当代外语研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (10): 43-48.
张琴, 杨连瑞, 高秀雪
出版日期:
2013-10-15
发布日期:
2020-07-25
作者简介:
张琴,中国海洋大学外国语学院硕士研究生。主要研究方向为第二语言习得与语言教学。电子邮箱:wsbetty@126.com。杨连瑞,中国海洋大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为第二语言习得、英语教学理论。电子邮箱:yanglianrui@yahoo.com.cn。高秀雪,青岛农业大学外国语学院副教授、博士。主要研究方向为语言学。电子邮箱:gxxholly@163.com
ZHANG Qin, YANG Lianrui, GAO Xiuxue
Online:
2013-10-15
Published:
2020-07-25
摘要: 英语中动结构因其独特的句法和语义特征,给二语学习者的习得带来困难。本文以界面假设理论为基础,从语义、语用和句法界面的视角探讨典型英语中动结构以及非典型英语中动结构构成的语义、语用限制条件,以揭示英语中动结构习得的关键,为二语学习者有效习得英语中动结构给予启示。
中图分类号:
张琴, 杨连瑞, 高秀雪. 从语义、语用和句法界面看英语中动结构及其习得[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(10): 43-48.
ZHANG Qin, YANG Lianrui, GAO Xiuxue. The Study of English Middle Construction and its Acquisition from an Interface Perspective of Semantics, Pragmatics and Syntax[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2013, 13(10): 43-48.
Balcom, P. 1999. These constructions don't acquire easily: Middle construction and multicompetence [J]. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 2(1): 5-20. Balcom, P. 2003. Cross-linguistic influence of L2 English on middle constructions in L1 French [A]. In V. Cook (ed.). Effects of the Second Language on the First [C]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Birdsong, D.1992. Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition [J]. Language 68: 706-55. Bos, P., B. Hollebrandse & P. Sleeman. 2004. Introduction: The pragmatics-syntax and the semantics-syntax interface in acquisition [J]. IRAL 42: 101-10. Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use [M]. Praeger:New York. Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program [M]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Fagan, S. 1988. The English middle [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 181-203. Gao, Y. 2008. L2 Acquisition of English MC and Its Related Structures by Chinese and Korean Learners: Towards an Event Structure-based Account [D]. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. Grice, H. 1975. Logic and conversation [A]. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3) [C]. New York: Academic Press. 41-58. Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kim, Sungwook. 2001. English middles as categorical sentences [J]. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 1(4): 537-60. Larsen-Freeman, D. 1998. On the scope of second language acquisition research [J]. Language Learning 48(4): 551-56. Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternation [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Levin, B. & M. Rappaport. 2005. Argument Realization [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reinhart, T.2006. Interface Strategies: Reference-set Computation [M]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. Rothman, J. & R. Slabakova. 2011. The mind-context divide: On acquisition at the linguistic interfaces [J]. Lingua 121: 568-76. Rothman, J. & P. Guijarro-Fuentes. 2012. Linguistic interfaces and language acquisition in childhood: Introduction to the special issue [J]. First Language 32: 3-16. Sorace, A. & F. Filiaci. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian [J]. Second Language Research 22: 339-68. Slabakova, R. 2008. Meaning in the Second Language-Studies on Language Acquisition Series [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Slabakova, R. 2009. What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language? [A]. In M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul & A. Tremblay (eds.). Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference [C]. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Slabakova, R. 2010. Semantic theory and second language acquisition [J]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30: 231-47. Steinbach, M. 2002. Middle Voice: A Comparative Study in the Syntax-Semantics Interface of German [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Stroik, T. 1992. Middles and movement [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 23:1, 127-37. White, L. 2009. Grammatical theory, interfaces and L2 knowledge [A]. In W. C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds). The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. Bingley: Emerald. 49-65. White, L. 2011a. Who is the Interface Hypothesis about? [J]. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1): 48-53. White, L. 2011b. The Interface Hypothesis: How far does it extend? [J]. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1): 108-10. 曹宏.2005.中动结构的语用特点及教学建议[J].汉语学习(5):61-68. 高秀雪.2013.英语中动结构的句法语义界面研究[J].外语教学与研究(1):13-23. 高育松.2009.中国英语学习者对英语空宾语结构的习得——语篇、语义与句法接口的视角[J].外语教学与研究(6):438-46. 陆俭明.2006.句法语义界面问题[J].外国语(3):30-35. 司惠文、余光武.2005.英语中间结构致使生成研究[J].现代外语(1):1-9. 宋国明.1997.句法理论概要[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社. 韦理、戴炜栋.2010.大学生英语定冠词句法语用接口习得研究[J].中国外语(2):47-53. 徐盛桓.2002.语义数量特征与英语中动结构[J].外语教学与研究(6):436-43. 杨佑文.2011.英语中动结构:典型与非典型[J].解放军外国语学院学报(4):18-31. 尹洪山.2012.从句法和语用界面看英语前置句式的习得[J].中国海洋大学学报(3):99-103. |
[1] | 牟凯龙, 赵兰浩, 毛佳. 单层粒子水平集方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 949-957. |
[2] | 熊杰,袁野平,林颖典. 浸没及非浸没刚性短植被群对异重流运动特性的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(3): 285-294. |
[3] | 张孟喜,马原,邱成春. 加强节点布置方式对双向土工格栅拉拔特性的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(12): 1307-1315. |
[4] | 李金龙,尤云祥,陈科. 一种几何VOF方法在液舱晃荡流动模拟中的应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(8): 943-951. |
[5] | 朱帅;瞿珏;王崴;胡波;. 基于改进FAHP-TOPSIS的数控机床人机界面评价模型[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2019, 35(06): 144-148+156. |
[6] | 何思俊;支锦亦;杜洋;闫磊;. 装备驾驶界面人机设计评价研究综述[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2019, 35(05): 97-103. |
[7] | 戴运财. 中国的二语习得理论建设:引进与创新[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(04): 26-36. |
[8] | 王可竹, 朱代兴. 铁钻工钻杆作业界面自动判定系统[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2018, 5(6): 405-409. |
[9] | 王军1,刘莹1,2. 316L不锈钢钝化膜的耐腐蚀性和血液相容性[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2018, 52(5): 593-598. |
[10] | 陈卉. 存在极项词习得情况的实证研究——基于界面假说[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(02): 37-42. |
[11] | 顾新建,于忠奇,宋洋. 工艺参数对高强度钢冷冲压界面温度影响分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(自然版), 2017, 51(4): 426-. |
[12] | 潘亚露;史熙;. 钢丝绳曳引传动力学特性的有限元分析[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2017, 33(04): 152-154. |
[13] | 王晓璐, 杨连瑞, 闫海娟. 动态系统论视角下的二语学习定向动机流研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(04): 49-54. |
[14] | 顾智超, 吴凡,. 基于AMEsim的一种液力偶合器液压系统仿真软件[J]. 传动技术, 2017, 31(04): 44-48. |
[15] | 方少华, 常辉. 儿童母语习得与成人二语习得是否存在本质差异?——以双宾句习得为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(03): 90-95. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||