Body Criticism in the Digital Age

  • XIE Chuanbo ,
  • DING Jianxin
Expand

Online published: 2025-11-07

Abstract

Body criticism in the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) theory is a discourse criticism paradigm rooted in culture and society. It is language criticism, cultural criticism and social criticism. This critical paradigm is not only influenced by ideology, but also closely related to society and power. With the continuous innovation of human scientific paradigms, various anxieties arise in the integration of the body with machinery and technology. Originating from the theory of cybernetics, the cyborg not only liberates the body, but also becomes a tool of political desire to manipulate the body, with a strong ideological inclination. In the meta-verse, the exploration of body signs is of socio-archaeological significance. The real self and the virtual body communicate and spread meaning in fictional imagery and discourse spaces. In the Artificial Intelligence (AI) language models, the body and the mind are homogeneous rather than dichotomous. In the digital age, the body is a battleground of cultural power, and as a linguistic sign, the body suffers from the reshaping of hegemonic discourse and unequal treatment. The technology should have been liberated power of human beings, but it is now constantly being reduced to a shackle that binds the body. The value issues of technology, humanity, ethics and so on need to be pondered deeply.

Key words: body; criticism; sign; meaning

Cite this article

XIE Chuanbo , DING Jianxin . Body Criticism in the Digital Age[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2025 , 25(5) : 178 -185 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2025.05.018

References

[1] Gal, S. & T. J. Irvine. 2019. Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[2] Haraway, D. A. 1991. Cyborg Manifesto: Science, technology and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century[A]. In D. J. Haraway (ed.). Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature[C]. New York: Routledge. 149-181.
[3] Longhurst, B. et al. 2008. Introducing Cultural Studies:Second Edition[M]. London: Longman.
[4] Silverstein, M. 1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology[A]. In C. R. Paul, et al. (eds.). The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels[C]. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 193-247.
[5] 丹尼·卡瓦拉罗. 2013. 文化理论关键词(张卫东等译)[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社.
[6] 丁建新, 等. 2001. 批评话语分析述评[J]. 当代语言学(4):305-310.
[7] 丁建新. 2005. 语言、现实与梦幻世界——童话叙事中的非互动模式及其意义[J]. 现代外语(4):41-47,111.
[8] 丁建新、 廖益清. 2011. 批评语言学[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社.
[9] 丁建新. 2013. 从话语批评到文化批评——“边缘话语与社会”研究[J]. 江西社会科学(9):71-75.
[10] 丁建新. 2014. 叙事的批评话语分析:社会符号学模式(第2版)[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
[11] 丁建新. 2015. 文化的转向:体裁分析与话语分析[M]. 天津: 南开大学出版社.
[12] 丁建新, 等. 2015. 身体的言说——身体作为社会符号[J]. 天津外国语大学学报(6):8-14.
[13] 丁建新. 2016. 作为文化的语法——功能语言学的人类学解释[J]. 现代外语(4):459-469,582-583.
[14] 丁建新, 等. 2016. 文化研究[M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社.
[15] 克里斯·希林. 2011. 文化、技术与社会中的身体(李康译)[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[16] 刘禾. 2022. 弗氏人偶——与机器人有关的精神世界[J]. 文化纵横(6):112-121,159.
[17] 米歇尔·福柯. 2016. 自我技术:福柯文选Ⅲ(汪民安编)[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[18] 陶东风. 2010. 消费文化语境中的身体美学[J]. 马克思主义与现实(2):27-34.
[19] 汪民安、 陈永国. 2003. 后身体:文化、权力与生命政治学[M]. 吉林: 吉林人民出版社.
[20] 解传博. 2023. “空无”的意义:罗兰·巴特符号学思想[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版)(1):56-64.
Outlines

/