专业学习共同体实用效果研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2016.05.009

当代外语研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05): 69-74.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2016.05.009

专业学习共同体实用效果研究

徐玲

广东技术师范学院,广州,510665

出版日期:2016-09-28 发布日期:2020-07-25
作者简介:徐玲,广东技术师范学院大学英语部副教授、硕士生导师。主要研究方向为英语教学、教师发展。电子邮箱:475347537@qq.com
基金资助:
^*本文是广东省教育厅高等教育教改项目“基于学习共同体的大学英语教学团队建设研究”(编号GDJG20142343)以及广东教育研究院课题“教育国际化与中外合作教师培训研究——基于需求和案例的视角”(编号GDJY-2014-B-b253)的成果之一。

A Study on Implementation Result of Teachers' Professional Learning Community

XU Ling

Online:2016-09-28 Published:2020-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 专业学习共同体(PLC)是研究教师专业发展的重要概念。国内外相关文献表明它既是促进教师专业发展的有效方法,又是有效提升教学质量的关键,但国内学者对其准确含义的理解仍有待提高。文章对专业学习共同体这一概念的含义、特征、组成、执行障碍、教师在PLC中的角色和行为等进行了深入系统的剖析与归纳。据此,研究者特意设计了质量型开放性调查问卷,对大学英语后续课程建设团队成员进行匿名调研,使用主题分析法对调研结果进行分析论证并总结其实效与不足。

关键词: 专业学习共同体, 教师角色, 大学英语后续课程

Abstract: Professional learning community (PLC) is an important concept in the field of teachers' professional development. According to some relevant literature published in China and overseas, it is an effective method for promoting teachers' professional development, and a critical approach for effectively improving teaching quality. However, the accurate definition of it has not yet been known to researchers in China. This article tries to give a systematic analysis and summary to the definition, characteristics, components of PLC, the barriers of performing it and teacher's roles and behaviors in PLC. For these purposes, a qualitative open ended questionnaire and anonymous method have been used to collect data. And theme analysis has been used to analyze and discuss the result. Validity and limitations are specified at the end.

中图分类号:

H319

徐玲. 专业学习共同体实用效果研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(05): 69-74.

XU Ling. A Study on Implementation Result of Teachers' Professional Learning Community[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2016, 16(05): 69-74.

参考文献

Agar, M. & T.R. Hobbs. 1982. Interpreting discourse: Coherence and the analysis of ethnographic Interview [J]. Discourse Processes (5):1-32.
Alberta Education. 2006. Professional learning communities: An exploration [R]. Alberta: InPraxis Group Inc.
Bolam, R., A. McMahon, L. Stoll, S.Thomas, M. Wallace, K. Hawkey & A. Greenwood. 2005. Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities [R]. DfES Research Report RR637.
Buffman, A., M. Mattos & C. Weber. 2009. Pyramid Response to Intervention [M]. Bloomington: in Solution Tree.
DuFour, R. 2004. What is a “professional learning community”? [J]. Educational Leadership 61(8): 6-11.
Eaker R, R. Dufour & R. Burnette. 2002. Getting Started: Reculturing Schools to Become Professional Learning Communities [M]. Bloomington: National Educational Service.
Hargreaves, D.H. 2011. Leading a self-improving school system [R]. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. 8-10.
Hattie, J. 2012. Visible learning for teachers: Maximising impact on learning [J]. Taylor & Francis, Volume 28(2): 215-216.
Hollins, E.R., L.R. McIntyre, C. DeBose, K.S. Hollins & A. Towner. 2004. Promoting a self-sustaining learning community: Investigating an internal model for teacher development [J]. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 17(2):247-264.
Jack, A. & A. Lougée. 2012. WCPSS 2010-11 to 2011-12 school-based PLT policy study [R]. D&A Report No 12.02.
Marzano, R.J. 2003. What works in schools: Translating research into action [J]. Academic Achievement 4(643):76-77.
Mitchell, C. 2007. Principles of engagement: Building sustainable learning communities [J]. Changing Perspectives (2): 13-16.
Schleicher, A.E. 2012. Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century lessons from around the world [J]. Oecd Publishing (112):45-53.
Schmoker W.C. & L. Feun. 2007. Implementation of learning community principles: A study of six high schools [J]. NASSP Bulletin 91(2):141-160.
Solansky, S.T. 2008. Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams [J]. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies (14):332-341.
Stoll, L., R. Bolam, A. McMahon, S. Thomas, M. Wallace, A. Greenwood & K. Hawkey. 2006. Professional Learning Communities: Source Materials for School Leaders and Other Leaders of Professional Learning [M]. London: Innovation Unit, DfES, NCSL and GTC.
Vescio, V., D. Ross & A. Adams. 2008. A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 80-91.
Wahlstrom, K. & K.S. Louis. 2008. How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility [J]. Educational Administration Quarterly 44(4):458-495.
Wells, C. & L. Feun. 2007. Implementation of learning community principles: A study of six high schools [J]. NASSP Bulletin 91(2): 141-160.
李桂娴、郭英. 2014. 专业学习共同体对教学实践与学业成就的影响[J]. 教学与管理(3):37-40.
林美. 2013. 国外教师专业学习共同体研究述评[J]. 教育导刊(11):38-41.
林美. 2015. 教师专业学习共同体的制度化互动研究——以Q校英语教研组研讨课互动为例[J].当代教育科学(6):22-27.
时长江、刘彦朝、张胜红. 2007. “学习共同体”教学模式在思政课中的应用[J]. 中国高等教育(22): 30-32.
王姣莉. 2014. 教师专业学习共同体研究述评[J].当代教师教育(1):32-38/89.
王晓芳. 2014. 什么样的“共同体”可以称作教师专业学习共同体——对教师专业学习共同体理论的审视与反思[J]. 教师教育研究(4):16-22.
杨甲睿、张洁. 2013. U-S协作型专业学习共同体——国外教师专业化发展的新路径[J]. 高教探索(2):134-139.
杨文明. 2013. 专业学习共同体:缘起、内涵及运行策略[J].高教探索(4):17-21.
于金明. 2015. 初中英语教师专业学习共同体与自我效能感的相关性研究[J]. 教学与管理(21):41-43.
张立平. 2015. 十年教师专业学习共同体研究文献述评[J].教师教育论坛(1):73-80.
赵静. 2012. 教师专业学习共同体研究述评[J].中国教师(23):52-54/66.
郑鑫、张佳. 2015. 中西方教师专业学习共同体的差异:跨文化比较的视角[J]. 外国教育研究(8):83-94.

[1]	张艳. 高校英语教师后续课程资源开发现状研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(02): 63-68.
[2]	吕海霞, 安晓灿. 大学英语数字化写作环境下教师角色的自我认知调查[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(10): 36-40.

专业学习共同体实用效果研究

A Study on Implementation Result of Teachers' Professional Learning Community

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价