Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies >
The Fractal Construction Models of Personification Metaphors: An Interdisciplinary Perspective
From the perspective of cognitive linguistics, personification is a rhetorical device grounded in the conceptual metaphor that attributes human qualities to non-human entities. To systematically elucidate its construction, this study introduces fractal theory and the concept of “feature-based metaphor”. Its cognitive mechanism involves extracting specific features from the fractal manifestations of the vehicle “human” and mapping them onto the tenor. By integrating frame semantics and individual behavior theory, this study deconstructs the concept of “human” into six fractal dimensions - physiology, behavior, cognition, emotion, personality, and situation - yielding six models of personification metaphors. Cross-cultural personification metaphors of “wind” in Chinese and Russian literary works serve to validate the models’ applicability. This research clarifies the cross-domain integration of personification metaphors, advances the application of fractal theory in cognitive linguistics, and offers new insights for cross-cultural metaphor comprehension in foreign language teaching.
LIU Chunjie , WANG Jinjun . The Fractal Construction Models of Personification Metaphors: An Interdisciplinary Perspective[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2025 , 25(5) : 186 -195 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2025.05.019
| [1] | Coulson, S. & T. Oakley. 2005. Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics[J]. Journal of Pragmatics (37): 1510-1536. |
| [2] | Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2008. The origin of language as a product of the evolution of double-scope blending[J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(5): 520-521. |
| [3] | Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| [4] | Karpukhina, T. P. & A. V. Lugovskoy. 2021. Anthropomorphic metaphorical features in figurative content of island concept[J]. Nauchnyi Dialog (11):106-122. |
| [5] | Karatkevich, Z.A. & M.O. Lojko. 2022. Anthropomorphous metaphor in economic discourse: receptive learning by Russian-speaking students[J]. Cuadernos de Rusistica Espanola (18): 173-186. |
| [6] | Kim, HaeYeon. 2019. A Feature-based analysis of similes and metaphors in metaphor theory[J]. Discourse and Cognition 26(1): 21-42. |
| [7] | van der Merwe, P. H. 2021. Recycling ghosts: Reimagining C. Louis Leipoldt’s play “Die Laaste Aand” (1930)[D]. South Africa: University of Pretoria. |
| [8] | 陈鹏展. 2018. 个体行为的机器识别与决策协同[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社. |
| [9] | 李光华. 2024. 扩展概念隐喻理论视角下《我是你的瓷儿》拟人隐喻识解[J]. 山东理工大学学报(社会科学版) 40(6):76-86. |
| [10] | 束定芳. 2000. 隐喻学研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社. |
| [11] | 王银平. 2021. 基于认知视角的拟人隐喻及其文化内涵研究[J]. 汉字文化(13):182-184,190. |
| [12] | 文秋芳. 2017. 拟人隐喻“人类命运共同体”的概念、人际和语篇功能——评析习近平第70届联合国大会一般性辩论中的演讲[J]. 外语学刊(3):1-6. |
| [13] | 肖思虹. 2025. 文旅宣传用语中的拟人隐喻[J]. 汉字文化(9):95-98. |
| [14] | 徐盛桓. 2020a. 隐喻喻体的建构——分形论视域下隐喻研究之一[J]. 外语教学 41(1):6-11. |
| [15] | 徐盛桓. 2020b. 隐喻本体和喻体的相似——分形论视域下隐喻研究之二[J]. 当代修辞学(2):11-23. |
| [16] | 徐一楠. 2024. 拟人隐喻视角下的生态话语构建——以南京市红山森林动物园公示语为例[J]. 外语研究 41(6):50-54. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |