doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2021.02.008

Abstract

CLC Number:

H319

Figures/Tables 3

References 35

[1]	Cap P. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[2]	Cap P. 2017. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse[M]. London: Springer.
[3]	Chilton P. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice[M]. London: Routledge.
[4]	Davies M. 2019. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 1990-2019 [DB/OL]. [2020-06-20]. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.
[5]	Fairclough N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language[M]. London: Longman.
[6]	Fauconnier G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think[M]. New York: Basic Books.
[7]	Fauconnier G. 1985. Mental Spaces [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[8]	Foucault M. 1980. The History of Sexuality: Volume I: An Introduction[M]. New York: Vintage.
[9]	Gomez M. C. 2009. Towards a new approach to the linguistic definition of euphemism[J]. Language Sciences 31(6):725-739.
[10]	Hart C. 2014. Construal operations in online press reports of political protests [A]. In C. Hart & P. Cap (eds.). Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies [C]. London: Bloomsbury. 167-188.
[11]	Hart C. 2018. Riots engulfed the city: An experimental study investigating the legitimating effects of fire metaphors in discourse of disorder[J]. Discourse and Society (3):279-298.
[12]	Kress G. 1985. Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[13]	Lakoff G. & M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought[M]. New York: Basic Books.
[14]	Lakoff G. 1996. The metaphor system for morality [A]. In A. E. Goldberg (ed.). Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language[C]. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 249-266.
[15]	Langacker R. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[16]	Simpson J. A & E. S. C. Weiner. 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edition) [Z]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[17]	Thompson J. B. 1990. Ideology and Modern Culture [M]. Cambridge: Polity Press.
[18]	Urbandictionary. 2008. Socially challenged [Z/OL]. [2020-08-20]. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=socially%20challenged.
[19]	van Dijk, T. A. 1995. Discourse semantics and ideology[J]. Discourse and Society (2):243-289.
[20]	van Dijk, T. A. 2006. Ideology and discourse analysis[J]. Journal of Political Ideologies 11(2):115-140.
[21]	Wiktionary. 2005. Mentally challenged [Z/OL]. [2020-08-20]. https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/mentally_challenged.
[22]	陈望道. 2008. 修辞学发凡[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社.
[23]	邓兆红、陈新仁. 2016. 委婉语修辞效果的关联论阐释——兼论心理距离说[J]. 外语学刊 (6):26-30.
[24]	丁建新、廖益清. 2001. 批评话语分析述评[J]. 当代语言学 (4):305-310.
[25]	孔庆成. 1993. 委婉语言现象的立体透视[J]. 外国语(上海外国语学院学报) (2):28-32.
[26]	李军华. 2004. 关于委婉语的定义[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (4):162-165.
[27]	束定芳. 1989. 委婉语新探[J]. 外国语(上海外国语学院学报) (3):30-36.
[28]	田海龙、赵芃. 2017. 批评话语分析再思考——基于辩证唯物主义的语言与社会关系研究[J]. 当代语言学 19(4):494-506.
[29]	王寅. 2006. 解读语言形成的认知过程——七论语言的体验性:详解基于体验的认知过程[J]. 四川外语学院学报 (6):53-59.
[30]	王寅. 2014. 语言哲学研究——21世纪中国后语言哲学沉思录[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[31]	辛斌. 2006. 福柯的权力论与批评性语篇分析[J]. 外语学刊 (2):1-6.
[32]	张辉、杨艳琴. 2019. 批评认知语言学:理论基础与研究现状[J]. 外语教学 40(3):1-11.
[33]	张汝伦. 2003. 马克思的哲学观和“哲学的终结”[J]. 中国社会科学 (4):44-54.
[34]	张天伟、郭彬彬. 2016. 批评话语分析中的话语策略和识解操作研究[J]. 外语教学 37(6):17-22.
[35]	赵永峰. 2020. 福柯话语权力视域下社会隐转喻研究——以美国政治正确类表达为例[J]. 天津外国语大学学报 27(1):35-46.

类别	语例(表中只列出“*ly”变量)	数量	占比 (%)
身体	physically;intellectually;vertically;developmentally;hormonally;cognitively;calorically;vocally;verbally;thinly;pigmentally;nutritionally;non-pigmentally;follicly;energetically;behaviorally;colickly;cerebrallly;cardiovascularly;aesthetically	20	30.3
生活	technologically;technically;navigationally;telescopically;electronically;financially;economically;fiscally;legally;electorally;domestically;gastronomically;genealogically;hygienically;conventionally;sartorially	16	24.2
能力	socially;historically;defensively;offensively;temporally;stylistically;punctually;directionally;dexterously;aeronautically;argumentively	11	16.7
教育文化	mathematically;musically;artistically;grammatically;semantically;scientifically;racially;botanically;educationally;culturally	10	15.2
精神	mentally; ethically;charismatically;emotionally;morally;romantically;spiritually;relationally;diabolically	9	13.6
总计		66	100

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 35

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WENG Jingle, WENG Fengxiang. Comments on Three Hot Issues of Business English Development [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 106-114.
[2]	LI Rui. Forms and Functions of the Pre-Front Field Position in Spoken German: On the Possibility of Modern Chinese as a Speech-Oriented Language [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 115-125.
[3]	WANG Kefei. Challenges to Foreign Language Teachers and Their Vision-Based Solutions [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 5-11.
[4]	GAO Yanmei, ZHOU Jiangping. Semantic Density, Syntactic Complexity and Disciplinary Knowledge Coding [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 55-67.
[5]	ZHAN Shuangjuan. The Development of Ideological and Political Education of College English Curriculum: Advantages, Missions and Approaches [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 68-75.
[6]	LI Yan, LI Tao. An Experimental Study on Development of Critical Thinking Dispositions of English Majors through Peer Feedback in EFL Writing [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 76-85.
[7]	ZANG Qing, XU Haiming, GUAN Jingjing. The Reading & Writing Dual-Chained Model of L2 Writing Instruction: Its Rationale and Practice [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 86-94.
[8]	ZHUO Li, YOU Zeshun. Constructing Deontic Stance in Chinese White Papers on China-US Trade Disputes [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 95-105.
[9]	WANG Yangyu. An Empirical Study of the Awareness of English as a Lingua Franca in Classroom Teaching [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 146-154.
[10]	ZHOU Weijing, WANG Suwan. A Review of 20-Year Corpus-based Research on Oral English Teaching in China from 2002 to 2021 [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(4): 123-132.
[11]	ZOU Shaoyan, FAN Jingsong. Pinpointing Analytic Rating Criteria for EFL Writing Assessment from Raters’ Perspectives [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(4): 133-143.
[12]	YANG Yi, CHEN Changlai. Multimodal Discourse Analysis: A New Paradigm of Teacher Discourse Research [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(4): 144-153.
[13]	CHEN Lang, SUN Zhongguang. Structure Interpreting Competence Research as a Famework of Multivariants [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(4): 58-69.
[14]	ZHONG Lijia, GUO Cong. An Empirical Study on Promoting Effective Mental Processing in Consecutive Interpreting [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(4): 87-97.
[15]	GAI Feihong. Developments of Language Transfer Studies during the Past 30 Years [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(3): 113-121.