A Study on the Usage Features of Engagement Markers in Chinese Learners' English Academic Writing

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2019.04.005

Abstract

CLC Number:

H319

LOU Baocui, WANG Yali. A Study on the Usage Features of Engagement Markers in Chinese Learners' English Academic Writing[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(04): 58-69.

Biber, D. & E. Finegan. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect [J]. Text 9 (1): 93-124.
Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crismore, A., R. Markkanen & M. Steffensen. 1993. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students [J]. Written Communication 10 (1): 39-37.
D’Angelo, L. 2008. Gender identity and authority in academic book reviews: An analysis of metadiscourse across disciplines [J]. Linguistica E Filologia 27: 205-221.
Hinkel, E. 1995. The use of modal verbs as are flection of cultural values [J]. TESOL Quarterly 29 (2): 325-343.
Hyland, K. 1998. Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 30 (4): 437-455
Hyland, K. 2001. Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles [J]. Written Communication 18 (4): 549-574.
Hyland, K. 2002. Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing [J]. Applied Linguistics 23 (2): 215-239.
Hyland, K. & P. Tse. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal [J]. Applied Linguistics 25 (2): 156-177.
Hyland, K. 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse [J]. Discourse Analysis 7 (2): 173-192.
Hyland, K. 2010. Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purpose 9 (2): 116-127.
Hyland, K. & F. Jiang. 2016. “ We must conclude that…” : A diachronic study of academic engagement [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 24: 29-42.
Ivanic, R. 1998. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing [M]. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Karahan, P. 2013. Self-mention in scientific articles written by Turkish and non-Turkish authors [J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 70: 305-322.
Kennedy, G. 2002. Variation in the distribution of modal verbs in the British National Corpus [A]. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice & D. Biber (eds.). Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publication Company. 73-90.
Marandi, S. 2003. Metadiscourse in Persian/English master’s theses: A contrastive study [J]. IJAL 6 (2): 23-42.
Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis: English Academic and Research Setting [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., U. Ahmad, Y. Y. Chang, D. Chavez, D. Dressen-Hammouda & R. Seymour. 1998. Consider this: The role of imperatives in scholarly writing [J]. Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 97-121.
Swales, J. M. & C. B. Feak. 2012. Academic Writing for Graduate Students (3rd edn.)[M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Tang, R. & S. John. 1999. The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun [J]. English for Specific Purposes 18: S23-S39.
Toumi, N. 2009. A model for the investigation of reflexive metadiscourse in research articles [J]. Language Studies Working Papers 1: 64-73.
Zarei, G. R. & S. Mansoori. 2007. Metadiscourse in academic prose: A contrastive analysis of English and Persian research articles [J]. The Asian ESP Journal 3 (2): 24-40.
Zareva, A. 2013. Self-mention and the projection of multiple identity roles in TESOL graduate student presentations: The influence of the written academic genres [J]. English for Specific Purposes 32 (2): 72-83.
程晓堂、袭晶. 2007. 中国学生英语作文中情态动词的使用情况——一项基于语料库的[J]. 外语电化教学(6):9-15.
李天贤、庞继贤.2009. 学术写作中元话语的互动功能[J]. 外语教学与研究30 (5):266-271.
梁茂成.2010. 卡方检验和对数似然率计算工具[CP]. 北京:中国外语教育研究中心.
徐昉.2013. 二语学术写作介入标记语的使用与发展特征: 语料库视角[J]. 外语与外语教学(2):5-10.
文秋芳、丁言仁、王文宇.2003. 中国大学生英语书面语中的口语化倾向[J]. 外语教学与研究35 (4):268-274.
周雅.2012. 关于二语学术写作中介入标记语的比较性研究[D]. 南京:南京大学.

[1]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 35-41.
[2]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 72-81.
[3]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 82-91.
[4]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 92-96.
[5]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 97-102.
[6]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 35-44.
[7]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 45-52.
[8]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 61-70.
[9]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 96-103.
[10]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 106-110.
[11]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 84-95.
[12]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 96-105.
[13]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 61-63.
[14]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 64-74.
[15]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 75-85.

A Study on the Usage Features of Engagement Markers in Chinese Learners' English Academic Writing

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments