不同立管结构下严重段塞流特性的对比实验研究

海洋工程装备与技术 ›› 2015, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1): 18-22.

• 海洋油气勘探开发技术与装备 • 上一篇下一篇

不同立管结构下严重段塞流特性的对比实验研究

叶晶¹, 郭烈锦^1,^*, 陈森林¹, 李清平², 李乃良²

1. 西安交通大学动力工程多相流国家重点实验室,陕西西安 710049
2. 中海油研究总院,北京 100028

收稿日期:2014-10-17 出版日期:2015-02-20 发布日期:2016-03-31
通讯作者: 郭烈锦
作者简介:
作者简介:叶晶(1984--),男,博士研究生,主要从事油气水多相流动研究.
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05026-004-02)

Comparative Experimental Study on Severe Slugging Characteristics in Different Riser Shapes

Jing YE¹, Lie-jin GUO¹, Sen-lin CHEN¹, Qing-ping LI², Nai-liang LI²

1. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China
2. CNOOC Research Institute, Beijing 100028, China

Received:2014-10-17 Online:2015-02-20 Published:2016-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究了两种不同上升立管结构下的严重段塞流特性,包括严重段塞流发生区域,立管底部压力波动,周期以及液塞长度,并将所得S型柔性立管中气水两相流流型图与典型的严重段塞流流型转变准则进行了比较.实验发现:两种立管结构下严重段塞流流动过程类似,S型柔性立管中的流动比竖直立管中多出压力二次增长过程;与竖直立管中的流动相比,S型柔性立管中流动的周期更长而相对液塞长度较小;S型柔性立管中严重段塞流发生区域比竖直立管中发生区域小.

关键词: 海底管道, 严重段塞流, 竖直立管, S型柔性立管, 流型图

Abstract:

The characteristics of severe slugging flow in two types of riser systems are studied, including occurrence region, pressure fluctuations at riser base, cycle time, and liquid slug length. The flow pattern map in S-shaped flexible riser is compared with the classical severe slugging flow transition criteria. The experimental results show that the severe slugging cycles are similar in two types of risers. However, there is a second growth on the pressure fluctuations in the S-shaped riser compared with the vertical riser. The period duration in the S-shaped riser is longer, but the liquid slug length is shorter. The occurrence region of severe slugging flow in the S-shaped riser is smaller than that in the vertical riser.

Key words: subsea pipeline, severe slugging, vertical riser, S-shaped flexible riser, flow pattern map

中图分类号:

TE83

叶晶, 郭烈锦, 陈森林, 李清平, 李乃良. 不同立管结构下严重段塞流特性的对比实验研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2015, 2(1): 18-22.

Jing YE, Lie-jin GUO, Sen-lin CHEN, Qing-ping LI, Nai-liang LI. Comparative Experimental Study on Severe Slugging Characteristics in Different Riser Shapes[J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2015, 2(1): 18-22.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 11

[1]	Ye J, Guo L.Multiphase flow pattern recognition in pipeline-riser system by statistical feature clustering of pressure fluctuations[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 102(11): 486. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.08.048 URL
[2]	Wilkens R J.Flow Assurance in Fluid Flow Handbook[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
[3]	Mokhatab S, Towler B F.Severe slugging in flexible riser: review of experimental investigations and OLGA Predictions[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2007, 25(7): 867. doi: 10.1080/10916460601006198 URL
[4]	Nydal O J, Audibert M, Johansen M.Experiments and modeling of gas-liquid flow in an S-shaped riser[C]. Proc. 10th International Multiphase Flow Conference, 2001.
[5]	Yeung H, Tchambak E.Three-phase flows in an S-shaped riser: some preliminary results[C]. Proc. 11th International Multiphase Flow Conference, 2003.
[6]	Malekzadeh R, Henkes R, Mudde R F.Severe slugging in a long pipeline-riser system: experiments and predictions[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2012, 46(1): 9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2012.06.004 URL
[7]	Tin V.Severe slugging in flexible risers[C]. Proc. 5th International Conference on Multiphase Production, 1991.
[8]	Taitel Y, Dukler A.A model for predicting flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas-liquid flow[J]. AIChE Journal, 1976, 22(1): 47. doi: 10.1002/aic.690220105 URL
[9]	Bøe A.Severe slugging characteristics; part I: flow regime for severe slugging[R]. Selected Topics in Two-Phase Flow, Trondheim, Norway, 1981.
[10]	王鑫. 水平管内油气水两相及多相段塞流与集输-上升管路系统严重段塞流研究[D].西安:西安交通大学,2006.
[11]	Montgomery J A.Severe slugging and unstable flows in an S-shaped riser[D]. Bedfordshire: Cranfield University, 2002.

[1]	王娟, 杨明旺, 郑茂尧, 刘凌云, 赵立君. 基于有限元方法进行超高压海底管道弯矩研究 [J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(2): 21-24.
[2]	罗世勇, 王德军, 刘晓霞, 黄俊. 挠性管在深水海底管道中的应用[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(增刊): 53-56.
[3]	王超. 小坡口手工电弧焊工艺在深水海底管道中的应用研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(增刊): 65-68.
[4]	戴源, 奉虎, 袁朝纲, 王艳涛, 樊强. 一种浅滩工况下海底管道高程测量方法[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(增刊): 80-82.
[5]	王威, 陈国民, 陈琦, 鲁瑜, 张宗超. 海底腐蚀缺陷管道可靠性分析及风险评估[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(6): 390-395.
[6]	夏秋玲, 冯现洪. 悬跨评估新趋势及在海管在役评估中的应用[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(3): 154-159.
[7]	邢广阔, 王长涛, 王凤云, 张美荣, 张蓬菲. 采用S-Lay铺设的海底管道终端安装分析[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(2): 129-132.
[8]	夏秋玲. 高温埋设管线的隆起屈曲分析[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(1): 1-5.
[9]	赵党, 何宁, 蔡静, 余志兵, 陈思, 崔少敏. 跨航道大管径海管不停产下沉保护设计和施工效果综述[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(1): 6-11.
[10]	王猛, 赵冬岩. 基于DNV-RP-F101规范的腐蚀海底管道强度评估研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2017, 4(5): 276-280.
[11]	黄钰, 包佳. 深水海底管道铺设发展综述[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2017, 4(5): 281-286.
[12]	王威, 鲁瑜, 张宗超, 郭庆, 县申平, 张庆晓. 海管立管腐蚀缺陷修复关键技术及质量控制[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2017, 4(3): 131-135.
[13]	刘有利, 熊睿, 袁举洋, 洪森. 新型补口工艺在海底管道铺设中的应用[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2017, 4(3): 168-172.
[14]	刘新帅, 李旸, 徐亮, 相政乐. 海底单层保温管道配重层压溃试验分析研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2016, 3(6): 376-380.
[15]	阳连丰, 张晓健. 湿式回收技术在海底管道修复过程中的应用[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2016, 3(4): 217-221.

不同立管结构下严重段塞流特性的对比实验研究

Comparative Experimental Study on Severe Slugging Characteristics in Different Riser Shapes

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 11

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价