Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies >
“Proximization” as a Positive Discourse Strategy:A Case Study of Zhu Ziqing’s Essay “Spring”
“Proximization”, as a new perspective of discourse analysis, is widely used in Critical Discourse Analysis. Its assumption is that discourse producer usually depicts the Outside Deictic Center (ODC) as a dangerous entity gradually moving closer to the Inside Deictic Center (IDC), and persuades IDC to take actions against impending ODC to legalize their illegal actions. Thus, proximization is assigned a negative coloring. However, in this research it is found that “proximization” can be used as a positive discourse strategy for Positive Discourse Analysis. ODC is not always negative or dangerous,but sometimes it is friendly and beneficial to IDC. This research takes the prose “Spring” (by Zhu Ziqing) as an example, from the perspective of spatial proximization, temporal proximization and axiological proximization, to have made positive discourse analysis of the prose “Spring”. It has been found that the relationship between ODC and IDC in the prose “Spring” is not hostile but harmonious. ODC transfers positive power to IDC, IDC warmly embracing ODC. It is evident that proximization in the prose “Spring” is a positive discourse strategy.
LUO Xuanmin, CAO Yunzhi . “Proximization” as a Positive Discourse Strategy:A Case Study of Zhu Ziqing’s Essay “Spring”[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2023 , 23(3) : 103 -113 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2023.03.012
| [1] | Cap, P. 2006. Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric[M]. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press. |
| [2] | Cap, P. 2008. Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse[J]. Journal of Pragmatics (1): 17-41. |
| [3] | Cap, P. 2010. Axiological aspects of proximization[J]. Journal of Pragmatics (2): 392-407. |
| [4] | Cap, P. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing[M]. John Benjamins Publishing. |
| [5] | Cap, P. 2015a. Crossing symbolic distances in political discourse space: Evaluative rhetoric within the framework of proximization[J]. Critical Discourse Studies (3): 313-329. |
| [6] | Cap, P. 2015b. Follow-ups in the US anti-terrorist discourse: Proposal for a macro-discursive approach to monologic follow-up sequences[J]. Discourse & Society (5): 543-561. |
| [7] | Cap, P. 2017. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse[M]. Palgrave Macmillan, London. |
| [8] | Cap, P. 2018a. From ‘cultural unbelonging’to ‘errorist risk’: Communicating threat in the Polish anti-immigration discourse[J]. Critical Discourse Studies (3): 285-302. |
| [9] | Cap, P. 2018b. ‘We don’t want any immigrants or terrorists here’: The linguistic manufacturing of xenophobia in the post-2015 Poland[J]. Discourse & Society (4): 380-398. |
| [10] | Chilton, P. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice[M]. London: Routledge. |
| [11] | Dunmire, P. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. |
| [12] | Kopytowska, M. 2015. IDEOLOGY OF ‘HERE AND NOW’Mediating distance in television news[J]. Critical Discourse Studies (3): 347-365. |
| [13] | Kopytowska, M. 2020. Proximization, prosumption and salience in digital discourse: On the interface of social media communicative dynamics and the spread of populist ideologies[J]. Critical Discourse Studies (2): 144-160. |
| [14] | Mando, J. & G. Stack. 2018. Convincing the public to kill: Asian Carp and the proximization of invasive species threat[J]. Environmental Communication (6): 820-833. |
| [15] | 陈前瑞、 Vittorio Tantucci. 2021. 持续体与未完整体的类型学思考[J]. 外语教学与研究(3): 323-335. |
| [16] | 哈长辰、 黄国文. 2022. 生态语言学新思想及其对生态话语分析的启示[J]. 当代外语研究(5): 88-96. |
| [17] | 胡壮麟. 2012. 积极话语分析和批评话语分析的互补性[J]. 当代外语研究(7): 3-8. |
| [18] | 刘文宇、 徐博书. 2018. 从“伙伴”到“对手”:《美国国家安全战略报告》的话语空间分析[J]. 外语研究 (6): 8-15. |
| [19] | 陆俭明. 1999 “着(·zhe)”字补议[J]. 中国语文(5): 331-336. |
| [20] | 唐青叶. 2012. 弱势群体身份表征的积极话语分析[J]. 当代外语研究(9): 10-14. |
| [21] | 王品. 2018. 重生、救赎与共情:语言暴力事件的积极话语分析视角[J]. 当代外语研究(4):49-57. |
| [22] | 武建国、 林金容、 栗艺. 2016. 批评性话语分析的新方法——趋近化理论[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报) (5):75-82. |
| [23] | 武建国、 牛振俊. 2018. 趋近化理论视域下的政治话语合法化分析——以特朗普的移民政策为例[J]. 中国外语(6):48-53. |
| [24] | 颜冰、 张辉. 2018. 基于中美贸易战话语的批评认知语言学研究——趋近化理论的视角[J]. 外语研究(6):16-22. |
| [25] | 张慧、 林正军、 董晓明. 2021. 中美气候变化新闻报道中生态话语的趋近化研究[J]. 西安外国语大学学报(1):35-40. |
| [26] | 张辉、 颜冰. 2019. 政治冲突话语的批评认知语言学研究——基于叙利亚战争话语的个案研究[J]. 外语与外语教学 (4):14-27. |
| [27] | 张辉、 杨艳琴. 2019. 批评认知语言学:理论基础与研究现状[J]. 外语教学 (3):1-11. |
| [28] | 张天伟. 2016. 政治领导人演讲的话语体系构建研究——基于近体化理论的案例分析[J]. 中国外语(5):28-35. |
| [29] | 张艳敏、 张辉. 2020. 突发公共卫生事件话语的批评认知语言学分析——2018“疫苗事件”中外媒体报道的个案研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报(6):73-81. |
| [30] | 赵秀凤、 赵琳. 2021. 趋近化理论对于非传统安全话语的阐释:一个案例研究[J]. 天津外国语大学学报(3):63-77. |
| [31] | 周冰. 2021. 趋近化理论视域下的媒体立场研究——基于德国媒体“华为威胁论”相关报道的语料库分析[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报) (3):71-81. |
| [32] | 朱永生. 2006. 积极话语分析:对批评话语分析的反拨与补充[J]. 英语研究 (4):36-42. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
