FAN Zhenqiang. The Contextual Effects and Motivation of Tautology within Neo-cognitive Pragmatics[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 12-16.
Builhof, J. & S. Gimbel. 2004. A tautology is a tautology (or is it?) [J]. Journal of Pragmatics (36): 1003-05. Fiske, S. T. 2004. Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Gibbs, R. R. & N. S. McCarrell, 1990. Why boys will be boys and girls will be girls: Understanding colloquial tautologies [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19: 125-45. Meibauer, J. 2008. Tautology as presumptive meaning [J]. Pragmatics and Cognition 16(3): 440-70. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought [M]. New York: Basic books. Macrae, C, N., C. Stangor & M. Hewstone. 1996. Stereotypes and Stereotyping [M]. New York: Guilford. Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition [M]. Oxford: Blackwell. 陈新仁.2011.新认知语用学——认知语言学视野中的认知语用研究[J].外语学刊(9):40-44. 范振强.2014.同语的双重指称及其实现:从语言哲学到体验哲学[J].江汉学术(5):101-07. 范振强.2015.同语式“N是N”的理解机制新探:动态范畴构建视角[J].外语教学(4):28-33. 姜晖.2013.XBEY结构意义形成的认知语义阐释[J].外语与外语教学(2):56-59. 何自然、冉永平.2009.新编语用学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社. 李小飞、范振强.2010.具身哲学视域下的范畴动态构建观[J].山东社会科学(12):113-16. 刘正光.2005.非理想的语言事实在理论建设中的地位与作用——“同义反复”的非范畴化理论解释[J].现代外语(2):111-21. 吕平.2009.别让粽子变了“味”[N].钱江晚报(05-29):A5. 马文、范振强.2007.名词性同义反复语的多视角研究[J].贵州大学学报(社会科学版)(1):103-09. 苗兴伟.2011.关联理论对语篇连贯性的解释力[A].吴炳章、徐盛桓.认知语用学研究[C].上海:上海外语教育出版社.223-33. 冉永平.2012.词汇语用新探[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社. 邵敬敏.1986.同语式探讨[J].语文研究(1):13-19. 王寅.2007.认知语言学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社. 王寅.2013.新认知语用学——语言的认知社会研究取向[J].外语与外语教学(1):1-4. 于林龙.2012.隐喻思维与意义的不确定性[J].东北师范大学学报(6):108-111. 张炼强.2012.“X是X”的语言和逻辑综合探究[A].张炼强.修辞认知理论与实践[C].北京:首都师范大学出版社.302-55.