Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06): 5-11.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.06.002
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Huajing
Online:2015-06-28
Published:2020-07-25
CLC Number:
TIAN Huajing. Construing Identity through Attitudinal Analysis: A Case Study of One Report in The Sydney Morning Herald[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(06): 5-11.
| Coffin, C. & K. O’Halloran. 2006. The role of appraisal and corpus in detecting covert evaluation [J]. Functions of Language 13(1): 77-110. Halliday, M. A. K. & C. Mathiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) [M]. London: Arnold. Jullian, P. M. 2011. Appraising through someone else’s words: The evaluative power of quotations in news reports [J]. Discourse and Society 22(6): 766-80. Khoo, K. S.G., A. Nourbakhsh & J. Ch. Na. 2012. Sentiment analysis of online news text: A case study of appraisal theory [J]. Online Information Review 36(6): 858-78. Kim, H. J. & G.T. Cameron. 2011. Emotion matters in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the public’s response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response [J]. Communication Research 38(6): 826-55. Martin, J. R. 2000. Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English [A]. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.). Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse [C]. Oxford: OUP. 142-75.Martin, J. R. 2004. Mourning: How we get aligned [J]. Discourse & Society 15(2-3): 321-44. Martin, J. R. & D. Rose. 2007. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause (2nd ed.) [M]. London & New York: Continuum. Martin, J. R. & P. R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Pounds, G. 2010. Attitude and subjectivity in Italian and British hard-news reporting: The construction of a culture-specific “reporter” voice [J]. Discourse Studies 12(1): 106-37. Thomson, E. A., P. R. R. White & P. Kitley. 2008. “Objectivity” and “hard news” reporting across cultures [J]. Journalism Studies 9(2): 212-28. White, P. R. R. 2004. Subjectivity, evaluation and point of view in media discourse [A]. In C. Coffin, A. Hewings & K. O’Halloran (eds.). Applying English Grammar [C]. London: Arnold. 229-46. Yell, S. 2012. Natural disaster news and communities of feeling: The affective interpellation of local and global publics [J]. Social Semiotics 22(4): 409-28. 陈晓燕.2007.英汉社论语篇态度资源对比分析[J].外国语(3):39-46. 陈晓燕、王彦.2010.英汉社论语篇评价系统对比分析之二——介入资源[J].山东外语教学(6):20-27. 赖彦、辛斌.2012.英语新闻语篇互文修辞功能分析——从评价理论的视角[J].当代修辞学(3):25-32. 李长忠、眭丹娟.2012.中美英语报刊社论语篇的介入资源对比研究[J].徐州师范大学学报38(5):67-72. 李国庆、孙韵雪.2007.新闻语篇的评价视角——从评价理论的角度看社论的价值取向[J].广东外语外贸大学学报18(4):90-93. 廖麦.2010.新闻语篇的评价性资源分析[J].新闻爱好者(9):106-07. 刘立华、孙炬.2008.社论体裁中评价的社会建构功能研究——以《人民日报》为例[J].山东外语教学(3):18-25. 刘世铸、韩金龙.2004.新闻话语的评价系统[J].外语电化教学(98):17-21. 刘婷婷、徐加新.2011.英汉政治社论语篇级差资源对比研究——基于评价理论的新闻语篇分析[J].外语艺术教育研究(3):31-37. 刘悦明.2012.《人民日报》元旦社论语篇评价手段历时分析[J].西安外国语大学学报20(2):26-30. 王欢、王国凤.2012.语言语境与新闻理解——英语硬新闻语篇评价策略解读[J].外语教学与研究44(5):671-81. 王天华.2008.新闻语篇中的隐性评价与动态读者定位[D].济南:山东大学. 王天华.2012.新闻语篇隐性评价意义的语篇发生研究[J].外语学刊(1):104-07. 王振华.2001.评价系统及其运作——系统功能语言学的新发展[J].外国语(6):13-20. 王振华.2004.“硬新闻”的态度研究——“评价系统”的应用研究之二[J].外语教学25(5):31-36. 肖征、荣风静.2010.英文报纸社论的评价意义分析[J].语文学刊(3):109-15. 张丽君、鄢菁萍.2009.新闻评论中介入资源的人际意义探析[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版)11(5):355-56. 郑群、翟霞.2010.评价理论视角下的“硬新闻”立场探析[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版)37(11):91-93. |
| [1] | M. A. K. Halliday, HE Yuanxiu, YANG Bingjun. The Marxist Orientation of Systemic Functional Linguistics: A Special Interview with Professor Halliday [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 1-3. |
| [2] | ZHU Yongsheng. How Do We Know a Child Has Entered Adult Language Period? [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 4-7. |
| [3] | LI Hui, LI Quanhao, QIAO Quandi. Variation Study on Sellers’ Phatic Greetings in On-line Shopping Conversations [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 17-22. |
| [4] | MAO Junhan. The Pragmatic Analysis of Response Strategies in the Conflict Talk between Mother-in-law and Daughter-in-law [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 23-29. |
| [5] | JI Xiyuan. A Pragmatic Study of Mitigating Strategies for Interpersonal Conflicts in Unequal Power Relations [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 30-34. |
| [6] | BAO Liuya. Power Relations of The Munich Pact from the Systemic Functional Perspective [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(06): 12-16. |
| [7] | YU Meixin. Interpersonal Strategies Used in Defense Discourse in Chinese Criminal Trials: From the Systemic Functional Perspective [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(06): 17-22. |
| [8] | LI Xuejiao. A Contrastive Analysis of the Discrepant Phenomenon in JUDGEMENT and APPRECIATION [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(01): 20-24. |
| [9] | DONG Baohua. Re-explaining Metafunctions of Formal Markers: A Case Study of the Cryptofunctions of Prop it [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(01): 6-13. |
| [10] | ZHANG Xiangang. A Systemic Functional Semiotic Study of the Logogenesis of Journal Article Abstracts in Linguistics [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(01): 14-19. |
| [11] | LI Jing. A Writer Reader Interaction Mechanism from SFL and CL Perspectives: Taking an American Stand-up Comedy Text as an Example [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(01): 25-31. |
| [12] | WANG Tingjia, HUANG Guowen. On M. A. K. Halliday's Studies of the Cantonese Dialect [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(07): 12-16. |
| [13] | SHANG Guowen. Grammar Grounded in Use: Usage-based Theory in Cognitive Linguistics [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(07): 17-21. |
| [14] | WANG Yin. On Qian Guanlian’s Academic Thread of Thought and Its Value [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(06): 14-19. |
| [15] | LIU Limin. “Dao” and “Logos”: Language Perspective of Cultural Differences between Chinese and Western Thoughts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(06): 59-69. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
