Image schema is an important connotation symbol of verbal metaphor mechanism, and it plays a characteristic role in developing process of verbal metaphor meaning. Based on thinking and comprehending of image schema of verb metaphor, we will concretely analyse cognitive semantic essence of the image schema, observe and study its subcategory manifestation and cognitive operating in verbal metaphor polysemy. We attempt to fully show active cognitive functions of image schema in mental representing and semantic constructing of word meaning, trying to give a new revelation to approaching Russian verbal metaphor and polysemy from the new angle of image schema.
PENG Yuhai, LV Ye
. Image Schema and Development of Verbal Metaphor: On the Verbal Polysemy[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014
, 14(10)
: 11
-16
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.10.003
Арутюнова, Н. Д. 1998. Язык и мир человека [M]. Москва: Языки русской культуры.
Баранов, А. Н. 2003. О типах сочетаемости метафорических моделей [J]. Вопросы языкознания (2): 73-94.
Урысон, Е. В. 2003. Мысль//Новый объяснительный словарь синонимов русского языка. Второе издание [M]. Москва: Языки славянской культуры.
Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way we Think—Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities [M]. New York: Basic Books.
Fillmore, Ch. 1982. Frames semantics [A]. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.). Linguistics in the morning Calm [C]. Seoul: Hanshin. 111-38.
Gibbs, Jr. R., et al. 1994. Taking a stand on the meaning of stand: Bodily experience as motivation for polysemy [J]. Journal of Semantics (4): 231-51.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. The Metaphor we Live by [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mandler, J. M. 2004. The Foundations of Mind: Origins of Conceptual Thought [M]. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ungerer, F. & H. J. Schmidt. 2001. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
陈勇.2011.关于概念分析的本体思考[J].外语研究(1):59-68.
华劭.2010.概念还是观念?概念化还是观念化?概念分析还是观念分析?[J].中国俄语教学(2):1-7.
匡芳涛.2012.隐喻的认知研究与英语词汇教学[J].当代外语研究(2):13-17.
彭玉海.2010.试论动词隐喻映射[J].外语学刊(6):37-40.
王寅.2006.解读语言形成的认知过程——七论语言的体验性:详解基于体验的认知过程[J].四川外语学院学报(6):53-59.
王寅.2007.认知语言学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.
余红卫.2007.隐喻构成与阐释的双域多元性[J].中国外语(4):13-16.
袁凤识、许保芳、王立非.2012.再论隐喻能力的定义[J].外语教学(5):1-7.
曾欣悦.2008.认知语义学的六个基本特征[J].外语研究(5):20-23.
张春楠.2013.对隐喻基本运作方式的再解读——基于“外延内涵传承说”[J].当代外语研究(6):12-16.
张凤、高航.2001.语义研究中的认知观[J].中国俄语教学(1):33-41.
赵学德、孟萍.2011.认知视角下“足/脚”和“foot”的语义转移构架[J].外国语言文学(3):165-70.
朱建新、左广明.2012.再论认知隐喻和转喻的区别与关联[J].外语与外语教学(5):59-62.
朱彦.2010.基于意象图式的动词“穿”的多义体系及意义连接机制[J].语言科学(3):287-99.
