试论分布形态学词根插入模式及相关汉语研究的得失

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据分布形态学理论发展历程,目前其内部最大的分歧体现于词根的不同插入模式上。围绕着词根究竟是先行插入还是延迟插入,该理论可以分为三种模式:先行插入模式、延迟插入模式和有限先行插入模式。不同的插入模式对应着不同的研究理念和方法,也存在着相应的优缺点。在上述探讨的基础之上,本文简要评价了基于该理论的汉语本体研究的得失。

关键词: 词根, 插入模式, 汉语研究

Abstract: The biggest difference within Distributed Morphology (DM) has been around the different models of lexical insertion of roots. Based on the modes of early or late insertion of roots, Distributed Morphology can be divided into three patterns: the early insertion model, the late insertion model and the limited early insertion model. Different models have been put forward on the basis of different theoretical assumptions and methods, which possess the related advantages and disadvantages in empirical studies. Finally, the studies on Chinese based on DM are commented on.

中图分类号:

王焕池. 试论分布形态学词根插入模式及相关汉语研究的得失[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(05): 12-18.

WANG Huanchi. A Tentative Discussion on Different Models of Lexical Insertion of Roots in DM and the Related Chinese Studies[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2013, 13(05): 12-18.

参考文献

Acquaviva, P. 2008. Roots and Lexicality in Distributed Morphology [D]. University College Dublin.
Borer, H. 2005. In Name Only [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, H. 2009. Roots and Categories [R]. Talk presented at the 19^th Colloquium of Generative Grammar, University of the Basque Country, April, 1-3.
Crystal, D. 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (6th ed.) [M]. MA: Blackwell.
Dai, X. L. 1992. Chinese Morphology and its Interface with the Syntax [D]. Ohio State University.
De Belder, M. N. R. 2011. Roots and Affixes: Eliminating Lexical Categories from Syntax [D]. Universiteit Utrecht.
Embick, D. 2000. Features, syntax and categories in the Latin perfect [J]. Linguistic Inquiry (2): 185-230.
Embick, D. 2010. Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Embick, D. & M. Halle. 2005. On the status of stems in morphological theory [A]. In T. Geerts & H. Jacobs (eds.). Proceedings of Going Romance 2003 [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 59-88.
Embick, D. & R. Noyer. 2001. Movement operation after syntax [J]. Linguistic Inquiry (4): 555-95.
Embick, D. & R. Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface [A]. In G. Ramschand & C. Reiss (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistics Interfaces [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 289-324.
Embick, D. & A. Marantz. 2008. Architecture and blocking [J]. Linguistic Inquiry (1): 1-53.
Halle, M. & A. Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection [A]. In S. J. Keyser & K. Hale (eds.). 1993. The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger [C]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 111-76.
Halle, M. & A. Marantz. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology [A]. In A. Carnie & H. Harley (eds.). MIT Working Papers of Linguistics 21: Papers on Phonology and Morphology [C]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 275-88.
Harley, H. 2010. Compounding in distributed morphology [A]. In R. Lieber & P. Stekauer (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Compounding [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 129-44.
Harley, H. 2012. On the Identity of Roots [D]. University of Arizona.
Harley, H. & R. Noyer. 1999. Distributed morphology [J]. Glot International (4): 3-9.
Harley, H. & R. Noyer. 2000. Licening in the non-lexicalist lexicon [A]. In Bert Peeters (ed.). The Lexicon/Encyclopedia Interface [C]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Press. 349-74.
Haugen, J. & D. Siddiqi. 2012. Roots and the Derivation [D]. Oberlin College.
Marantz, A. 1997. No Escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon [A]. In A. Dimitriadis et al. (eds.). Penn Working Papers in Linguistic 4 [C]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 201-25.
Marantz, A. 2007. Phases and words [A]. In S. H. Choe (ed.). Phases in the Theory of Grammar [C]. Seoul: Dong In Publisher. 191-222.
Newell, H. 2008. Aspects of the Morphology and Phonology of Phases [D]. McGill University.
Packard, J. 2000. The Morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pfau, R. 2000. Features and Categories in Language Production [D]. University of Frankfurt.
Siddiqi, D. 2006. Minimize Exponence: Economy Effects on a Model of the Morphosyntactic Component of the Grammar [D]. University of Arizona.
Siddiqi, D. 2009. Syntax within Words: Economy, Allomorphy, and Argument Selection in Distributed Morphology [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Siddiqi, D. 2010. Distributed morphology [J]. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7): 524-42.
Xue, Nianwen. 2001. Defining and Automatically Identifying Words in Chinese [D]. University of Delaware.
Zhang, Nina Ning. 2007. Root merger in Chinese compounds [J]. Studia Linguistica (2): 170-84.
Zwart, J. W. 2010. Structure and order: Asymmetric merge [A]. In C. Coeckx (ed.). Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 96-118.
常辉、姜孟.2010.分布形态学理论述评[J].当代外语研究(4):6-12.
李红兵.2006.分布形态学理论:一种新的句法形态接口理论[J].解放军外国语学院学报(5):6-12.
李素枝.2011.分布形态学框架下的汉语存现句结构类型分析[J].河南师范大学学报(哲社版):234-36.
林巧莉、韩景泉.2011.从“分布形态学理论”看汉语的词类[J].外国语(2):47-55.
王奇.2008.分布形态学[J].当代语言学(1):20-25.

[1]	胡壮麟. 后韩礼德时代功能语言学的发展趋势[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 451(1): 44-53.
[2]	姚小平. 从晚明《葡汉词典》看中西词汇的接触[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(09): 1-10.
[3]	陆俭明;. 在现代汉语研究的道路上[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(06): 1-9+79.
[4]	邢福义;. 我的为学轨迹与领悟[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(04): 1-6.