诊断学理论与实践 ›› 2020, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (05): 499-503.doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2020.05.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

伴浆膜腔积液的恶性黑色素瘤5例临床和细胞病理学检查分析

杨巧1a, 温玉婷2, 杨昌伟1b()   

  1. 1.空军军医大学西京医院a. 病理科,b. 急诊科,陕西 西安 710032
    2.西安市第九医院病理科,陕西 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-01 出版日期:2020-10-25 发布日期:2022-07-14
  • 通讯作者: 杨昌伟 E-mail:1468026834@qq.com

Five cases of the malignant melanoma with serosal effusion: the clinical and pathological analysis

YANG Qiao1a, WEN Yuting2, YANG Changwei1b()   

  1. 1a. Department of Pathology, 1b. Department of Emergency, Xijing Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Shanxi Xi'an 710032, China
    2. Department of Pathology, Shanxi Xi'an The Ninth Hospital, Shanxi Xi'an 710054, China
  • Received:2020-04-01 Online:2020-10-25 Published:2022-07-14
  • Contact: YANG Changwei E-mail:1468026834@qq.com

摘要:

目的: 观察伴浆膜腔积液的恶性黑色素瘤患者的临床表现,分析该病的细胞病理学诊断及鉴别诊断特征。方法: 收集5例经浆膜腔积液细胞学检查诊断为恶性黑色素瘤的病例,观察浆膜腔积液细胞涂片的细胞学形态特征,分析浆膜腔积液离心、包埋后行免疫细胞化学染色的结果,总结患者的临床及预后特点。结果: 5例患者中男性2例,女性3例,发病年龄为30~71岁,平均年龄为48.6岁;其中,3例患者为胸腔积液,2例为腹腔积液。5例患者的浆膜腔积液细胞涂片形态学观察、免疫细胞化学染色结果(HMB45、S-100、Pan-mel、SOX10、波形蛋白均为阳性表达)均证实为恶性黑色素瘤。患者随访至2020年4月,累计随访2~11个月,3例患者死亡,1例存活,1例失访。结论: 恶性黑色素瘤引起浆膜腔积液十分罕见,多数患者有明确的既往病史,诊断并不困难。浆膜腔积液细胞学检查诊断恶性黑色素瘤时,需与低分化腺癌、淋巴瘤、恶性间皮瘤进行鉴别,离心包埋细胞蜡块及免疫细胞化学染色有助于诊断。由于转移性恶性黑色素瘤患者存活期较短,及时行浆膜腔积液细胞学检查十分重要。

关键词: 浆膜腔积液, 黑色素瘤, 细胞学诊断, 临床特征

Abstract:

Objective: To study the clinical manifestations, cytopathological diagnosis and differential diagnosis of the malignant melanoma with serosal effusion. Methods: Five cases of malignant melanoma diagnosed by the cytology of serosal effusion in XijingHospital were enrolled. The cytology of serosal smear and the immunocytochemical staining of the paraffin-embedded section prepared from centrifugation of the serous effusion were studied, and the clinical feature and prognosis of the patients were analyzed. Results: Five cases included 2 males and 3 females, the age of onset ranged from 30 to 71 years and the average age was 48.6 years. Three cases had pleural effusion and 2 cases had intraperitoneal effusion. Five cases were diagnosed as malignant melanoma by morphological observation in the serosal smear and immunocytochemistry examination(all case was positive for HMB45, S-100, Pan-mel, SOX10 and vimentin). All patients were followed up until April 2020, with a follow-up period of 2 to 11 months. In 5 cases, three died, one survived and one was lost during follow-up. Conclusions: The serous cavity effusion caused by malignant melanoma is very rare, and the diagnosis is not difficult since most cases have clear history. The malignant melanoma diagnosed by the cytology of serosal effusion need to be differentiated with the poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, and malignant mesothelioma. Centrifugation of the serosal effusion and immunocytochemical staining is helpful to make diagnosis. It is important to confirm the diagnosis by performing cytological examination of serous effusion accurately and timely because of the low survival rate of metastatic malignant melanoma.

Key words: Serous cavity effusion, Melanoma, Cytological diagnosis, Clinical feature

中图分类号: