200487. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202200487.

[109]
Da Silva LBS, Serquis A, Hellstrom EE, Rodrigues D. The effect of AlB2 addition on MgB2 superconducting bulks. Supercond Sci Technol 2023; 36(4):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/acbe22045013.

[110]
Gao Z, Grovenor CRM, Speller SC. Correlation between microstructure and superconducting properties of MgB2 bulk samples with Mg addition and Mg/hBN co-additions. Supercond Sci Technol 2023; 36(9):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ace662094001.

[111]
Grivel $J_C$. Effect of Rb2CO3 and Cs2CO3 on MgB2 in polycrystalline bulk samples. Physica C (Amsterdam, Neth) 2023; 609:1354260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2023.1354260.

[112]
Taylan Koparan E, Güner SB, Aksoy C, Savas¸kan B. The effect of nano-Pt/nano- SiC co-additions on superconducting properties of bulk MgB2. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 2023; 34(18):1424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023-10842-8.

[113]
Carvalho de Castro Sene F, Xing Y, Bernstein P, Noudem J, Sawhney R. Propertymicrostructure analysis and statistical qualification of MgB2 bulks: an investigation via micrograph feature extraction. Mater Today Commun 2024; 38:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107618107618.

[114]
Hirshorn SR. Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering. Volume 2: Crosscutting Topics, Special Topics, and Appendices, Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); 2016.

[115]
Tillack MS et al. An evaluation of fusion energy R&D gaps using technology readiness levels. Fusion Sci Technol 2009; 56(2):949-56. https://doi.org/10.13182/FST09-A9033.

[116]
Hishinuma Y et al. Development of MgB2 superconducting wire for the low activation superconducting magnet system operated around core D-T plasma. Fusion Eng Des 2015;98-99:1076-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.05.005.

[117]
Coppi B et al. New developments, plasma physics regimes and issues for the Ignitor experiment. Nucl Fusion 2013; 53(10):. https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/53/10/104013104013.

[118]
Mitrishkin YV, Korenev PS, Konkov AE, Kartsev NM, Smirnov IS. New horizontal and vertical field coils with optimised location for robust decentralized plasma position control in the IGNITOR tokamak. Fusion Eng Des 2022; 174:112993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112993.

[119]
Mitchell N et al. Superconductors for fusion: a roadmap. Supercond Sci Tech, Rev 2021; 34(10):57. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ac0992.[in English].

[120]
Yao C, Ma YW. Superconducting materials: challenges and opportunities for large-scale applications. iScience 2021; 24(6):17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102541.[in English].

[121]
Zucchetti M et al. Neutronics scoping studies for experimental fusion devices. Fusion Sci Technol 2019; 75(6):423-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2019.1613141.[in English].

[122]
Bigot B. Progress toward ITER's first plasma. Nucl Fusion 2019; 59(11):11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab0f84.[in English].

[123]
Titus PH, Kessel C. FNSF Structural Sizing Studies. Fusion Sci Technol 11:1898303. https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2021.

[124]
Zhai YH, Kessel C, Barth C, Senatore C. High-performance superconductors for fusion nuclear science facility. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2017; 27(4):4200505. https://doi.org/10.1109/tasc.2016.2627010.

[125]
Cai Q et al. Doping-Induced Isotopic (MgB2)-B-11 bulk superconductor for fusion application. Energies 2017; 10(7):409. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10030409.

Outlines

/