Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies >

2015 , Vol. 15 >Issue 04: 29 - 36

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.04.004

Articles

Evidentiality and Interpersonal Meaning on Interdisciplinary Doctoral Dissertation Abstracts

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

Fold

Abstract

Based on evidentiality, this paper aims to conduct statistics and analysis towards 400 abstracts involving four disciplines named linguistics, computer science, medicine and economics by means of SPSS and EXCEL from the perspective of sensory evidential, reporting evidential, belief evidential and inferring evidential. The result shows that four disciplines make use of sensory evidential, reporting evidential, belief evidential and inferring evidential, with the low frequency of belief evidential. In terms of interpersonal meaning, evidentiality can be used for evaluating reliability of information, can be regarded as metadiscourse so as to guide readers to understand the texts, express attitudes towards propositions or readers.

Cite this article

YU Bifang . Evidentiality and Interpersonal Meaning on Interdisciplinary Doctoral Dissertation Abstracts[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015 , 15(04) : 29 -36 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.04.004

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentality [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 22-25.
Barnes, J. 1984. Evidentials in the Tuyuca verb [J]. Inter-national Journal of American Linguistics 50: 255-57.
Biber, D. et al.1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English [M]. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.
Boas, Franz (ed.). 1911. Handbook of American Indian Languages [C]. Washington: Government Printing House.
Boas, Franz. 1947. Kwakiutl grammar, with a glossary of the suffixes [J]. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (37): 201-377.
Bussmann, H. 1996. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics [M]. London: Routledge.
Chafe, W. & J. Nochols. 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [C]. Norwood: Ablex.
Dendale, P. & L. Tasmowski. 2001. Introduction: Eviden-tiality and related notions [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 339-48.
Frawley, W. 1992. Linguistic Semantics [M]. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Halliday, M. A. K. 2000. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
Hyland, K. 1999. Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles [A]. In Christopher N. Candline & K. Hyland (eds.). Writing: Texts, Processes and practices [C]. London & New York: Longman. 349-50.
Hyland, K. 2005. Metadiscourse [M]. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. & P. Tse. 2004. Metadiscourse in acadenic writing: A reappraisal [J]. Applied Linguistics 25(2): 156-77.
Mushin, I. 2001. Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance: Narrative Retelling [M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Nesler, M. S. et al. 1993. The effect of credibility on perceived power [J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 17: 1407-25.
Palmer, F. 1986. Mood and Modality [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saeed, J. 1997. Semantics [M]. Oxford: Blackwell.
Seliger H. & E. Shohamy. 1989. Second Language Research Methods [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vande Kopple, W. J. 2002. Meta-discourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric [A]. In E. Barton & G. Stygall (eds.). Discourse Studies in Composition [C]. Cresskill: Hampton Press. 91-113.
Willet T. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticali-zation of evidentiality [J]. Studies in Language 12: 51-97.
房红梅.2006.言据性研究述评[J].现代外语(2):191-96.
房红梅、马玉蕾.2008.言据性·主观性·主观化[J].外语学刊(4):96-99.
胡壮麟.1994a.语言的可证性[J].外语教学与研究(1):9-15.
胡壮麟.1994b.可证性、新闻报道和论辩语体[J].外语研究(2):22-28.
胡壮麟.1995.汉语的可证性与语篇分析[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学报)(2):13-23.
胡壮麟、朱永生、张德禄、李战子.2012.系统功能语言学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
李健雪.2007.论实据性策略对英语学术书评动态建构的制约作用[J].山东外语教学(5):30-35.
罗桂花.廖美珍.2013.法庭话语中的言据性[J].语言研究(4):92-95.
牛保义.2005.国外实据性理论研究[J].当代语言学(1):53-61.
高晴.2011.英语气候变化新闻中的言据性的人际功能探析[J].外语研究(2):323
孙自挥、陈渝.2010.大学生英语论文写作中的言据性研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)(5):44-48.
汤斌.2007.英语疫情新闻中言据性的语篇功能的系统功能研究[D].复旦大学.
王国凤、喻旭燕.2011.汉英新闻语篇言据性类型学研究[J].西安外国语大学学报(2):30-33.
王丽.2005.中文娱乐新闻中实据性词的语用分析[D].广东外语外贸大学.
王天华.2010.论言据性的语义范围[J].外语学刊(1):81-84.
谢文婷.2010.英语广告语篇中的实据性研究[D].安徽大学.
杨信彰.2007.元话语与语言功能[J].外语与外语教学(12):1-3.
严辰松.2000.语言如何表达“言之有据”——传信范畴浅说[J].解放军外国语学院学报(1):4-7.
杨林秀.2009.英语科研论文中的言据性[D].厦门大学.
张敏灵.2009.语用视角下广告语篇的实据性分析[D].西南大学.
张延君.2006.学术论文的人际意义研究[M].青岛:中国海洋大学出版社.
朱永生、严世清.2001.系统功能语言学多维思考[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉