Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (06): 43-53.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2019.06.004
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Mei, YAN Xiaomeng
Online:2019-11-28
Published:2019-12-25
CLC Number:
YANG Mei, YAN Xiaomeng. An Overview of Chinese Relative Clause Processing Research[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(06): 43-53.
| Chen, B., A. Ning, H. Bi & S. Dunlap. 2008. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses [J]. Acta Psychologica 129(1): 61-65. Gibson, E. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies [J]. Cognition 68(1): 1-76. Gibson, E. 2000. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity [A]. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita & W. O’Neil (eds.). Image, Language, Brain [C]. Cambridge: MIT Press. 95-126. Gibson, E. & H. -H. I. Wu.2013. Processing Chinese relative clauses in context [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(1-2): 125-155. Hawkins, J. A.1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres. Hawkins, J. A. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hawkins, J. A. 2014. Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. He, W. & B. Chen. 2013. The role of animacy in Chinese relative clause processing [J]. Acta Psychologica 144(1): 145-153. He, W., N. Xu & R. Ji. 2017. Effects of age and location in Chinese relative clauses processing [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46(5): 1067-1086. Hsiao, F. 2003. The Syntax and Processing of Relative Clauses in Mandarin Chinese [D]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Hsiao, F. & E. Gibson. 2003. Processing relative clauses in Chinese [J]. Cognition 90(1): 3-27. Hsu, C.-C. N. 2006. Issues in Head-final Relative Clauses in Chinese——Derivation, Processing and Acquisition [D]. University of Delaware. Hsu, C.-C. N., C. Phillips & M. Yoshida. 2005. Cues for head-final relative clauses in Chinese [A]. In 18th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing [C]. Tucson: AZ. Jäger, L., Z. Chen, Q. Li, C.-J.C. Lin & S. Vasishth. 2015. The subject-relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (79-80): 97-120. Keenan, E. L. & B. Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1): 63-99. Kuo, K. & S. Vasishth. 2006. Processing relative clauses: Evidence from Chinese [J]. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Potsdam. Li, Q., X. Guo, Y. Yao & N. Müller. 2016. Relative clause preference in learners of Chinese as a second language [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 39(2): 199-214. Lin, C.-J. C. & T. G. Bever. 2006. Subject preference in the processing of relative clauses in Chinese [A]. In D. Baumer, D. Montero & M. Scanlon (eds.). Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics [C]. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 254-260. Lin, Y. & S. M. Garnsey. 2010. Animacy and the resolution of temporary ambiguity in relative clause comprehension in Mandarin [A]. In H. Yamashita, Y. Hirose & J. Packard (eds.). Processing and Producing Head-final Structures(Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics) [C]. London / New York : Springer. 241-276. MacDonald, M. C. & M. H. Christiansen. 2002. Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) [J]. Psychological Review 109(1): 35-54. MacWhinney, B. & C. Pléh. 1988. The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian [J]. Cognition 29(2): 95-141. O’Grady, W. 1997. Syntactic Development [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. O’Grady, W. 2015. Processing determinism [J]. Language Learning 65(1): 6-32. Packard, J. L., Z. Ye & X. Zhou. 2010. Filler-gap processing in Mandarin relative clauses: Evidence from event-related potentials [A]. In H. Yamashita, Y. Hirose & J. Packard (eds.). Processing and Producing Head-Final Structures (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics) [C]. The Netherlands: Springer. 219-240. Qiao, X., L. Shen & K. Forster. 2012. Relative clause processing in Mandarin: Evidence from the maze task [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(4): 611-630. Sun, X., R. Hancock, T. G. Bever, X. Cheng, L. Schmidt & U. Seifert. 2016. Processing relative clauses in Chinese: Evidence from event-related potentials [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 39(1): 92-114. Vasishth, S., Z. Chen, Q. Li & G. Guo. 2013. Processing Chinese relative clauses: Evidence for the universal subject preference [J]. PLoS One 8(10): 1-14. Wu, F. 2009. Factors affecting relative clause processing in Mandarin [D]. University of Southern California. Wu, F., T. Haskell & E. Andersen. 2006. The interaction of lexical, syntactic, and discourse factors in on-line Chinese parsing: Evidence from eye-tracking [A]. In the 19th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing [C]. New York: CUNY Graduate Center. Wu, F., E. Kaiser & E. Andersen. 2010. Subject preference, head animacy, and lexical cues: A corpus study of relative clauses in Chinese [A]. In H. Yamashita, Y. Hirose & J. Packard (eds.). Processing and Producing Head-final Structures [C]. The Netherlands: Springer. 173-194. Wu, F., E. Kaiser & E. Andersen. 2012. Animacy effects in Chinese relative clause processing [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(10): 1489-1524. Wu, F., Y. Luo & X. Zhou. 2014. Building Chinese relative clause structures with lexical and syntactic cues: Evidence from visual world eye-tracking and reading times [J]. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience 29(10): 1205-1226. Xu, Y. 2014. Processing relative clauses in Chinese as a second language [J]. Second Language Research 30(4): 439-461. 陈宝国、宁爱华. 2008. 汉语主语和宾语关系从句加工难度的比较[J]. 应用心理学 (1): 29-34. 何文广、陈宝国. 2016. 汉语主、宾关系从句加工难度及其核心名词生命性效应[J]. 心理科学 (1): 43-49. 蒋楠、范莉、乔晓妹、张辉、杨枫、吴诗玉. 2016. 第二语言加工:学科内容、研究方法及与二语习得的关系[J]. 当代外语研究 (6): 1-8. 李金满. 2013. 二语视角下汉语关系从句中的量词分布考察[J]. 现代外语 (2): 166-173. 李金满、吴芙芸. 2013. 类型学概括与二语学习者汉语关系从句产出研究[J]. 外语教学与研究 (1): 80-92. 李霄翔、季月. 2014. 句子加工的ERP研究: 理论与研究进展[J]. 中国外语 (5): 25-32. 刘涛、周统权、杨亦鸣. 2011. 主语关系从句加工优势的普遍性——来自汉语关系从句ERP研究的证据[J]. 语言科学 (1): 1-20. 刘月华. 2001. 实用现代汉语语法[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆. 吕叔湘. 1980. 现代汉语八百词[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆. 盛亚南、吴芙芸. 2013. 指量结构与汉语关系从句共现时的不对称分布及其原因——一项基于真实口语语料库的研究[J]. 现代外语 (2): 150-157. 唐正大. 2007. 关系化对象与关系从句的位置——基于真实语料和类型分析[J]. 当代语言学(2): 139-150. 王慧莉、邴文铎. 2013. 汉语关系从句使用频率与加工难度的非一致性——来自ERP的证据[J]. 外语研究(3): 13-22. 吴芙芸. 2011a. 基于经验还是基于工作记忆?——来自汉语新闻语料库中关系从句生命度格局的证据[J]. 语言科学 (4): 396-408. 吴芙芸. 2011b. 试论量名不匹配构式在语料库中的低频出现率及内在原因[J]. 现代外语 (2): 135-142. 吴芙芸. 2013. 增加的中心词会增大加工难度吗?——来自汉语的证据[J]. 外国语 (3): 60-67. 吴芙芸、吕骏. 2016. 汉语关系从句与指量词的位序:二语产出视角[J]. 汉语学习 (4): 84-94. 吴芙芸、盛亚南. 2016. 试论语境条件下限定词的必要性——再谈主语关系从句的加工优势[J]. 外国语 (2): 11-20. 张强、江火. 2010. 关系从句加工优势及局部句法复杂性解释——以汉语主宾语位置的关系从句加工为例[J]. 外语研究(6): 19-26. 张强、杨亦鸣. 2010. 汉语宾语关系从句加工优势——来自神经电生理学研究的证据[J]. 语言科学 (4): 337-353. 周统权、郑伟、舒华、杨亦鸣. 2010. 汉语宾语关系从句加工优势论——来自失语症研究的证据[J]. 语言科学 (3): 225-243. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
